Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproductive Health Disparities in the USA: Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity Predicts Age of Menarche and Live Birth Ratios, but Not Infertility

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-identified race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) contribute to disparities in several health domains, although research on their effects on women’s reproductive function has largely focused on links between SES and age of menarche. Here, we assessed whether race/ethnicity, SES, and downstream correlates of SES such as food security and health-insurance security are associated with age of menarche, infertility, and live birth ratios (ratios of recognized pregnancies resulting in live births) in the USA. We used cross-sectional data from 1694 women aged 12–18 years for menarche (2007–2016), 974 women aged 23–45 for infertility (2013–2016), and 1714 women aged 23–45 for live birth ratios (2007–2016) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We estimated multiple linear and logistic regressions with survey weights to test these associations. When controlling for lifestyle (activity levels, smoking, alcohol consumption) and physiological factors (diabetes, weight status), non-Hispanic (NH) black and Hispanic girls reported a significantly lower age of menarche by about 4.3 (standard error [SE] = 0.08, p < 0.001), and 3.2 months (SE = 0.09, p < 0.001), respectively, relative to NH white girls. NH black women reported live birth ratios 9% (SE = 0.02, p < 0.001) lower than NH white women. Women with unstable health insurance reported live birth ratios 6% (SE = 0.02, p = 0.02) lower than women with stable health insurance. Race/ethnicity, SES, and its downstream correlates were not associated with infertility. One hypothesized explanation for observed disparities in age of menarche and live birth ratios is the embodiment of discrimination faced by NH black women within the USA. Our findings also underscore the importance of health insurance access for favorable reproductive health outcomes. Future work should elucidate the role of embodied discrimination and other downstream correlates of SES in modulating women’s reproductive health outcomes to inform strategies to mitigate health disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krieger N. Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:668–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marmot MG. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365:1099–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO Health Commission, “Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.

  4. Stringhini S, et al. Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality : a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1.7 million men and women. Lancet. 2017;389:7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(6):816–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Everson SA, Maty SC, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Epidemiological evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53:891–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulz AJ, Mentz G, Lachance L, Johnson J, Gaines C, Israel BA. Associations between socioeconomic status and allostatic load: effects of neighborhood poverty and tests of mediating pathways. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):1706–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. United States Census Bureau, “Educational attainment in the United States: 2016,” 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Fontenot, J. Semega, and M. Kollar, “Income and poverty in the United States: 2017,” 2018.

  10. Fisher CB, Wallace SA, Fenton RE. Discrimination distress during adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2000;29:679–95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Minior T, Galea S, Stuber J, Ahern J, Ompad D. Racial differences in discrimination experiences and responses among minority substance users. Ethn Dis. 2003;13(4):521–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee RT, Perez AD, Boykin CM, Mendoza-Denton R. On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210698.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Monk EP. The cost of color: skin color, discrimination, and health among African-Americans. Am J Sociol. 2015;121(2):396–444.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paradies Y. A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:888–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraus JF, Borhani NO, Franti CE. Socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;111(4):407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Geronimus AT, Bound J, Waidmann TA, Colen CG, Steffick D. Inequality in life expectancy, functional status, and active life expectancy across selected black and white populations in the United States. Demography. 2001;38:227–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303(3):235–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, Bound J. ‘Weathering’ and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):826–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wronka I, Pawlin R. Menarcheal age and socio-economic factors in Poland. Ann Hum Biol. 2005;32(5):630–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rokade S, Mane A. A study of age at menarche, the secular trend and factors associated with it. Internet J Biol Anthropol. 2008;3(2):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onat T, Ertem B. Age at menarche: relationships to socioeconomic status, growth rate in stature and weight, and skeletal and sexual maturation. Am J Hum Biol. 1995;7(6):741–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Downing J, Bellis MA. Early pubertal onset and its relationship with sexual risk taking, substance use and anti-social behaviour: a preliminary cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(446):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deardorff J, Abrams B, Ekwaru JP, Rehkopf D. Socioeconomic status and age at menarche: an examination of multiple indicators in an ethnically diverse cohort. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(10):727–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsieh C, Trichopoulos D, Katsouyanni K, Yuasa S. Age at menarche, age at menopause, height and obesity as risk factors for breast cancer: associations and interactions in an international case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1990;46:796–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zehr JL, Culbert KM, Sisk CL, Klump KL. An association of early puberty with disordered eating and anxiety in a population of undergraduate women and men. Horm Behav. 2007;52(4):427–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee AC, et al. Community-based stillbirth rates and risk factors in rural Sarlahi, Nepal. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011, 2011;(113):3.

