Effects of a Lag Schedule with Progressive Time Delay on Sign Mand Variability in a Boy with Autism
For some children with autism, mand training can produce highly repetitive manding unless the environment is arranged in a manner that promotes mand variability. Prior research demonstrated that mand training using a lag schedule and progressive time delay increased variability in vocal manding in children with autism. Whether lag schedules have similar effects on sign mand topographies is unknown. The current study evaluated the effects of mand training with a Lag 1 schedule of reinforcement and progressive time delay (TD) on topographical variability and the development of a sign mand response class hierarchy in a boy with autism. The results suggest independent use of all sign mand topographies occurred, a mand response class hierarchy was developed, and topographically variant sign manding increased under the Lag 1 + TD schedule compared to a Lag 0 schedule of reinforcement. Implications for practitioners, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
KeywordsLag schedule Mand Operant variability Response class hierarchy Time delay
We thank the families for participating in our research, and Samantha Swinnea for her assistance with data collection. We also thank Allen Neuringer for his helpful insights and comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
We report no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adami, S., Falcomata, T. S., Muething, C. S., & Hoffman, K. (2017). An evaluation of lag schedules of reinforcement during functional communication training: Effects on varied mand responding and challenging behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10, 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0179-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baer, D. M. (1982). The imposition of structure on behavior and the demolition of behavior structures. In H. R. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Improving and assessing the quality of behavioral measurement. In Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 102–124). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Silbaugh, B. C., Falcomata, T. S., & Ferguson, R. H. (2017). Effects of a lag schedule of reinforcement with progressive time delay on topographical mand variability in children with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2017.1369190.
- Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar