Skip to main content
Log in

Toward the Development of a Functional Analysis Risk Assessment Decision Tool

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 August 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Risk-benefit analyses are essential in the decision-making process when selecting the most effective and least restrictive assessment and treatment options for our clients. Clinical expertise, informed by the client’s preferences and the research literature, is needed in order to weigh the potential detrimental effects of a procedure against its expected benefits. Unfortunately, safety recommendations pertaining to functional analyses (FAs) are scattered or not consistently reported in the literature, which could lead some practitioners to misjudge the risks of FA. We surveyed behavior analysts to determine their perceived need for a risk assessment tool to evaluate risks prior to conducting an FA. In a sample of 664 Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) and doctoral-level Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA-Ds), 96.2% reported that a tool that evaluated the risks of proceeding with an FA would be useful for the professional practice of applied behavior analysis. We then developed an interactive tool to assess risk, which provides suggestions to mitigate the risks of an FA and validity recommendations. Subsequently, an expert panel of 10 BCBA-Ds reviewed the tool. Experts suggested that it was best suited as an instructional resource for those learning about the FA process and as a supporting resource for early practitioners’ clinical decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 August 2020

    This article was updated to correct the spelling of Rebecca R. Eldridge’s name in the author listing.

References

Download references

Author Note

We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the time and feedback of the 10 expert reviewers who reviewed beta versions of our risk assessment tool.

Funding

No sources of funding were utilized to present this information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Deochand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors know of no conflicts of interest that would present any financial or nonfinancial gain as a result of the potential publication of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

All research was conducted in compliance with ethical standards and institutional review boards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was updated to correct the spelling of Rebecca R. Eldridge’s name in the author listing.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSM 411 kb)

ESM 3

(XLSX 219 kb)

ESM 4

(XLSM 258 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deochand, N., Eldridge, R.R. & Peterson, S.M. Toward the Development of a Functional Analysis Risk Assessment Decision Tool. Behav Analysis Practice 13, 978–990 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00433-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00433-y

Keywords

Navigation