Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting the AJCC staging system of adrenocortical carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the performance characteristics of AJCC 7th and 8th staging systems among patients with adrenal cortical carcinoma.

Methods

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18-registry was accessed and patients with adrenocortical carcinoma who were diagnosed 2010–2015 with complete information about AJCC 7th staging system were included. AJCC 8th staging system information was then reconstructed for each patient using available TNM staging variables. Kaplan–Meier overall survival estimates, multivariable Cox regression analysis, and concordance index (C-statistic) were used to examine the performance characteristics of both staging systems.

Results

A total of 574 patients with a diagnosis of adrenocortical carcinoma were included in the current analysis. Using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, overall survival was compared among different AJCC stages for both versions; and the P value was significant (< 0.001) for both comparisons. C-statistic was then calculated for both staging systems and the results were as follows: for AJCC 7th version: 0.726 (95% CI 0.683–0.769); and for AJCC 8th version: 0.745 (95% CI 0.704–0.786). Patients with M1 disease (stage IV according to AJCC 8th edition) were then divided according to the extent of distant metastases into single versus multiple sites of metastases. Using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates, patients with a single site of metastases have better overall survival (P = 0.006). A C-statistic for a hypothetical modification of AJCC 8th staging system subdividing stage IV patients into IVA and IVB based on the number of metastatic sites was: 0.753 (95% CI 0.713–0.794).

Conclusions

There is a minimal difference in the prognostic performance between both versions of the AJCC staging system. Subdivision of stage IV cancer into stage IVA and IVB (according to the number of organs with metastatic deposits) should be considered in subsequent versions of adrenocortical carcinoma staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM et al (2014) Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Rev 35(2):282–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fassnacht M, Kroiss M, Allolio B (2013) Update in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(12):4551–4564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, Baudin E, Berruti A, de Krijger R et al (2018) European society of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 179(4):G1-g46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Owen DH, Patel S, Wei L, Phay JE, Shirley LA, Kirschner LS et al (2019) Metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: a single institutional experience. Horm Cancer 10(4–6):161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papotti M, Libè R, Duregon E, Volante M, Bertherat J, Tissier F (2011) The Weiss score and beyond–histopathology for adrenocortical carcinoma. Horm Cancer 2(6):333–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Libé R, Borget I, Ronchi CL, Zaggia B, Kroiss M, Kerkhofs T et al (2015) Prognostic factors in stage III-IV adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC): an European network for the study of adrenal tumor (ENSAT) study. Ann Oncol 26(10):2119–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLellis RA (2004) Pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. IARC

  8. Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M, Bucsky P, Willenberg HS, Beuschlein F et al (2009) Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union against cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer 115(2):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amin MB, Edge SB (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer

  10. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (2020) SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER research data, 18 registries, Nov 2019 sub (2000–2017)—linked to county attributes—time dependent (1990–2017) income/rurality, 1969–2018 counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2020, based on the November 2019 submission. Available at: www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed 24 Nov 2020

  11. Fassnacht M, Assie G, Baudin E, Eisenhofer G, de la Fouchardiere C, Haak HR et al (2020) Adrenocortical carcinomas and malignant phaeochromocytomas: ESMO-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 31(11):1476–1490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaidya A, Nehs M, Kilbridge K (2019) Treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Surg Pathol Clin 12(4):997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel-Rahman O (2018) Validation of American joint committee on cancer eighth staging system among prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 10(2):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdel-Rahman O (2018) Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168(1):269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Abdel-Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Advisory board; Eisai Canada, Lilly Canada, and Roche Canada.

Informed consent

As this study is based on a publicly available database without identifying patient information, informed consent was not needed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40618_2021_1618_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file1 (JPG 39 KB) Supplementary figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve for the overall survival according to extent of metastatic disease (among patients with M1 disease)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Rahman, O. Revisiting the AJCC staging system of adrenocortical carcinoma. J Endocrinol Invest 45, 89–94 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01618-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01618-0

Keywords

Navigation