Abstract
Direct instruction (DI) is an evidence-based approach to education that has been shown to be effective across a wide variety of student populations. Growing evidence suggests that DI may be an efficacious strategy for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The current study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using DI with students with ASD who utilize speech-generating devices (SGDs); 3 students with ASD whose primary mode of communication was an SGD were exposed to the Language for Learning Curriculum, Lessons 1–10. Student performance on pre- and posttests was measured, as well as student performance on exercises within each lesson. The average time to complete an exercise, number of repetitions, number of terminated sessions, and student affect were also evaluated. Results indicated that all 3 students could participate and complete exercises with some modifications to support SGD use. The students demonstrated improved performance, positive affect, and overall timely completion of exercises. Taken together, these findings suggest that DI may be feasible for some students with ASD who utilize SGDs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arain, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2010). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
Bereiter, C., & Engelmann, S. (1966). Teaching disadvantaged children in the preschool. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 163–197.
Da Fonte, M. A., & Boesch, M. C. (2019). Effective augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook for school-based practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
Engelmann, S. (1980). Direct instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1976). DISTAR language: Level I. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1999). Language for learning. Columbus, OH: SRA.
Ganz, J. B., & Flores, M. M. (2009). The effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching language to children with autism spectrum disorders: Identifying materials. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-06002-2.
Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445503259836.
Hanley, G. P. (2010). Toward effective and preferred programming: A case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391754.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
Koegel, R. L., Vernon, T. W., & Koegel, L. K. (2009). Improving social initiations in young children with autism using reinforcers with embedded social interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1240–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0732-5.
O’Neill, R. E. (1990). Establishing verbal repertoires: Towards the application of general case analysis and programming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 113–126.
Prizant, B. M., & Wetherby, A. M. (2005). Critical considerations in enhancing communication abilities for persons with autism spectrum disorders. In F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & R. Paul (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed.).
Rose, V., Trembath, D., Keen, D., & Paynter, J. (2016). The proportion of minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder in a community-based early intervention programme. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 464-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12284.
Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., Peterman, R. K., & Gayman, M. D. (2015). Effectiveness of the Direct Instruction Language for Learning curriculum among children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614532498.
Smith, T., Scahill, L., Dawson, G., Guthrie, D., Lord, C., Odom, S., et al. (2007). Designing research studies on psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0173-3.
Williams, K. (2007). Expressive vocabulary test (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., et al. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z.
Yorkston, K., Dowden, P., Honsinger, M., Marriner, N., & Smith, K. (1988). A comparison of standard and user vocabulary lists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618812331274807.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no declared financial conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained for all individuals in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frampton, S.E., Shillingsburg, M.A. & Simeone, P.J. Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Direct Instruction for Individuals With Autism Utilizing Speech-Generating Devices. Behav Analysis Practice 13, 648–658 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00412-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00412-3