Abstract
Background
Good glycaemic control during pregnancy is key to reduce maternal and foetal complications. Insulin degludec, an ultralong acting analogue with a “peakless” and stable pharmacokinetic profile, has the potential advantage of reducing hypoglycaemia and glucose variability compared to other basal insulins. Therefore, degludec could be a reasonable therapeutic option for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, degludec is not licensed for use during pregnancy owing to the lack of safety data.
Methods and results
We herein report details on pregnancy and foetal outcomes in three women with uncontrolled T1D treated with insulin degludec during the first trimester or the whole pregnancy. In addition, we report an updated review of similar cases reported in literature. Overall, no congenital neonatal malformation was observed in the six cases described. Three babies required neonatal intensive care unit admission for respiratory distress, apnoeas, bilirubin increase or hypoglycaemia. However, the observed neonatal complications were deemed unlikely to be related to degludec treatment.
Conclusions
In summary, while awaiting for the results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial, data on six cases of degludec exposure during pregnancy reassuringly suggest no embryo–foetal toxicity. More information is needed before degludec can be safely recommended during pregnancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kitzmiller JL, Block JM, Brown FM, Catalano PM, Conway DL, Coustan DR, Gunderson EP, Herman WH, Hoffman LD, Inturrisi M, Jovanovic LB, Kjos SI, Knopp RH, Montoro MN, Ogata ES, Paramsothy P, Reader DM, Rosenn BM, Thomas AM, Kirkman MS (2008) Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy: summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care. Diabetes Care 31(5):1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9020
Tumminia A, Milluzzo A, Cinti F, Parisi M, Tata F, Frasca F, Frittitta L, Vigneri R, Sciacca L (2018) Abnormal 1-hour post-load glycemia during pregnancy impairs post-partum metabolic status: a single-center experience. J Endocrinol Invest 41(5):567–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0774-z
Association AD (2018) Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 41(Suppl 1):S137–S143. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-s013
Group TDCaCTR (1997) Hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. The diabetes control and complications trial research Group. Diabetes 46(2):271–286
Hirsch IB (2005) Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 352(2):174–183. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040832
Lambert K, Holt RI (2013) The use of insulin analogues in pregnancy. Diabetes Obes Metab 15(10):888–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12098
Hod M, Damm P, Kaaja R, Visser GH, Dunne F, Demidova I, Hansen AS, Mersebach H (2008) Fetal and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: a randomized study comparing insulin aspart with human insulin in 322 subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(2):186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.005
Mathiesen ER, Kinsley B, Amiel SA, Heller S, McCance D, Duran S, Bellaire S, Raben A (2007) Maternal glycemic control and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized trial of insulin aspart versus human insulin in 322 pregnant women. Diabetes Care 30(4):771–776. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1887
Wyatt JW, Frias JL, Hoyme HE, Jovanovic L, Kaaja R, Brown F, Garg S, Lee-Parritz A, Seely EW, Kerr L, Mattoo V, Tan M (2005) Congenital anomaly rate in offspring of mothers with diabetes treated with insulin lispro during pregnancy. Diabet Med 22(6):803–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01498.x
Hod M, Mathiesen ER, Jovanovic L, McCance DR, Ivanisevic M, Duran-Garcia S, Brondsted L, Nazeri A, Damm P (2014) A randomized trial comparing perinatal outcomes using insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn in type 1 diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 27(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.799650
Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M, Duran Garcia S, Brondsted L, Jovanovic L, Damm P, McCance DR (2012) Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35(10):2012–2017. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2264
Lepercq J, Lin J, Hall GC, Wang E, Dain MP, Riddle MC, Home PD (2012) Meta-analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with the use of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:649070. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/649070
Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, Feldman A, Rasmussen S, Haahr H (2012) Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 14(9):859–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01627.x
Toledano Y, Hadar E, Hod M (2018) Pharmacotherapy for hyperglycemia in pregnancy—the new insulins. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.035
Milluzzo A, Tumminia A, Scalisi NM, Frittitta L, Vigneri R, Sciacca L (2017) Insulin degludec in the first trimester of pregnancy: report of two cases. J Diabetes Investig. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12721
Formoso G, Ginestra F, Di Dalmazi G, Consoli A (2018) Empagliflozin, metformin and insulin degludec, during pregnancy: a case report. Acta Diabetol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-018-1134-y
Russell-Jones D, Gall MA, Niemeyer M, Diamant M, Del Prato S (2015) Insulin degludec results in lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and fasting plasma glucose vs. insulin glargine: a meta-analysis of seven clinical trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 25(10):898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2015.06.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
GPF received grant support, lecture or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Genzyme, Abbott, Novartis and Merck Sharp & Dohme. FD received grants from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk and Boehringer-Ingelheim. AA received research grants, lecture or advisory board fees from Merck Sharp & Dome, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Mediolanum, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Servier and Takeda. BMB declares no conflict of interest.
Ethics statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonora, B.M., Avogaro, A. & Fadini, G.P. Exposure to insulin degludec during pregnancy: report of a small series and review of the literature. J Endocrinol Invest 42, 345–349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0926-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0926-9