Abstract
The identification of putative reinforcers is a critical component of programming for individuals with disabilities. A multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessment is one option for identifying putative reinforcers; however, staff must be trained on the steps necessary to conduct the assessment for it to be useful in practice. This study examined the effectiveness of using video modeling with voice-over instruction (VMVO) to train two public school staff to conduct this assessment. Results demonstrate that VMVO was effective in training, producing generalized responding, maintenance, and high social validity ratings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
Deliperi, P., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K., Reeve, S., & DeBar, R. (2015). Training staff to implement a paired-stimulus preference assessment using video modeling with voiceover instruction. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 314–332. doi:10.1002/bin.1421.
Giannakakos, A. R., Vladescu, J. C., Kisamore, A. N., & Reeve, S. (2016). Using video modeling with voiceover instruction plus feedback to train staff to implement direct teaching procedures. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 126–134. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0097-5.
Graff, R. B., & Karsten, A. M. (2012). Evaluation of a self-instruction package for conducting stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 69–82. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-69.
Lerman, D. C., Tetreault, A., Hovanetz, A., Strobel, M., & Garro, J. (2008). Further evaluation of a brief, intensive teacher-training model. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 243–248. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-243.
Lerman, D. C., Vorndran, C. M., Addison, L., & Kuhn, S. C. (2004). Preparing teachers in evidence-based practices for young children with autism. School Psychology Review, 33, 510–526.
Lipschultz, J. L., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., & Dipsey, C. R. (2015). Using video modeling with voiceover instruction to train staff to conduct stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 505–532. doi:10.1007/s10882-015-9434-4.
Reimers, T. M., & Wacker, D. P. (1988). Parents’ ratings of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendations made in an outpatient clinic: a preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This article is based on a thesis submitted by the first author, under the supervision of the second author, at Caldwell University in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the Master of Arts in Applied Behavior Analysis.
Implications for practice:
1. Video modeling with voiceover instruction (VMVO) trained public school staff to implement a multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment in two sessions.
2. Training consisting of VMVO and a simulated consumer lead to generalized responding to an actual consumer.
3. The VMVO training produced staff trainee integrity that remained high up to 8 weeks after training.
4. The public school staff provided highly favorable ratings of the VMVO training.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bovi, G.M.D., Vladescu, J.C., DeBar, R.M. et al. Using Video Modeling with Voice-over Instruction to Train Public School Staff to Implement a Preference Assessment. Behav Analysis Practice 10, 72–76 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0135-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0135-y