Abstract
Introduction
Since varicocele is often associated with other venous abnormalities, this study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of dilation of the periprostatic venous plexus (DPVP) in these patients and the effects of this association on sperm parameters before and after varicocelectomy.
Materials and Methods
Sperm parameters were evaluated using the conventional WHO criteria, and seminal fluid viscosity was further evaluated by quantitative viscometry, in 50 patients (aged 20–38 years) who underwent surgical treatment for grade III bilateral varicocele.
Results
Thirty patients with varicocele had also DPVP (DPVP+) (60 %). Sperm concentration and the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology did not differ significantly in patients with DPVP− or DPVP+ before or after surgical repair. On the other hand, sperm progressive motility was low in all patients and increased significantly after varicocele repair, but only in DPVP− patients. Before varicocele treatment, a significantly higher number of DPVP+ patients (25/30 = 83.3 %) had seminal fluid hyperviscosity compared to DPVP− patient (2/20 = 10.0 %). Viscosity quantitative measurement was significantly higher in DPVP+ patients both before and after varicocele repair compared to DPVP− patients. These latter showed a statistically significant reduction of sperm viscosity after varicocele surgical repair compared to pretreatment values. Finally, periprostatic venous plexus diameter and seminal fluid viscosity correlated directly in DPVP+ patients.
Conclusions
In conclusion, these results showed that a large number of patients with varicocele had a concomitant DPVP. This subset of patients did not take advantage from varicocele surgical repair since only DPVP− varicocele patients showed a significant improvement of sperm progressive motility and seminal fluid viscosity. These findings suggest the evaluation of the periprostatic venous plexus and seminal fluid viscosity before patients with varicocele undergo surgical repair for asthenozoospemia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
La Vignera S, Condorelli R, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE (2012) Effects of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial function, chromatin condensation, and apoptosis. J Androl 33:389–396
Chen SS, Chen LK (2011) Predictive factors of successful varicocelectomy in infertile patients. Urol Int 86:320–324
Sakamoto H, Ogawa Y (2008) Is varicocele associated with underlying venous abnormalities? Varicocele and the prostatic venous plexus. J Urol 180:1427–1431
La Vignera S, Calogero AE, Condorelli RA, Vicari LO, Catanuso M, D’Agata R, Vicari E (2012) Ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with male accessory gland infection. Andrologia 44:26–31
La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Salemi M, Calogero AE (2012) Hyperviscosity of semen in patients with male accessory gland infection: direct measurement with quantitative viscosimeter. Andrologia 44:556–559
World Health Organization (2010) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Elia J, Delfino M, Imbrogno N, Capogreco F, Lucarelli M, Rossi T, Mazzilli F (2009) Human semen hyperviscosity: prevalence, pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects. Asian J Androl 11:609–615
La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, Salmeri M, Morgia G, Favilla V, Cimino S, Calogero AE (2014) Microbiological investigation in male infertility: a practical overview. J Med Microbiol 63:1–14
Litwin MS, McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ Jr, Nickel JC, Calhoun EA, Pontari MA, Alexander RB, Farrar JT, O’Leary MP (1999) The national institutes of health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. Chronic prostatitis collaborative research network. J Urol 162:369–375
Karadeniz-Bilgili MY, Basar H, Simsir I, Unal B, Batislam E (2003) Assessment of sapheno-femoral junction continence in patients with primary adolescent varicocoele. Pediatr Radiol 33:603–606
Ciaccio V, Ficola F, Ceccarelli F, Capodicasa E (1995) Assessment of sapheno-femoral junction continence in 42 patients with primary varicocele. Minerva Chir 50:469–473
Yetkin E, Waltenberger J (2008) Re: Is varicocele associated with underlying venous abnormalities? Varicocele and the prostatic venous plexus: H. Sakamoto and Y. Ogawa J Urol; 180: 1427–1431. J Urol 181:1963 (author reply 1963-4)
Gökçe A, Balbay MD (2009) Re: Is varicocele associated with underlying venous abnormalities? Varicocele and the prostatic venous plexus. H. Sakamoto and Y. Ogawa. J Urol 2008; 180: 1427–1431. J Urol 182:798–799 (author reply 799)
Dunn PF, Picologlou BF (1977) Variation in human semen viscoelastic properties with respect to time post ejaculation and frequency of ejaculation. Int J Fertil 22:217–224
Du Plessis SS, Gokul S, Agarwal A (2013) Semen hyperviscosity: causes, consequences, and cures. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 5:224–231
ELzanaty S, Malm J, Giwercman A (2004) Visco-elasticity of seminal fluid in relation to the epididymal and accessory sex gland function and its impact on sperm motility. Int J Androl 27:94–100
Lotti F, Corona G, Mancini M, Biagini C, Colpi GM, Innocenti SD, Filimberti E, Gacci M, Krausz C, Sforza A, Forti G, Mannucci E, Maggi M (2009) The association between varicocele, premature ejaculation and prostatitis symptoms: possible mechanisms. J Sex Med 6:2878–2887
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Ethical approval
The protocol was approved by the internal Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Condorelli, R.A., Calogero, A.E., Mongioi’, L. et al. Varicocele and concomitant dilation of the periprostatic venous plexus: effects on semen viscosity sperm parameters. J Endocrinol Invest 39, 543–547 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0401-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0401-9