Abstract
The recent changes to the Behavior Analysis Certification Board Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts along with the calls to action for compassionate care have highlighted the need for a reevaluation of behavior research and clinical programs. We propose a behavior analytic definition of compassion where the relieving or prevention of distress is the reinforcer for the professional. One way of minimizing distress may be to require that assent be provided by a participant in an intervention. The definition of assent typically includes reference to willingness to participate in an intervention or activity. We provide a framework that goes beyond simple willingness to participate and distinguishes between apparent/implicit coercion and genuine assent by considering the alternatives described as degrees of freedom available to the participant. We distinguish between compulsion/explicit coercion, consent, and assent. Additionally, we will differentiate genuine consent and assent from apparent consent and assent in the design of compassionate behavioral programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Abdel-Jalil, A., Linnehan, A. M., Yeich, R., Hetzel, K., Amey, J., & Klick, S. (2023). Can there be compassion without assent? A nonlinear constructional approach. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00850-9
Ala’i-Rosales, S., Cihon, J. H., Currier, T. D., Ferguson, J. L., Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Weinkauf, S. M. (2019). The big four: Functional assessment research informs preventative behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(1), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00291-9
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & George, A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley.
de Fernandes, R. C., & Dittrich, A. (2018). Expanding the behavior-analytic meanings of “freedom”: The contributions of Israel Goldiamond. Behavior and Social Issues, 27(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8248
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Irvington Publishers.
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (2018). Authentic U.S. Government Information GPO. Federal Register.
Goldiamond, I. (1975). Alternative sets as a framework for behavioral formulations and research. Behaviorism, 3(1), 49–86.
Goldiamond, I. (1976). Protection of human subjects and patients: A social contingency analysis of distinctions between research and practice, and its implications. Behaviorism, 4(1), 1–41 http://www.jstor.org/stable/27758852
Goldiamond, I. (1984). Training parent trainers and ethicists in nonlinear analysis of behavior. In R. F. Dangel & R. A. Polster (Eds.), Parent training: Foundations of research and practice (pp. 504–546). Guilford Press.
Goldiamond, I. (2002). Toward a constructional approach to social problems: Ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behaviorism, 2(1), 1–84 (Original work published 1974).
Layng, T. V. J. (2019). Tutorial: Understanding concepts: Implications for behavior analysts and educators. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42(2), 345–363.
Layng, T. V. J. (2020, February 22). Coercion without aversive stimuli [Conference session]. Art and Science of Animal Training, Hurst, TX.
Layng, T. V. J., Andronis, P. T., Codd, R. T., & Abdel-Jalil, A. (2022). Nonlinear contingency analysis: Going beyond cognition and behavior in clinical practice. Routledge.
Layng, T. V. J., & Abdel-Jalil, A. (2022). Toward a constructional exposure therapy. Advances in Cognitive Therapy, 8–11.
Mager, R. F. (1997). Making instruction work (2nd ed.). Center for Effective Performance.
Markle, S. M., & Tiemann, P. W. (1969). Really understanding concepts: Or in frumious pursuit of the Jabberwock. (Slide/Tape instructional program) Tiemann Associates.
Markle, S. M., & Tiemann, P. W. (1970). "Behavioral" analysis of "cognitive" content. Educational Technology, 10(1), 41–45.
Mechner, F. (1962). Behavioral analysis for programmers. Basic Systems.
Merrill, M. D., Tennyson, R. D., & Posey, L. O. (1992). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Educational Technology.
Morris, C., Detrick, J. J., & Peterson, S. M. (2021). Participant assent in behavior analytic research: Considerations for participants with autism and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(4), 1300–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.859
Nishimuta, M., & Layng, T. V. (2021). On the distinction between the abstract tacts art and craft: A concept analysis. The Psychological Record, 71(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00491-w
Scallan, C. M., & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (2023). The constructional approach: A compassionate approach to behavior change. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00811-2
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sota, M., Leon, M., & Layng, T. V. J. (2011). Thinking through text comprehension II: Analysis of verbal and investigative repertoires. The Behavior Analyst Today, 12(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100707
Taylor, B. A., LeBlanc, L. A., & Nosik, M. R. (2019). Compassionate care in behavior analytic treatment: Can outcomes be enhanced by attending to relationships with caregivers? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00289-3
Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1991). Analyzing instructional content: A guide to instruction and evaluation. Morningside Press.
Funding
The authors did not receive support or funding from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors are indebted to Dr. T. V. Joe Layng for all his help, guidance, feedback, and mentoring during the conception and writing of this article.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Linnehan, A.M., Abdel-Jalil, A., Klick, S. et al. Foundations of Preemptive Compassion: A Behavioral Concept Analysis of Compulsion, Consent, and Assent. Behav Analysis Practice (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00890-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00890-1