Evaluating Three Methods of Stimulus Rotation when Teaching Receptive Labels
- 57 Downloads
The teaching of receptive labels (i.e., auditory-visual conditional discriminations) is common among early intervention programs for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Discrete trial teaching (DTT) is a common approach used to teach these receptive labels. Some have argued that the stimuli within the array, target and non-target, must be counterbalanced to prevent the development of undesired stimulus control. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to stimulus rotation to teach receptive labels to five young children diagnosed with ASD. These approaches included counterbalanced, fixed, and clinician’s choice. The results of an adapted alternating treatment design replicated across three stimulus sets and five participants indicated that all three methods of rotation were effective. Maintenance and generalization for targets taught in all three conditions was also assessed. The implications of the results with respect to current teaching practices in early intervention programs are discussed.
KeywordsAutism Conditional discrimination Receptive label DTT
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with 1964 Helsinki decoration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.
- Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. (1968). The token economy: a motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). Minneapolis: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Gutierrez, A., Jr., Hale, M. N., O’Brien, H. A., Fischer, A. J., Durocher, J. S., & Alessandri, M. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 630–638.Google Scholar
- LeBlanc, L. A. (2014). Early intervention for young children with autism: Best practices for receptive language instruction. Workshop presented at the Ninth Annual Association for Behavior Analysis International Autism Conference. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
- Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Alcalay, A., Mitchell, E., Townley-Cochran, D., Miller, K., Leaf, R., Taubman, M., & McEachin, J. (2017). Instructive feedback embedded within group instruction for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 304–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Taubman, M. (2016a). A progressive approach to discrete trial teaching: some current guidelines. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9, 361–372.Google Scholar
- Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Townley-Cochran, D., Miller, K., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., & Taubman, M. (2016b). An evaluation of positional prompts for teaching receptive identification to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 349–363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Leaf, J. A., Alcalay, A., Ravid, D., Dale, S., et al. (2016d). Comparing paired-stimulus preference assessments with in-the-moment reinforcer analysis on skill acquisition: a preliminary investigation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication, 33, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329.
- Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Taubman, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Ross, R. K., et al. (2016e). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 720–731.Google Scholar
- Leaf, R. B., & McEachin, J. J. (1999). A work in progress: behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: Different Roads to Learning.Google Scholar
- Lerman, D. C., Valentino, A. L., & Leblanc, L. A. (2016). Discrete trial training. In R. Lang, T. B. Hancock, & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 47–83). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: the Me Book. Austin: PRO-ED Books.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: basic intervention techniques. Austin: PRO-ED Books.Google Scholar
- MacDuff, G. S., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green, & R. M. Foxx (Eds.), Making a difference behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37–50). Austin: Pro Ed.Google Scholar
- Martin, N., & Brownell, R. (2011). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Novato: ATP Assessments.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1984). The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (survey form). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar