Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fracture risk assessment before and after resolution of endogenous hypercortisolism: Is the FRAX® algorithm useful?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Fracture risk data following curative treatment of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) are scarce and the role of bisphosphonates in bone recovery after remission is controversial. We evaluated the effects of hypercortisolism remission in bone recovery in CS. Then, we assessed if the FRAX® algorithm calculated before the cure can predict fracture risk after cure.

Methods

Thirty-six patients with CS were retrospectively investigated. Bone turnover markers, bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (L1–L4) and left femur (both neck and total hip were considered), and fracture risk using FRAX® algorithm with femoral neck BMD were evaluated at diagnosis and after a median follow-up of 24 months (range 12–108 months) from hypercortisolism remission. Data about bone active therapy were analyzed.

Results

Hypercortisolism remission was associated with the improvement of all densitometric parameters and with the reduction of fracture risk. The percentage change in BMD and the fracture risk were not significantly different in bisphosphonate-treated vs. untreated patients. During follow-up, three fractured patients at baseline exhibited a new vertebral fracture. A baseline 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (FRAX® Major) of 17 % was able to predict the occurrence of a new vertebral fracture during follow-up after cure with 100 % sensitivity, 77 % specificity, 81 % positive predictive value and 100 % negative predictive value.

Conclusions

Osteoporosis and fracture risk may be reversible after curative treatment of CS, regardless of bisphosphonate therapy. We suggest applying the FRAX® algorithm to all active CS patients using a baseline FRAX® Major of 17 % as “intervention threshold”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaldi G, Angeli A, Atkinson AB et al (2003) Diagnosis and complications of Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5593–5602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaldi G, Mancini T, Tirabassi G et al (2012) Advances in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of Cushing’s syndrome complications. J Endocrinol Invest 35:434–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boscaro M, Arnaldi G (2009) Approach to the patient with possible Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:3121–3131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Valassi E, Santos A, Yaneva M et al (2011) The European Registry on Cushing’s syndrome: 2-year experience. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Eur J Endocrinol 165:383–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Canalis E, Bilezikian JP, Angeli A et al (2004) Perspectives on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Bone 34:593–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Staa TP, Laan RF, Barton IP et al (2003) Bone density threshold and other predictors of vertebral fracture in patients receiving oral glucocorticoid therapy. Arthritis Rheum 48:3224–3229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trementino L, Appolloni G, Ceccoli L et al (2014) Bone complications in patients with Cushing’s syndrome: looking for clinical, biochemical, and genetic determinants. Osteoporos Int 25(3):913–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermus AR, Smals AG, Swinkels LM et al (1995) Bone mineral density and bone turnover before and after surgical cure of Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2859–2865

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Somma C, Pivonello R, Loche S et al (2003) Effect of 2 years of cortisol normalization on the impaired bone mass and turnover in adolescent and adult patients with Cushing’s disease: a prospective study. Clinical Endocrinol Oxf 58:302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristo C, Jemtland R, Ueland T et al (2006) Restoration of the coupling process and normalization of bone mass following successful treatment of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome: a prospective, long-term study. Eur J Endocrinol 154:109–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawamata A, Iihara M, Okamoto T et al (2008) Bone mineral density before and after surgical cure of Cushing’s syndrome due to adrenocortical adenoma: prospective study. World J Surg 32:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Randazzo ME, Grossrubatscher E, Dalino Ciaramella P et al (2012) Spontaneous recovery of bone mass after cure of endogenous hypercortisolism. Pituitary 15:193–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vestergaard P, Lindholm J, Jørgensen JO et al (2002) Increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 146:51–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D et al (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23:2257–2276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Somma C, Colao A, Pivonello R et al (1998) Effectiveness of chronic treatment with alendronate in the osteoporosis of Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol Oxf 48:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tóth M, Grossman A (2013) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: lessons from Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol Oxf 79(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scillitani A, Mazziotti G, Di Somma C et al (2013) Treatment of skeletal impairment in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism: when and how? Osteoporos Int 25(2):441–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW et al (2008) The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1526–1540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S (2013) Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom 16(8):455–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level. Technical Report. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK 2007. http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf

  22. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization 2007 WHO Scientific Group on the Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. Summary Meeting Report, Brussels, Belgium. www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/index.html. Accessed 5–7 May 2004

  24. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK et al (2010) American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res Hoboken 62:1515–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Compston J (2011) Clinical question: what is the best approach to managing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis? Clin Endocrinol Oxf 74:547–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiodini I, Torlontano M, Carnevale V et al (2008) Skeletal involvement in adult patients with endogenous hypercortisolism. J Endocrinol Invest 31:267–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Francucci CM, Pantanetti P, Garrapa GG et al (2002) Bone metabolism and mass in women with Cushing’s syndrome and adrenal incidentaloma. Clin Endocrinol Oxf 57:587–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis 2013. http://www.nof.org/files/nof/public/content/resource/913/files/580.pdf

  30. Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C et al (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182:1864–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB et al (2006) Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 367:1605–1617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Biller BM, Grossman AB, Stewart PM et al (2008) Treatment of adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing’s syndrome: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2454–2462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A et al (2011) Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids. Osteoporos Int 22:809–816

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mihaela Voinea, PhD, of Excerpta Medica, who provided editorial assistance and styling prior to submission. This research was partially supported by PRIN (grant number 201098WFZ2_006).

Conflict of interest

The Authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The authors received editorial/writing support in the preparation of this manuscript provided by Excerpta Medica, funded by Novartis Oncology Region Europe. The authors did not receive honoraria related to the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Endocrinology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, Torrette di Ancona, 60020, Ancona, AN, Italy

    Laura Trementino, Letizia Ceccoli, Carolina Concettoni, Giorgia Marcelli, Grazia Michetti, Marco Boscaro & Giorgio Arnaldi

Authors
  1. Laura Trementino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Letizia Ceccoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolina Concettoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giorgia Marcelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Grazia Michetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marco Boscaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giorgio Arnaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Arnaldi.

Additional information

L. Trementino and L. Ceccoli contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trementino, L., Ceccoli, L., Concettoni, C. et al. Fracture risk assessment before and after resolution of endogenous hypercortisolism: Is the FRAX® algorithm useful?. J Endocrinol Invest 37, 957–965 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-014-0126-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-014-0126-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation