The Effects of Scenic Picture Prompts on Variability During the Acquisition of Intraverbal Categorization for Children With Autism

Abstract

Researchers have demonstrated the efficacy of picture prompts on the acquisition of intraverbals (Coon & Miguel in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666, 2012; Goldsmith, LeBlanc, & Sautter in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 1–13, 2007; Ingvarsson & Hollobaugh in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664, 2011; Ingvarsson & Le in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93, 2011; Miguel, Petursdottir, & Carr in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41, 2005; Partington & Bailey in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18, 1993). However, no one (to our knowledge) has determined the effects of picture prompts on the variability of responding during intraverbal categorization. We evaluated the use of a scenic picture prompt on response variability during the acquisition of intraverbal categorization with 4 children diagnosed with autism. All children mastered the task and initially demonstrated varied responding. However, responding eventually became invariant for all children. These results demonstrate the efficacy of a scenic picture prompt for teaching children with autism intraverbal categorization and for producing initial response variability. Additional research should be conducted to determine teaching procedures that promote continued varied responding for individuals with autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonitis, J. J. (1951). Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Braam, S. J., & Poling, A. (1983). Development of intraverbal behavior in mentally retarded individuals through transfer of stimulus control procedures: Classification of verbal responses. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 4, 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-3092(83)90030-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, R. A., & Kodak, T. (2015). Using instructive feedback to increase response variability during intraverbal training for children with autism spectrum disorder. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0039-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Contreras, B. P., & Betz, A. M. (2016). Using lag schedules to strengthen the intraverbal repertoires of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus-control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-657

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dracobly, J. D., Dozier, C. L., Briggs, A. M., & Juanico, J. F. (2017). An analysis of procedures that affect response variability. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, H., Chou, W., & Lee, G. T. (2015). Effects of tact prompts on acquisition and maintenance of divergent intraverbal responses by a child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615610540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldsmith, T. R., LeBlanc, L. A., & Sautter, R. A. (2007). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grannan, L., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). Emergent intraverbal responses via tact and match-to-sample instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-601

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-659

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Le, D. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Karsten, A. M., & Carr, J. E. (2009). The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, R., McComas, J. J., & Jawor, J. (2002). The effects of differential and lag reinforcement schedules on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, R., & Sturmey, P. (2006). The effects of lag schedules and preferred materials on variable responding in students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(3), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0080-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luciano, M. C. (1986). Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of productive intraverbal behavior through transfer of stimulus control procedures. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-3092(86)90014-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Neuringer, A., Kornell, N., & Olufs, M. (2001). Stability and variability in extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.27.1.79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392883

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson, S. P., Rodriguez, N. M., & Pawich, T. L. (2019). Effects of modeling rote versus varied responses on response variability and skill acquisition during discrete-trial instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez, N. M., & Thompson, R. H. (2015). Behavioral variability and autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Susa, C., & Schlinger Jr., H. D. (2012). Using a lag schedule to increase variability of verbal responding in an individual with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 28, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams, K. T. (2007). Expressive vocabulary test (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Maria Malachowski and Kally Sorensen for their help with data collection. Internal funding from the University of Nebraska Medical Center’s Chancellor’s Office provided partial support for this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn R. Glodowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Humans participated in the clinical evaluation, and legal guardians provided informed consent for the children to participate in the evaluation.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 3
figure3

Scenic picture prompts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glodowski, K.R., Rodriguez, N.M. The Effects of Scenic Picture Prompts on Variability During the Acquisition of Intraverbal Categorization for Children With Autism. Analysis Verbal Behav 35, 134–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00120-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Divergent control
  • Intraverbal categorization
  • Picture prompts
  • Response variability