Abstract
The present study sought to evaluate a sequence of training procedures on the emergence of foundational relational responses that underly more complex distinctive (i.e., difference) and hierarchical (i.e., categorical) relational frames. In a multiple baseline design, an initial baseline period with three children with autism showed that the participants did not select nonidentical stimuli from an array when presented the contextual cue “different.” Simple discrimination training was efficacious in establishing this response and the skill transferred to a novel set of stimuli without reinforcement. In a second baseline period, participants did not demonstrate conditional identical/nonidentical relational responses when provided the contextual cues “same” and “different.” Conditional discrimination training with all three participants was again efficacious in establishing the conditional reflexive and distinctive responses and the skill transferred to untrained stimuli. In a third baseline period, participants did not demonstrate correct conditional categorization/sorting. Like in the prior two training conditions, training was efficacious in establishing the target response with a generalized transfer to untrained stimuli.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44(1), 91–124. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-32107-001
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395355
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McHugh, L. (2004). Teaching derived relational responding to young children. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100275
Belisle, J., Dixon, M. R., Stanley, C. R., Munoz, B., & Daar, J. H. (2016). Teaching foundational perspective-taking skills to children with autism using the PEAK-T curriculum: Single-reversal “I–you” deictic frames. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(4), 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.324
Belisle, J., Paliliunas, D., Lauer, T., Giamanco, A., Lee, B., & Sickman, E. (2020). Derived relational responding and transformations of function in children: A review of applied behavior-analytic journals. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 36(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00123-z
Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2021). Research methods for the practicing behavior analyst. Emergent Press.
Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Schmick, A., Dixon, M. R., Alholail, A., Galliford, M. E., & Ellenberger, L. (2019). Establishing arbitrary comparative relations and referential transformations of stimulus function in individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(2), 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.655
Catania, A. C. (1995). Higher-order behavior classes: Contingencies, beliefs, and verbal behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 26(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(95)00033-V
Cummings, A. R., & Williams, W. L. (2000). Visual identity matching and vocal imitation training with children with autism: A surprising finding. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 109–122. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-10669-006
Dixon, M. R. (2016). PEAK relational training system: Transformation module. Shawnee Scientific Press.
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., McKeel, A., Whiting, S., Speelman, R., Daar, J. H., & Rowsey, K. (2017). An internal and critical review of the PEAK relational training system for children with autism and related intellectual disabilities: 2014–2017. The Behavior Analyst, 40(2), 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0119-4
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Whiting, S. W., & Rowsey, K. E. (2014). Normative sample of the PEAK relational training system: Direct training module and subsequent comparisons to individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(11), 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.07.020
Dixon, M. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., & Belisle, J. (2016). Derived rule-following and transformations of stimulus function in a children's game: An application of PEAK-E with children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.002
Fisher, W. W., Kodak, T., & Moore, J. W. (2007). Embedding an identity-matching task within a prompting hierarchy to facilitate acquisition of conditional discriminations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(3), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.40-489
Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: The first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 19–40). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Context Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). In Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Plenum Press.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: Working out the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.60
LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.144
Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., Mañas, I., Ruiz, F., & Valdivia-Salas, S. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants: Coordination, distinction, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. New Harbinger.
McLay, L., Church, J., & Sutherland, D. (2016). Variables affecting the emergence of untaught equivalence relations in children with and without autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 19(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2014.899649
McLoughlin, S., Tyndall, I., & Pereira, A. (2018). Piloting a brief relational operant training program: Analyses of response latencies and intelligence test performance. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 19(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1507087
Ming, S., Moran, L., & Stewart, I. (2014). Derived relational responding and generative language: Applications and future directions for teaching individuals with autism spectrum disorders. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 15(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2014.11434722
Ming, S., Mulhern, T., Stewart, I., Moran, L., & Bynum, K. (2018). Training class inclusion responding in typically developing children and individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.429
Ming, S., & Stewart, I. (2017). When things are not the same: A review of research into relations of difference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(2), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.367
Mulhern, T., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2017). Investigating relational framing of categorization in young children. The Psychological Record, 67(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0255-y
Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Derived more-less relational mands in children diagnosed with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-253
Persicke, A., Tarbox, J., Ranick, J., & Clair, M. S. (2012). Establishing metaphorical reasoning in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 913–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.12.007
Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: An analysis of articles published in the journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109
Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (Eds.). (2009). In Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. New Harbinger.
Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. The Psychological Record, 57(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395563
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Remedial & Special Education, 8(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258700800206
Slattery, B., & Stewart, I. (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.63
Slocum, S. K., Miller, S. J., & Tiger, J. H. (2012). Using a blocked-trials procedure to teach identity matching to a child with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(3), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-619
Soraci, S. A., Carlin, M. T., & Bray, N. W. (1992). Stimulus organization and relational learning. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 18, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(08)60115-9
Soraci, S. A., Deckner, C. W., Baumeister, A. A., & Bryant, J. T. (1991). Generalized oddity performance in preschool children: A bimodal training procedure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(91)90037-S
Soraci, S. A., Deckner, W., Haenlein, M., Baumeister, A. A., Murata-Soraci, K., & Blanton, R. L. (1987). Oddity performance in preschool children at risk for mental retardation: Transfer and maintenance. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(87)90044-8
Stanley, C. R., Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2018). Equivalence-based instruction of academic skills: Application to adolescents with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.446
Sutton, A., Pikula, A., Yi, Z., & Dixon, M. R. (2022). Evaluating the convergent validity of the PEAK comprehensive assessment (PCA): Intelligence, behavior challenges, and autism symptom severity. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 34, 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-021-09814-9
Zentall, T. R., Hogan, D. E., Edwards, C. A., & Hearst, E. (1980). Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.6.3.27
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The third author receives small royalties for the sale of the PEAK curriculum.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Belisle, J., Lang, L., Dixon, M.R. et al. Establishing Foundational Nonarbitrary Distinctive and Categorical Relational Responding in Children with Autism. Behav Analysis Practice 16, 1163–1174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00806-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00806-z