Ethnic Harassment, Ethnic Identity Centrality, and Well-Being

  • Hans-Joachim Wolfram
  • Kenisha Linton
  • Nona McDuff


In this study, we examined the direct effect of (positive vs. negative) evaluation of potentially harassing experiences due to ethnic background on impaired well-being as well as the moderating effect of ethnic identity centrality on the relationship between (lower vs. higher) frequency of potentially harassing experiences and impaired well-being. Using a gender-balanced sample with equal proportions of black and minority ethnic and white undergraduate students (N = 240), we found that, expectedly, ethnic identity centrality intensified the effects of higher frequency of potentially harassing experiences on lower self-esteem and lower positive affect. Unexpectedly, however, gender identity centrality buffered the effects of higher frequency as well as more negative evaluation of potentially harassing experiences on lower self-esteem, indicating that gender identity centrality may be a protective resource, even though it is not specific to ethnic harassment. Exploratory analyses revealed that for black and minority ethnic respondents with high ethnic identity centrality and for white respondents with low ethnic identity centrality, there were associations between more negative evaluation of potentially harassing experiences and lower self-esteem and lower positive affect. This finding might indicate that ethnic identity centrality was a risk factor in black and ethnic minority respondents, but a protective factor in white respondents.


Ethnic harassment Identity centrality Well-being Discrimination 



The authors would like to thank Mayra Ruiz-Castro for her thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding Information

This research was supported by the Faculty of Business and Law and the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Unit at Kingston University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All respondents filled in the questionnaire online. E-mails inviting to participate were sent through student support services. The e-mails contained an explanation of the aim of the study, along with the assurance that participation would be voluntary, that respondents could withdraw from participating at any time, that their responses would be treated confidentially, and that data would be analysed at aggregate level. Potential respondents willing to participate accessed an online questionnaire through a link at the end of the invitation e-mail.


  1. 1.
    Schmitt MT, Branscombe NR, Postmes T, Garcia A. The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):921–48. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perry SP, Hardeman R, Burke AE, Cunningham B, Burgess DJ, van Ryn M. The impact of everyday discrimination and racial identity centrality on African American medical student well-being: a report from the medical student CHANGE study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016;3(3):519–26. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009;135:532–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCoy AK, Major B. Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(8):1005–17. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burrow AL, Ong AD. Racial identity as a moderator of daily exposure and reactivity to racial discrimination. Self Identity. 2010;9(4):383–402. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berdahl JL, Moore C. Workplace harassment: double jeopardy for minority women. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(2):426–36. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weiss HM, Suckow K, Cropanzano R. Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J Appl Psychol. 2006;84:786–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider K, Hitlan RT, Radhakrishnan P. An examination of the nature and correlates of ethnic harassment experiences in multiple contexts. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):3–12. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sellers RM, Shelton JN. The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(5):1079–92. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrell SP. A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: implications for the well-being of people of color. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70(1):42–57. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzgerald LF, Gelfand MJ, Drasgow F. Measuring sexual harassment: theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 1995;17(4):425–45. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fitzgerald LF, Swan S, Magley VJ. But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In: O’Donohue W, editor. Sexual harassment: theory, research, and treatment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1997. p. 5–28.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner JC, Oaks PJ. The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. Br J Soc Psychol. 1986;25(3):237–52. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thoits PA. On merging identity theory and stress research. Soc Psychol Q. 1991;54(2):101–12. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martire LM, Stephens MAP, Townsend AL. Centrality of women’s multiple roles: beneficial and detrimental consequences for psychological well-being. Psychol Aging. 2000;15(1):148–56. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szymanski, D. M., & Lewis, J. A. (2015). Gendered racism, coping, identity centrality, and African American college women’s psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sellers RM, Caldwell CH, Schmeelk-Cone KH, Zimmerman MA. Racial identity, racial discrimination, perceived stress, and psychological distress among African American young adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2003;43:302–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seaton EK. Perceived racial discrimination and racial identity profiles among African American adolescents. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2009;15(2):137–44. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sellers, R. M., Copeland-Linder, N., Martin, P. P., & L’Heureux Lewis, R. (2006). Racial identity matters: The relationship between racial discrimination and Psychological functioning in African American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 187–216.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the moderating hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57. Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Jonge J, Dormann C. Stressors, resources, and strain at work: a longitudinal test of the triple match principle. Int J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(6):1359–74. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higher Education Statistics Agency. HESA Student Record 2011/12 – reference 35929 [unpublished data set]. Cheltenham, U.K.: HESA Information Services; 2013.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Higher Education Funding Council for England (2015). Equality and diversity data tables: Staff and student profiles. Retrieved from
  25. 25.
    Maxwell JA. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(2):147–63. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sellers RM, Rowley SAJ, Chavous TM, Shelton JN, Smith MA. Multidimensional inventory of black identity: a preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(4):805–15. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Settles IH. Use of an intersectional framework to understand black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles. 2006;54(9-10):589–601. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH. Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(2):151–61. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–70. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fiske ST, Lee TL. Stereotypes and prejudice create workplace discrimination. In: Brief AP, editor. Diversity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 13–52. Scholar
  31. 31.
    Swim JK, Aikin KJ, Hall WS, Hunter BA. Sexism and racism: old-fashioned and modern prejudices. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68(2):199–214. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mossakowski KN. Coping with perceived discrimination: does ethnic identity protect mental health? J Health Soc Behav. 2003;44(3):318–31. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Major B, Quinton WJ, Schmader T. Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2003;39(3):220–31. Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosenfield S. Triple jeopardy? Mental health at the intersection of gender, race, and class. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1791–801. Scholar
  35. 35.
    Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q. 2002;64:464–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pearson CM, Porath CL. On the nature, consequences and remedies of workplace incivility: no time for “nice”? Think again. Acad Manag Exec. 2005;19:7–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Joachim Wolfram
    • 1
  • Kenisha Linton
    • 2
  • Nona McDuff
    • 1
  1. 1.Kingston UniversityKingston-upon-ThamesUK
  2. 2.University of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations