Skip to main content
Log in

Social Thinking® Methodology: Evidence-Based or Empirically Supported? A Response to Leaf et al. (2016)

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. We typically refer to the process of thinking socially, and the cognitive acts and related production of social skills (behaviors) that this subsumes, as social thinking (lowercase), whereas the formal methodology based on these concepts is referred to as Social Thinking® (uppercase).

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position Statement]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

  • Anderson, S., & Morris, J. (2006). Cognitive behavior therapy for people with Asperger syndrome. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34(3), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: a fifteen-year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, D. W., & Risi, S. (2003). Treatment of adolescents and young adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. In M. A. Reinecke, R. M. Datillo, & A. Freeman (Eds.), Cognitive therapy with children and adolescence: a casebook for clinical practice (2nd ed., pp. 369–401). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, J. (2010). Examining the effectiveness of a social learning curriculum for improving social skills and self-regulation behaviors in middle school boys with autism spectrum disorder or social skill deficits, Psychology Dissertations. http://digitalcommons.pcom.edu/psychology_dissertations/14.

  • Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Cox, A., & Drew, A. (2000). Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavena-Deane, B. (2010). Using a social communication intervention to improve the social interactions and employment experiences of adolescents with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. http://dissertations.umi.com/ku: 11056

  • Crooke, P. J., & Olswang, L. B. (2015). Practice-based research: another pathway for closing the research–practice gap. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 58(6), S1871–S1882. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooke, P. J., & Winner, M. G. (2015). Research to frameworks to practice: Social Thinking’s layers of evidence. Retrieved April 15, 2016 from https://socialthinking.com/%7E/media/Files/Articles/Research%20to%20Frameworks%20to%20Practice%20Social%20Thinkings%20Layers%20of%20Evidence.ashx?la=en

  • Crooke, P., Hendrix, R., & Rachman, J. (2008). Brief report: measuring the effectiveness of teaching social thinking to children with Asperger syndrome (AS) and high functioning autism (HFA). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 581–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crooke, P. J., Winner, M. G., & Olswang, L. B. (2016). Thinking socially: teaching social knowledge to foster social behavioral change. Topics in Language Disorders, 36, 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollaghan, C. A. (2007). The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., … & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175.

  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaus, V. L. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult Asperger syndrome. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., White, A. L., & McAndrew, S. (2002). My social stories book. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (1996). Early behavioral intervention for autism: what does research tell us? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: a manual for parents and professionals. Austin: Pro-Ed.

  • Greenspan, S. I. (2003). Child care research: a clinical perspective. Child Development, 74(4), 1064–1068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, S. E. (2001). Autism/Aspergers: solving the relationship puzzle. Arlington: Future Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, R., Palmer, K., Tarshis, N., & Winner, M. G. (2013). The incredible flexible you: a social thinking curriculum for the preschool and early elementary years (thinking with eyes and smart guess). San Jose: Think Social Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 590–619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00285.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaale, A., Smith, L., & Sponheim, E. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of preschool-based joint attention intervention for children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 97–105. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02450.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63(3), 146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., & Durkin, K. (2004). Understanding of thought bubbles as mental representations in children with autism: implications for theory of mind. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(6), 637–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Harrower, J. K., & Carter, C. M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention I: overview of approach. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24(3), 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koning, C., Magill-Evans, J., Volden, J., & Dick, B. (2008). Efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy-based social skills intervention for school-aged boys with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(10), 1282–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusikko, S., Pollock-Wurman, R., Jussila, K., Carter, A. S., Mattila, M. L., Ebeling, H., … & Moilanen, I. (2008). Social anxiety in high-functioning children and adolescents with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(9), 1697-1709

  • La Roche, M. J., & Christopher, M. S. (2009). Changing paradigms from empirically supported treatment to evidence-based practice: a cultural perspective. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, R., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2000). Social language use in Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. Asperger syndrome, 125–155.

  • Leaf, J. B., Kassardjian, A., Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L., Cihon, J. H., Taubman, M., Leaf, R., et al. (2016a). Social Thinking: science, pseudoscience, or antiscience? Behavioral Analysis in Practice. doi:10.1007/s40617-010-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, J. B., Kassardjian, A., Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L., Cihon, J. H., Taubman, M., Leaf, R., et al. (2016b). Erratum to: Social Thinking: science, pseudoscience, or antiscience? Behavioral Analysis in Practice. doi:10.1007/s40617-016-0119-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. Y. S., Crooke, P. J., Lui, A. L. Y., Kan, P. P. K., Luke, K. L., Mak, Y. M., et al. (2015). The outcome of a social cognitive training for mainstream adolescents with social communication deficits in a Chinese community. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2015.1065960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopata, C., Thomeer, M. L., Volker, M. A., & Nida, R. E. (2006). Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral treatment on the social behaviors of children with Asperger disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(4), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1994). The theory of mind and joint-attention deficits in autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 181–203). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Autism Center (2011). Evidence-based practice and autism in schools guide. Retrieved from http://www.unl.edu/asdnetwork/documents/guidelines_resources/nac_guide.pdf

  • Norbury, C. F., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2002). Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: a comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37, 227–251. doi:10.1080/13682820210136269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S., & Mitchell, P. (1999). What children with autism understand about thoughts and thought bubbles. Autism, 3(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, K., & Estay, I. A. (2007). Counselling people on the autism spectrum: a practical manual. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, J., & Peterson, C. (2013). Further evidence of benefits of thought-bubble training for theory of mind development in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(2), 344–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., Rubin, E., Laurent, A. C., & Rydell, P. J. (2005). The SCERTS [TM] model: a comprehensive educational approach for children with autism spectrum disorders. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofronoff, K., Attwood, T., & Hinton, S. (2005). A randomised controlled trial of a CBT intervention for anxiety in children with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(11), 1152–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. M. A. (2011). Effectiveness of the social thinking intervention to increase social responsiveness of adolescents and young adults with Asperger syndrome: a mixed method approach. Doctoral dissertation, Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.

  • Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. Joint attention: its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130).

  • Wellman, H. M., Baron-Cohen, S., Caswell, R., Gomez, J. C., Swettenham, J., Toye, E., et al. (2002). Thought-bubbles help children with autism acquire an alternative to a theory of mind. Autism, 6(4), 343–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Novotny, C., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2005). EBP≠EST: reply to Christoph et al. (2005) and Weisz et al. (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G. (2007a). Thinking about you, thinking about me (2nd ed.). San Jose: Think Social Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G. (2007b). Social behavior mapping: connecting behavior, emotions, and consequences across the day. San Jose: Think Social Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G. (2008). A politically incorrect look at evidence-based practices and teaching social skills. San Jose: Think Social Publishing, Inc. (out of print, replaced by: Why teach social thinking? Questioning our assumptions about what it means to teach social skills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G. (2013). Why teach Social Thinking? Questioning our assumptions about what it means to teach social skills. San Jose: Think Social Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2008). You are a social detective: explaining social thinking to kids. San Jose: Think Social Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2009). Social Thinking®: a developmental treatment approach for students with social learning/social pragmatic challenges. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 16(2), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2014). Executive functioning and social pragmatic communication skills: exploring the threads in our social fabric. Perspectives on Language, Learning and Education, 21(2), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfberg, P. J. (2003). Peer play and the autism spectrum: the art of guiding children’s socialization and imagination. Kansas City: AAPC Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C., & Kasari, C. (2012). Play and joint attention of children with autism in the preschool special education classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(10), 2152–2161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., et al. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951–1966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yadlosky, K. (2012). Effects of the Superflex™ curriculum on the social cognition of primary students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorders. http://hdl.handle.net/10211.2/1231.

  • Zweber-Palmer, K., Tarshis, N., Hendrix, R., & Winner, M. G. (2016). We-thinkers series: social problem solvers curriculum. San Jose: Think Social Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela J. Crooke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Crooke is a full-time salaried employee of Think Social Publishing, Inc. While a contributing author on various books, articles, and papers, she receives no royalties.

Michelle Garcia Winner is the founder of the Social Thinking methodology and CEO of Think Social Publishing, Inc.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crooke, P.J., Winner, M.G. Social Thinking® Methodology: Evidence-Based or Empirically Supported? A Response to Leaf et al. (2016). Behav Analysis Practice 9, 403–408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0151-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0151-y

Keywords

Navigation