Abstract
The importance of the intraverbal relation is missed in most theories of language. Skinner (1957) attributes this to traditional semantic theories of meaning that focus on the nonverbal referents of words and neglect verbal stimuli as separate sources of control for linguistic behavior. An analysis of verbal stimulus control is presented, along with its distinction from nonverbal stimulus control and motivational control. It is suggested that there are at least four different types of increasingly complex verbal discriminations relevant to speaker and listener behavior: simple, compound, verbal conditional, and verbal function-altering (Eikeseth & Smith, 2013; Schlinger & Blakely, 1994). Separate but interlocking accounts of how these specific types of verbal stimuli produce different evocative and function-altering effects for the speaker and for the listener are provided. Finally, the effects of weakening verbal stimulus control and the loss of intraverbal behavior are considered, especially as they relate to dementia, aphasia, and traumatic brain injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre, A. A., Valentino, A. L., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2016). Empirical investigations of the intraverbal: 2005-2015. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32. doi:10.1007/s40616-016-0064-4.
Axe, J. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: a review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 159–174.
Baker, J. C., LeBlanc, L. A., & Raetz, P. B. (2008). A behavioral conceptualization of aphasia. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 147–158.
Bloom, L. (1974). Developmental relationship between receptive and expressive language. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives, acquisition, retardation, and intervention (pp. 285–311). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Sloan Publishing.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-657.
Dixon, M. R., Baker, J. C., & Sadowski, K. A. (2011). Applying Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior to persons with dementia. Behavior Therapy, 42, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.05.002.
Eikeseth, S., & Smith, D. P. (2013). An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: implications for practice and applied research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 125–135.
Esch, B. E., LaLonde, K. B., & Esch, J. W. (2010). Speech and language assessment: a verbal behavior analysis. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 166–191.
Greer, R. D., Yuan, L., & Gautreaux, G. (2005). Novel dictation and intraverbal responses as a function of a multiple exemplar history. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 99–116.
Gross, A. C., Fuqua, R. W., & Merritt, T. A. (2013). Evaluation of verbal behavior in older adults. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 85–99.
Hedge, H. M. (2010). Language and grammar: a behavioral analysis. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 90–113.
Ingvarsson, E. T., & Le, D. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics for establishing intraverbal responding in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.
Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 411–429. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-411.
Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology. E. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kisamore, A. N., Karsten, A. M., Mann, C. C., & Conde, K. A. (2013). Effects of a differential observing response on intraverbal performance of preschool children: a preliminary investigation. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 101–108.
Kodak, T., Fuchtman, R., & Paden, A. (2012). A comparison of intraverbal training procedures for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 155–160. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-155.
Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (1999). A work in progress. New York: DRL Books.
LeBlanc, L. A., Raetz, P. B., & Feliciano, L. (2011). Behavioral gerontology. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 472–488). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lechago, S. A., Carr, J. E., Kisamore, A. N., & Grow, L. L. (2015). The effects of multiple exemplar instruction on the relation between listener and intraverbal categorization repertoires. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 76–95. doi:10.1007/s40616-015-0027-1.
Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays. Austin TX: Pro-ed.
Lowenkron, B. (1984). Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 1–18. doi:10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1.
Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327.
Lowenkron, B. (2006). Joint control and the selection of stimuli from their description. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 129–151.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivating functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149.
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.
Michael, J. (1995). What every student in behavior analysis ought know: a system for classifying the multiple effects of behavioral variables. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 272–284.
Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-401.
Michael, J. (2004). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Kalamazoo, MI: Association for Behavior Analysis International.
Michael, J. (2007). Motivating operations. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 374–391). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22.
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and listener discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.
Oah, S., & Dickinson, A. M. (1989). A review of empirical studies of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 53–68.
Oleson, C. R., & Baker, J. C. (2013). Teaching mands to older adults with dementia. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 113–127.
Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Palmer, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: a review of Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189–204. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.81-189.
Palmer, D. C. (2012). The role of atomic repertoires in the interpretation of complex behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 35, 59–73.
Palmer, D. C. (2016). On intraverbal control and the definition of the intraverbal. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 1–11.
Pérez-González, L. A., & García-Asenjo, L. (2016). Emergence of intraverbals with antonyms derived from relations with verbal and nonverbal stimuli. The Psychological Record, 66, 351–368. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0177-0.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: how the mind creates language. NY: Harper-Collins.
Sautter, R. A., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2006). Empirical applications of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior with humans. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 35–48.
Sautter, R. A., LeBlanc, L. A., Jay, A. A., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2011). The role of problem solving in complex intraverbal repertoires. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 227–244. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-227.
Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Listening is behaving verbally. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 145–161.
Schlinger, H. D., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.
Schlinger, H. D., & Blakely, E. (1994). A descriptive taxonomy of environmental operations and its implications for behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 43–57.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). Behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: a theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–202). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Sundberg, M. L. (2014). The verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: the VB-MAPP (2nd ed.). Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Sundberg, C. T., & Sundberg, M. L. (1990). Comparing topography-based verbal behavior with stimulus selection-based verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 31–41.
Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.
Sundberg, M. L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Arguelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.
Valentino, A. L., Shillingsburg, M., & Call, N. A. (2012). Comparing the effects of echoic prompts and echoic prompts plus modeled prompts on intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 431–435. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-431.
Acknowledgments
I thank Jessica Linneweber, David C. Palmer, Cindy A. Sundberg, and Carl T. Sundberg for their contributions to this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This article is part of a special section on the intraverbal relation in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sundberg, M.L. Verbal Stimulus Control and the Intraverbal Relation. Analysis Verbal Behav 32, 107–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0065-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0065-3