The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 265–274 | Cite as

Teaching Children with Autism to Follow Rules Specifying a Behavior and Consequence

  • Sarah C. Wymer
  • Jonathan Tarbox
  • Gracie A. Beavers
  • Christopher A. Tullis
Brief Report

Abstract

Rule-governed behavior (RGB) results from contact with a verbal description of a contingency as opposed to prior contact with that contingency. Despite its importance, research on the establishment of RGB with learners who do not display the skill is limited. Tarbox, Zuckerman, Bishop, Olive, and O’Hora (The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 125-139, 2011) used multiple-exemplar training (MET) to teach children with autism spectrum disorder to follow rules specifying an antecedent and a behavior. We conducted a systematic replication of the Tarbox et al. study with three boys diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and extended those methods to rules specifying a behavior and either a preferred or nonpreferred consequence (e.g., “If you clap, then you get candy”). In baseline, participants typically followed a given instruction regardless of whether the consequence was preferred or nonpreferred. Following MET, all participants responded accurately to novel rules, indicating that MET may be an effective method to establish basic RGB repertoires.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder Multiple-exemplar training Rule following Rule-governed behavior 

References

  1. Greer, D. R., Stolfi, L., & Pistoljevic, N. (2007). Emergence of naming in preschoolers: A comparison of multiple and single exemplar instruction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 109–131. doi:10.1080/15021149.2007.11434278.Google Scholar
  2. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Springer Publishing. doi:10.1007/b108413
  3. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1080/07317107.2012.654458.Google Scholar
  4. Kanfer, F. H., & Karoly, P. (1972). Self-control: A behavioristic excursion into the lion's den. Behavior Therapy, 3, 398–416. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(72)80140-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(70)80039-9.Google Scholar
  7. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: A language and social skills assessment program for children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Concord: AVB Press. doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2479.Google Scholar
  10. Tarbox, J., Zuckerman, C. K., Bishop, M. R., Olive, M. L., & O'Hora, D. P. (2011). Rule-governed behavior: Teaching a preliminary repertoire of rule-following to children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 125–139.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah C. Wymer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan Tarbox
    • 3
  • Gracie A. Beavers
    • 1
  • Christopher A. Tullis
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Marcus Autism CenterAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.FirstSteps for KidsLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations