Behavior Analysis in Practice

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 50–53 | Cite as

Using Computer Tablets to Assess Preference for Videos in Children with Autism

  • Sabine S. Chebli
  • Marc J. Lanovaz
BAP Brief Practices


Using computer tablets, we assessed preference for videos in five children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Then, we provided access to most preferred and less preferred videos contingent on sitting on one of two chairs within a concurrent schedule design. All participants spent consistently more time sitting on the chair associated with the video selected the most often during the preference assessment, indicating that practitioners may use the tablet-based assessment procedure to identify potential video reinforcers for children with ASD in applied settings.


Autism Preference assessment Reinforcer Tablet Video 



This research project was supported in part by a doctoral research scholarship from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec–Société et Culture to the first author and an Insight Development Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (no. 430-2013-000836) to the second author. We thank Marie-Michèle Dufour for her assistance with the data collection and the École de l’Étincelle for their collaboration in conducting the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Faculté des Arts et Sciences of the Université de Montréal and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Brodhead, M. T., Al-Dubayan, M. N., Mates, M., Abel, E. A., & Brouwer, L. (2015). An evaluation of a brief video-based multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, D. R., Donaldson, J. M., & Kahng, S. (2015). Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. doi: 10.1002/jaba.246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dattilo, J. (1986). Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 445–448. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, T. N., Fuentes, L., & Durand, S. (2014). Examination of systematic durations of presession reinforcer access on functional communication training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 263–270. doi: 10.1007/s10882-013-9360-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Sleven, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Cronin, A. B. (2006). The effects of presenting high-preference items, paired with choice via computer-based video programming on task completion of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 7–13. doi: 10.1177/10883576060210010201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Snyder, K., Higbee, T. S., & Dayton, E. (2012). Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 413–418. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École de PsychoéducationUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations