On Intraverbal Control and the Definition of the Intraverbal
Behavior analysts should distinguish between the intraverbal, as a class of verbal operants, and intraverbal control, the potentiating effect, however slight, of a verbal antecedent on a verbal response. If it is to serve an explanatory function, the term intraverbal, as a class of verbal operants, should be restricted to those cases in which a verbal antecedent, as the result of a history of contiguous or correlated usage, is sufficient to evoke the putative intraverbal response. Intraverbal control is pervasive in verbal behavior, but since it is typically just one of many concurrent variables that determine the form of a verbal response, such multiply controlled responses are not usefully called “intraverbals.” Because intraverbals and their controlling variables have invariant formal properties, they are conceptually simple, but they nevertheless play a central role in the interpretation of complex phenomena such as the structural regularities in verbal behavior (i.e., grammar).
KeywordsAutoclitic frames Grammar Intraverbal Intraverbal control Skinner Verbal behavior Verbal operants
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Carr, J. E., & Miguel, C. F. (2013). The analysis of verbal behavior and its therapeutic applications. In G. J. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis: Vol. 2. Translating principles into practice (pp. 329–352). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
- Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (2011). Learning and complex behavior. Richmond: Ledgetop Publishing Originally published in 1994.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
- Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 255-278. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-255.
- Michael, J. (2004). Concepts and principles of behavior analysis (rev. ed.). Kalamazoo: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.Google Scholar
- Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: a selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
- Palmer, D. C. (2007). Verbal behavior: what is the function of structure? European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 161–175.Google Scholar
- Palmer, D. C. (2009). Response strength and the concept of the repertoire. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 49–60.Google Scholar
- Palmer, D. C. (2013). Some implications of a behavioral analysis of verbal behavior for logic and mathematics. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 267–276.Google Scholar
- Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1948). The William James lectures. Cambridge: B. F. Skinner Foundation Unpublished manuscript available at http://www.bfskinner.org/archives/unpublished-works.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M. L. (2007). Verbal behavior. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis 2nd ed (pp. 526–547). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar