The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 154–170 | Cite as

Emergence of Intraverbal Responding Following Tact Instruction with Compound Stimuli

  • Bailey Devine
  • Charlotte L. Carp
  • Kiley A. Hiett
  • Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
Special Section: The Intraverbal Relation

Abstract

Effective intraverbal responding often requires control by multiple elements of a verbal stimulus. The purpose of this study was to examine the emergence of such intraverbal relations following tact instruction with compound stimuli and to analyze any resulting error patterns. Participants were seven typically developing children between 3 and 5 years of age. After being taught to tact four overlapping compound stimuli that differed along color and shape dimensions, participants were tested for emergent intraverbal responding. Three participants performed with high accuracy and four with intermediate accuracy when correct intraverbal responding required control by multiple elements (i.e., color names and shape names) of the verbal stimulus. Five participants performed with high accuracy when intraverbal responding required control by only a single stimulus element, and all participants showed emergence of reverse intraverbal relations when the response required naming only a single stimulus element (i.e., color or shape). There was an insufficient number of errors to perform detailed error analyses at the individual level, but overall, the first element of a verbal stimulus was more likely to exert control over the response than the second element, and color words were more likely to exert control than shape words. Results suggest that individual stimulus elements acquired independent control over the responses that had been established as tacts.

Keywords

Intraverbal Stimulus control Tact 

References

  1. Axe, J. B. (2007). Conditional discriminations in the intraverbal relation: a review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 159–174.Google Scholar
  2. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test-4. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.Google Scholar
  3. Eikeseth, S., & Smith, D. P. (2013). An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: implications for practice and applied research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 125–135.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Grannan, L., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). Emergent intraverbal responses via tact and match-to-sample instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 601–605. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.) (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ingvarsson, E. T., Koelker, R. L., Carp, C. L., Petursdottir, A. I., & Macias, H. (2016). Evaluation of a blocked-trials procedure to establish complex stimulus control over intraverbal responses with children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior.Google Scholar
  7. Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 255–278. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. May, R. J., Hawkins, E., & Dymond, S. (2013). Brief report: effects of tact training on emergent intraverbal vocal responses in adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 996–1004. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1632-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–73. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearce, J. M. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 73–95. doi:10.3758/BF03192911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petursdottir, A. I., & Haflidadottir, R. D. (2009). A comparison of four strategies for teaching a small foreign-language vocabulary. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 685–690. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Petursdottir, A. I., Ólafsdóttir, A. R., & Aradóttir, B. (2008). The effects of tact training and listener training on the emergence of bidirectional intraverbal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 411–415. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-411.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). The verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: the VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bailey Devine
    • 1
  • Charlotte L. Carp
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kiley A. Hiett
    • 1
  • Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.McNeese State UniversityLake CharlesUSA
  3. 3.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations