This study examined the utility of a brief prerequisite assessment in predicting the subsequent effectiveness and rate of acquisition of mand training in each of three response modalities (sign, picture exchange, and vocalizations). Overall, the picture exchange was the most effective and efficient modality for acquiring the targeted mand. The vocal modality was the least effective except when the prerequisite assessment indicated that two-syllable vocal imitation was intact. The implications for selection of response modality for early mand training are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adkins, T., & Axelrod, S. (2001). Topography-based versus selection-based responding: comparison of mand acquisitions in each modality. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2, 259–266.
Bondy, A. (2001). PECS: potential benefits and risks. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2, 127–132.
Bourret, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Rapp, J. T. (2004). Evaluation of a vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-129.
Bristow, D., & Fristoe, M. (1984). Learning of Blissymbols and manual sign. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 145–151.
Carbone, V. J., Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J., Attanasio, V., & Kasper, T. (2010). Increasing the vocal responses of children with autism and developmental disabilities using manual sign mand training and prompt delay. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-705.
Chambers, M., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2003). Assessing the acquisition and generalization of two mand forms with adults with severe developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(03)00042-8.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(3), 213–231.
Filipek, P. A., Accardo, P. J., Baranek, G. T., Cook Jr., E. H., Dawson, G., Gordon, B., et al. (1999). The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 29, 439–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021943802493.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Ownes, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Gregory, M. K., DeLeon, I. J., & Richman, D. M. (2009). The influence of matching and motor imitation abilities on rapid acquisition of manual signs and exchange-based communicative responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-399.
Hagopian, L. P., Wilson, D. M., & Wilder, D. A. (2001). Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-229.
Kodak, T., Clements, A., Paden, A., LeBlanc, B., Mintz, J., & Tourssaint, K. (2015). Examination of the relation between an assessment of skills and performance on auditory-visual conditional discriminations for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.160.
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.
Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.
Sigafoos, J. (1998). Assessing conditional use of graphic mode requesting in a young boy with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10, 133–151.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sundberg, M. L. (1993). Selecting a response form for nonverbal persons: facilitated communication, pointing systems, or sign language? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 99–116.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program guide: a language and social skills assessment program for children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Concord: AVB Press.
Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The value of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for teaching children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445501255003.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts.
Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190030301.
Torelli, J. N., Lambert, J. M., DaFonte, A. M., Denham, K. N., Jedrzynski, T. M., & Houcins-Juarez, N. J. (2015). Assessing acquisition of and preference for mand topographies during functional communication training. Behavior Analysis in Practice.
Wraikat, R., Sundberg, C. T., & Michael, J. (1991). Topography-based and selection-based verbal behavior: a further comparison. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 1–17.
We thank Lani Fritts for his support and suggestions for this project. We thank Camille Summers-Godfrey, Heather Steffani, and Susanna Riley for help with conducting sessions and collecting data. Linda LeBlanc is now with LeBlanc Behavioral Consulting.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Valentino, A.L., LeBlanc, L.A., Veazey, S.E. et al. Using a Prerequisite Skills Assessment to Identify Optimal Modalities for Mand Training. Behav Analysis Practice 12, 22–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0256-6
- Mand training
- Picture exchange-based communication
- Prerequisite skills
- Sign language