A Comparison of Two Procedures for Assessing Preference in a Classroom Setting
The purpose of this study was to compare a method of assessing preference within a large group format to individual preference assessments. Individual preference assessments were conducted by presenting an array of four edible stimuli to a participant and allowing the participant to select a preferred stimulus, with stimuli removed from the array based on selection criteria. Group preference assessments were conducted in a classroom of 19 students, with all students responding simultaneously to a prompt to identify a preferred stimulus using Plickers—unique Quick Response code cards that are read by an accompanying smartphone app. During the group procedure, stimuli in the array were restricted on the individual participant level. Results indicated that the group procedure was a valid and rapid method of assessing preference within a group of individuals. Although additional research is required, practitioners and researchers may consider use of Plickers as a promising means of evaluating preference within a group setting.
KeywordsIndividual reference assessment Group preference assessment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in the current study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent and assent was obtained for all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Call, N. A., Trosclair-Lasserre, N. M., Findley, A. J., Reavis, A. R., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2012). Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 763–777.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2016). Adjustable spinner. Retrieved from: https://www.nctm.org/Classroom-Resources/Interactives/Adjustable-Spinner/.
- Piazza, C. C., Roane, H. S., & Karsten, A. (2011). Identifying and enhancing the effectiveness of positive reinforcement. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 151–164). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Wehman, P. (1976). Selection of play materials for the severely handicapped: a continuing dilemma. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 11, 46–50.Google Scholar