Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Dissemination Requires Effective Talk: a Comparison of Behavior-Analytic Journals

  • BAP Brief Practices
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explored language used in three behavior-analytic journals (the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA), the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB), and Behavior Analysis in Practice (BAP)) to evaluate differences in factors related to the ease of comprehension. Using a linguistic analysis tool, we compared the first three paragraphs of the introductions of research articles in ten issues of each of the journals. JEAB was found to use language that was less concrete, meaningful, and imageable than the two applied journals. Implications for the field are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 445–448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Danks, J. H. (1969). Grammaticalness and meaningfulness in the comprehension of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Reed, D., & Smith, T. (2013). From the eyes of the front line: BCBAs evaluate BAP. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: its community, its functions, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmolowicz, D. P., Kahng, S. W., Ingvarsson, E. T., Goysovich, R., Heggemeyer, R., Gregory, M. K., & Taylor, S. J. (2008). Effects of conversational versus technical language on treatment preference and integrity. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 190–199. doi:10.1352/2008.46:190-199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klee, H., & Eyesenk, M. W. (1973). Comprehension of abstract and concrete sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 522–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z., & Graesser, A. (2013). Coh-Metrix version 3.0. Retrieved July 23, 2014, from http://cohmetrix.com

  • Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Nunes, E. J., Randall, P. A., & Pardo, M. (2012). The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine, and beyond. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(1), 125–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957/1992). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Diller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diller, J.W., Salters-Pedneault, K. & Gallagher, A.R. Effective Dissemination Requires Effective Talk: a Comparison of Behavior-Analytic Journals. Behav Analysis Practice 7, 103–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0020-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0020-5

Keywords

Navigation