  27. Luo Z, Wilkins R, Kramer MS. Effect of neighbourhood income and maternal education on birth outcomes: a population-based study. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174(10):1415–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ, Fang MZ, Gardner WP, Pajer K. African-American/White differences in the age of menarche: accounting for the difference. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(7):1263–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chumlea WC, Schubert CM, Roche AF, Kulin HE, Lee PA, Himes JH, et al. Age of menarche and racial comparisons in US girls. Pediatrics. 2003;111(11):110–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mukherjee S, Velez Edwards DR, Baird DD, Savitz DA, Hartmann KE. Risk of miscarriage among black women and white women in a us prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(11):1271–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross KM, Dunkel Schetter C, McLemore MR, Chambers BD, Paynter RA, Baer R, et al. Socioeconomic status, preeclampsia risk and gestational length in black and white women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019;6(6):1182–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bitler M, Schmidt L. Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(4):858–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilcox LS, Mosher WD. Use of infertility services in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82(1):122–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cho JI, Basnyat B, Jeong C, di Rienzo A, Childs G, Craig SR, et al. Ethnically Tibetan women in Nepal with low hemoglobin concentration have better reproductive outcomes. Evol Med Public Heal. 2017;2017(1):82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  35. LaVeist TA. Disentangling race and socioeconomic status: a key to understanding health inequalities. J Urban Health. 2005;82(2):iii26–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. National Center for Health Statistics, “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation,” Hyattsville, MD, 2015.

  37. Jones CP. Race,’ racism, and the practice of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(4):299–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. National Center for Health Statistics, “NHANES survey methods and analytic guidelines,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/AnalyticGuidelines.aspx. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2020].

  39. Olson CM. Nutrition and health outcomes associated with food insecurity and hunger. J Nutr. 1999;129(2):521S–4S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Seligman HK, Laraia BA, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr. 2010;140(2):304–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Duru OK, Vargas RB, Kermah D, Pan D, Norris KC. Health insurance status and hypertension monitoring and control in the United States. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:348–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilper AP, Woolhandler S, Lasser KE, Mccormick D, Bor DH. Health insurance and mortality in US adults. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12):2289–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bickel B, Nord M, Price C, Hamilton W, Cook J. Guide to measuring holdhold food secruity, revised 2000. Alexandria, VA: USDA; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Urquia ML, O’Campo PJ, Heaman MI. Revisiting the immigrant paradox in reproductive health: the roles of duration of residence and ethnicity. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(10):1610–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cunningham SA, Ruben JD, Narayan KMV. Health of foreign-born people in the United States: a review. Health Place. 2008;14(4):623–35.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Markides KS, Coreil J. The health of hispanics in the southwestern United States: an epidemiologic paradox. Public Health Rep. 1986;101(3):253–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. Physical activity, body mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology. 2002;13(2):184–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pierce MB, Leon DA. Age at menarche and adult BMI in the Aberdeen children of the 1950s cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(4):733–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Smoking and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5S):254–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jensen TK, Hjollund NHI, Henriksen TB, Scheike T, Kolstad H, Giwercman A, et al. Does moderate alcohol consumption affect fertility? Follow up study among couples planning first pregnancy. BMJ. 1998;317:505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1399–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Thune I, Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Habitual physical activity and estradiol levels in women of reproductive age. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15(5):439–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Livshits A, Seidman DS. Fertility issues in women with diabetes. Women Health. 2009;5(6):701–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vidmar S, Carlin J, Hesketh K, Cole T. Standardizing anthropometric measures in children and adolescents with new functions for egen. Stata J. 2004;4(1):50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Butler L, Popkin BM, Poti JM. Associations of alcoholic beverag consumption with dietary intake, waist circumference, and body mass index in US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2012. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(3):409–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. International Expert Committee. International expert committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1327–34.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Evenson KR, Wen F. National trends in self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors among pregnant women: NHANES 1996-2006. Prev Med (Baltim). 2010;50(3):123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans,” Washington, DC, 2008.

  59. De Souza MJ, Toombs RJ, Scheid JL, O’Donnell E, West SL, Williams NI. High prevalence of subtle and severe menstrual disturbances in exercising women: confirmation using daily hormone measures. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):491–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. R. Williams, “Analyzing proportions: fractional response and zero one inflated beta models,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats3/fractionalresponsemodels.pdf. [Accessed: 24-Feb-2020].

  61. Villadsen AR, Wulff J. Fractional regression models in strategic management research. Acad Manag Proc. 2018;2018:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Farmer MM, Ferraro KF. Are racial disparities in health conditional on socioeconomic status? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):191–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bell CN, Thorpe RJ, Bowie JV, LaVeist TA. Race disparities in cardiovascular disease risk factors within socioeconomic status strata. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28:147–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Muller CJ, MacLehose RF. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):962–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. N. Krieger, “Discrimination and health inequities,” in Social Epidemiology, 2nd ed., L. F. Berkman, I. Kawachi, and M. M. Glymour, Eds. Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 63–125.

  66. Gravlee CC. How race becomes biology: embodiment of social inequality. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;139:47–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chaney C, Lopez M, Wiley KS, Valeggia C. Systematic review of chronic discrimination and changes in biology during pregnancy among African American women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019;6(6):1208–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. D’Angelo DV, et al. Patterns of health insurance coverage around the time of pregnancy among women with live-born infants--pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 29 states, 2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(4):2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Atrash HK, Johnson K, Mike M, Cordero JF, Howse J. Preconception care for improving perinatal outcomes: the time to act. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(S1):3–11.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Adams EK, Dunlop AL, Strahan AE, Joski P, Applegate M, Sierra E. Prepregnancy insurance and timely prenatal care for Medicaid births: before and after the Affordable Care Act in Ohio. J Women's Health. 2019;28(5):654–64.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. MD: Hyattsville; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E, Reproduction ESHRE, Force ST. Why do people postpone parenthood ? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):848–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Buttke DE, Sircar K, Martin C. Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and age at menarche in adolescent girls in NHANES (2003-2008). Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(11):1613–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Messerlian C, Souter I, Gaskins AJ, Williams PL, Ford JB, Chiu YH, et al. Urinary phthalate metabolites and ovarian reserve among women seeking infertility care. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(1):75–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lathi RB, Liebert CA, Brook F, Ph D, Taylor JA, Ph D. Conjugated bisphenol A in maternal serum in relation to miscarriage risk. Fertil Steril. 2004;102(1):123–8.

    Google Scholar 

  76. James-Todd TM, Chiu Y, Zota AR. Racial/ethnic disparities in environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and women’s reproductive health outcomes: epidemiological examples across the life course. Curr Epidemiol Reports. 2016;3(2):161–80.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ellison PT. On fertile ground: a natural history of human reproduction. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hjollund NHI, Jensen TK, Bonde JPE, Henriksen TB, Andersson AM, Kolstad HA, et al. Distress and reduced fertility: a follow-up study of first-pregnancy planners. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(1):47–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Smeenk JMJ, Verhaak CM, Vingerhoets AJJM, Sweep CGJ, Merkus JMWM, Willemsen SJ, et al. Stress and outcome success in IVF: the role of self-reports and endocrine variables. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(4):991–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Nepomnaschy PA, Welch KB, Mcconnell DS, Low BS, Strassmann BI, England BG. Cortisol levels and very early pregnancy loss in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(10):2938–3942.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Roney JR, Simmons ZL. Elevated psychological stress predicts reduced estradiol concentrations in young women. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol. 2015;1:30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Xiao E, Xia-Zhang L, Ferin M. Inadequate luteal function is the initial clinical cyclic defect in a 12-day stress model that includes a psychogenic component in the Rhesus monkey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):2232–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(10):2090–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asher Y. Rosinger.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (NCHS Research Ethics Review Board) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shirazi, T.N., Rosinger, A.Y. Reproductive Health Disparities in the USA: Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity Predicts Age of Menarche and Live Birth Ratios, but Not Infertility. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 8, 33–46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00752-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00752-4

Keywords

Navigation