Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support as Behavior Analysis in Practice: Why Is This Even Controversial?

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inclusion of Positive Behavioral Intervention and Supports as a type of applied behavior analysis has often spurred considerable controversy. This controversy seems related to at least three areas of contention: measurement issues, views on aversive control, and the overall target of treatment. The present paper discusses these three areas in light of Horner and Sugai’s target article and the current state of the field of applied behavior analysis. In the end, the authors are left wondering why this is even an ongoing controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., Anderson, J. L., et al. (2002). Positive behavior support: evolution of an applied science. Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R.H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: an example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4.

  • Kurtz, P. F., Boelter, E. W., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Chinn, M. D., & Hagopian, L. P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2935–2942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., & Vorndran, C. M. (2002). On the status of knowledge for using punishment: implications for treating behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 431–464.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J. (2013). Go forth and be variable. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 137–143.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perone, M., & Hursh, D. E. (2012). Single-case experimental designs. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, volume 1. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (2000). Coercion and its fallout. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M. (1993). Remembrances of issues past: celebrating JABA’s 25th anniversary. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 543–544.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest, and the current work involves neither human nor animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave 4050 Dole Developmental Center, Lawrence, KS, USA

    David P. Jarmolowicz

  2. Community Living Opportunities, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Allison S. Tetreault

Authors
  1. David P. Jarmolowicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allison S. Tetreault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Jarmolowicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jarmolowicz, D.P., Tetreault, A.S. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support as Behavior Analysis in Practice: Why Is This Even Controversial?. Behav Analysis Practice 8, 86–87 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0056-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0056-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation