Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validità dei sistemi di classificazione ecografica nell’identificare i noduli tiroidei da non sottoporre all’agoaspirato

  • RASSEGNA
  • Published:
L'Endocrinologo Aims and scope

Sommario

La prevalenza dei noduli tiroidei nella popolazione generale è in continuo incremento, e per almeno la metà dei noduli sottoposti a FNA il risultato della citologia è benigno. I sistemi di classificazione ecografica del rischio sono stati proposti anche come test di esclusione, utilizzati al fine di identificare i noduli che non necessitano di agoaspirato tiroideo. Scopo di questa rassegna è valutare le più recenti evidenze scientifiche sulla capacità delle classificazioni ecografiche del rischio nell’identificare i noduli da non sottoporre a FNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Bibliografia

  1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC et al. (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 26(1):1–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Floridi C, Cellina M, Buccimazza G et al. (2019) Ultrasound imaging classifications of thyroid nodules for malignancy risk stratification and clinical management: state of the art. Gland Surg 8(Suppl 3):S233–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R et al. (2009) An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(5):1748–1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Campanella P, Ianni F, Rota CA et al. (2014) Quantification of cancer risk of each clinical and ultrasonographic suspicious feature of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 170(5):R203–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi SH, Kim EK, Kwak JY et al. (2010) Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 20(2):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu T, Wu Y, Wu RX et al. (2019) Validation and comparison of three newly-released Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems for cancer risk determination. Endocrine 64(2):299–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grani G, Lamartina L, Ascoli V et al. (2019) Reducing the number of unnecessary thyroid biopsies while improving diagnostic accuracy: toward the “right” TIRADS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104(1):95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ha EJ, Na DG, Baek JH et al. (2018) US fine-needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancy: diagnostic performance of seven society guidelines applied to 2000 thyroid nodules. Radiology 287(3):893–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR et al. (2016) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules—2016 update. Endocr Pract 22(5):622–639

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF et al. (2017) European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 6(5):225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG et al. (2017) ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin JH, Baek JH, Chung J et al. (2016) Ultrasonography diagnosis and imaging-based management of thyroid nodules: revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations. Korean J Radiol 17(3):370–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S et al. (2014) Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 81(Suppl 1):1–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horvath E, Silva CF, Majlis S et al. (2017) Prospective validation of the ultrasound based TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System) classification: results in surgically resected thyroid nodules. Eur Radiol 27(6):2619–2628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon JH, Lee HS, Kim EK et al. (2016) Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: comparison between the thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines. Radiology 278(3):917–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chng CL, Tan HC, Too CW et al. (2018) Diagnostic performance of ATA, BTA and TIRADS sonographic patterns in the prediction of malignancy in histologically proven thyroid nodules. Singap Med J 59(11):578–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Persichetti A, Di Stasio E, Guglielmi R et al. (2018) Predictive value of malignancy of thyroid nodule ultrasound classification systems: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103(4):1359–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ha EJ, Moon WJ, Na DG et al. (2016) A multicenter prospective validation study for the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with thyroid nodules. Korean J Radiol 17(5):811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Catania, ARNAS Garibaldi Nesima, Catania, Italia

    Adriano Naselli, Dario Tumino & Francesco Frasca

Authors
  1. Adriano Naselli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Tumino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Frasca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Frasca.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Adriano Naselli, Dario Tumino e Francesco Frasca dichiarano di non avere conflitti di interesse.

Consenso informato

Lo studio presentato in questo articolo non ha richiesto sperimentazione umana.

Studi sugli animali

Gli autori di questo articolo non hanno eseguito studi sugli animali.

Additional information

Proposto da Pasqualino Malandrino.

Materiale elettronico supplementare

I link al materiale elettronico supplementare sono elencati qui sotto.

(DOC 36 kB)

(DOC 47 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naselli, A., Tumino, D. & Frasca, F. Validità dei sistemi di classificazione ecografica nell’identificare i noduli tiroidei da non sottoporre all’agoaspirato. L'Endocrinologo 21, 108–114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40619-020-00681-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40619-020-00681-8

Parole chiave

Search

Navigation