Abstract
Learners with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often struggle with communicating preferences integral to the transition planning process. Systematic preference assessments (SPAs) are objective methods for observing and documenting learner responses to a variety of environmental stimuli. An extensive literature-base exists supporting the inclusion of SPAs when identifying potentially reinforcing stimuli for educational programming. Although these methodologies are effective, in the transition planning process they may be useful beyond identifying potentially reinforcing stimuli. The following commentary provides an overview of the transition planning process, as well as how preference assessment may enhance that process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agran, M., & Krupp, M. (2011). Providing choice making in employment programs: The beginning or end of self-determination? Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 565–575.
Agran, M., Storey, K., & Krupp, M. (2010). Choosing and choice making are not the same: Asking “what do you want for lunch?” is not self-determination. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 33, 77–88.
Anderson, K. A., Shattuck, P. T., Cooper, B. P., Roux, A. M., & Wagner, M. (2014). Prevalence and correlates of postsecondary residential status among young adults with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 18, 562–570.
Bannerman, D. J., Sheldon, J. B., Sherman, J. A., & Harchik, A. E. (1990). Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: The rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 79–89.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board (2014). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. retrieved from: https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/170706r_compliance_code_english.pdf
Calder, L., Hill, V., & Pellicano, E. (2013). ‘Sometimes I want to play by myself’: Understanding what friendship means to children with autism in mainstream primary schools. Autism, 17, 296–316.
Call, N. A., Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., Reavis, A. R., & Findley, A. J. (2013). Direct assessment of preferences for social interactions in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 821–826.
Carter, E. W., Brock, M. E., & Trainor, A. A. (2014). Transition assessment and planning for youth with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 245–255.
Chiang, H. M., Cheung, Y. K., Hickson, L., Xiang, R., & Tsai, L. Y. (2012). Predictive factors of participation in postsecondary education for high school leavers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 685–696.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
Dillon, C. M., & Carr, J. E. (2007). Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness in individuals with developmental disabilities: A review. Behavioral Interventions, 22, 229–244.
Farley, M., Cottle, K. J., Bilder, D., Viskochil, J., Coon, H., & McMahon, W. (2018). Mid-life social outcomes for a population-based sample of adults with ASD. Autism Research, 11, 142–152.
Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 51–74.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.
Francis, G. L., Blue-Banning, M., & Turnbull, R. (2014). Variables within a household that influence quality-of-life outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities living in the community: Discovering the gaps. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 3–10.
Gerhardt, P. F., & Lainer, I. (2011). Addressing the needs of adolescents and adults with autism: A crisis on the horizon. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 41, 37–45.
Groskreutz, M. P., & Graff, R. B. (2009). Evaluating pictorial preference assessment: The effect of differential outcomes on preference assessment results. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 113–128.
Hall, J., Morgan, R. L., & Salzberg, C. L. (2014). Job-preference and job-matching assessment results and their association with job performance and satisfaction among young adults with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 301–312.
Hume, K., Boyd, B. A., Hamm, J. V., & Kucharczyk, S. (2014). Supporting independence in adolescents on the autism spectrum. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 102–113.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Karsten, A. M., Carr, J. E., & Lepper, T. L. (2011). Description of a practioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Behavior Modification, 35, 347–369.
Kochhar-Bryant, C. A., & Greene, G. (2009). Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities: A developmental process. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'reilly, M. F., Oliva, D., & Basili, G. (2005). An overview of research on increasing indices of happiness of people with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 83–93.
Lattimore, L. P., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2003). Assessing preferred work among adults with autism beginning supported jobs: Identification of constant and alternating task preferences. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 18, 161–177.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36.
Lohrmann-O’Rourke, S., & Gomez, O. (2001). Integrating preference assessment within the transition process to create meaningful school-to-life outcomes. Exceptionality, 9, 157–174.
Mazzotti, V. L., Rowe, D. A., Sinclair, J., Poppen, M., Woods, W. E., & Shearer, M. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 196–215.
Mithaug, D. E., & Hanawalt, D. A. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 153–162.
Neubert, D. A., & Leconte, P. J. (2013). Age-appropriate transition assessment: The position of the division on career development and transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 72–83.
Neuremberger, J. E., Smith, C. A., Czapar, K. N., & Klatt, K. P. (2012). Assessing preference for social interaction in children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 33–44.
Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A.M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years After high school. A Report From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009–3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
Ninci, J., Gerow, S., Rispoli, M., & Boles, M. (2017). Systematic review of vocational preferences on behavioral outcomes of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 875–894.
Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., & Green, C. W. (2001). Situational assessment of task preferences among adults with multiple severe disabilities in supported work. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 50–55.
Parsons, M. B., Reid, D. H., Bentley, E., Inman, A., & Lattimore, L. P. (2012). Identifying indices of happiness and unhappiness among adults with autism: Potential targets for behavioral assessment and intervention. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 15–25.
President’s Committee on Intellectual Disabilities. (1994). The national reform agenda and citizens with mental retardation: A journal of renewal for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author retrieved from: https://www.acl.gov/sites/default/files/programs/2017-04/reports_to_the_president_a5f1.pdf .
Reid, D. H., & Green, C. W. (2006). Live enjoyment, happiness, & antecedent behavior support. In J. K. Luiselli (Ed.), Antecedent assessment & intervention: Supporting children & adults with developmental disabiltiies in community settings. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes Publishing.
Reid, D. H., Parsons, M. B., Towery, D., Lattimore, L. P., Green, C. W., & Brackett, L. (2007). Identifying work preferences among supported workers with severe disabilities: Efficiency and accuracy of a preference-assessment protocol. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 22, 279–296.
Richman, D. M., Barnard-Brak, L., Abby, L., & Grubb, L. (2016). Multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment: Reducing the number of sessions to identify preferred stimuli. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 469–477.
Rose, V., Trembath, D., Keen, D., & Paynter, J. (2016). The proportion of minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder in a community-based early intervention programme. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 464–477.
Stancliffe, R. J., Lakin, K. C., Taub, S., Chiri, G., & Byun, S. Y. (2009). Satisfaction and sense of well being among Medicaid ICF/MR and HCBS recipients in six states. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 63–83.
Stancliffe, R. J., Lakin, K. C., Larson, S., Engler, J., Taub, S., & Fortune, J. (2011). Choice of living arrangements. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 746–762.
Tullis, C. A., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Basbigill, A. R., Yeager, A., Fleming, C. V., Payne, D., & Wu, P. F. (2011). Review of the choice and preference assessment literature for individuals with severe to profound disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 576–595.
Tullis, C. A., Cannella-Malone, H. I., & Fleming, C. V. (2012). Multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments: An examination of the relation between session number and effectiveness. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 337–345.
United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html .
Virués-Ortega, J., Pritchard, K., Grant, R. L., North, S., Hurtado-Parrado, C., Lee, M. S., et al. (2014). Clinical decision making and preference assessment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 151–170.
Wehman, P., Schall, C., McDonough, J., Molinelli, A., Riehle, E., Ham, W., & Thiss, W. R. (2013). Project SEARCH for youth with autism spectrum disorders increasing competitive employment on transition from high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 144–155.
Wehman, P. H., Schall, C. M., McDonough, J., Kregel, J., Brooke, V., Molinelli, A., et al. (2014). Competitive employment for youth with autism spectrum disorders: Early results from a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 487–500.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no declared financial conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
Human participants were not included in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tullis, C.A., Seaman-Tullis, R.L. Incorporating Preference Assessment into Transition Planning for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Behav Analysis Practice 12, 727–733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00353-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00353-6