Advertisement

Exploring Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials by Ethnicity

  • Katrina L. ParieraEmail author
  • Sheila T. Murphy
  • Jingbo Meng
  • Margaret L. McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

African-Americans and Hispanic-Americans are disproportionately affected by cancer, yet underrepresented in cancer clinical trials. Because of this, it is important to understand how attitudes and beliefs about clinical trials vary by ethnicity. A national, random sample of 860 adults was given an online survey about attitudes toward clinical trials. We examined willingness to participate in clinical trials, attitudes toward clinical trials, trust in doctors, attitudes toward alternative and complementary medicine, and preferred information channels. Results indicate that African-American and Hispanic-American participants have more negative attitudes about clinical trials, more distrust toward doctors, more interest in complementary and alternative medicine, and less willingness to participate in clinical trials than white/non-Hispanics, although specific factors affecting willingness to participate vary. The channels people turn to for information on clinical trials also varied by ethnicity. These results help explain the ethnic disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment by highlighting some potential underlying causes and drawing attention to areas of importance to these groups.

Keywords

Clinical trials Ethnicity Trust Information sources Hispanic-American African-American 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Annenberg Schools for Communication at the University of Southern California and the University of Pennsylvania and the Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands for their contributions to the Annenberg National Health Communication Survey.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in this study were approved by the institution review board.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Chow CJ, Habermann EB, Abraham A, Zhu Y, Vickers SM, Rothenberger DA, et al. Does enrollment in cancer trials improve survival? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:774–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:141–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oakley A, Wiggins M, Turner H, Rajan L, Barker M. Including culturally diverse samples in health research: a case study of an urban trial of social support. Ethn. Health. 2003;8:29–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, Powe NR. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Advani AS, Atkeson B, Brown CL, Peterson BL, Fish L, Johnson JL, et al. Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials. Cancer. 2003;97:1499–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wallington SF, Luta G, Noone A, Caicedo L, Lopez-class M, Sheppard V, et al. Assessing the awareness of and willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials among immigrant Latinos. J Community Health. 2012;37:335–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:78–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mobley LR, Kuo T-M. Demographic disparities in late-stage diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancers across the USA. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016;1–12.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2011 [Internet]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov.libproxy.usc.edu/minorityhealth/CHDIReport.html.
  10. 10.
    Roden DM, Altman RB, Benowitz NL, Flockhart DA, Giacomini KM, Johnson JA, et al. Pharmacogenomics: challenges and opportunities. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:749–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown M, Moyer A. Predictors of awareness of clinical trials and feelings about the use of medical information for research in a nationally representative US sample. Ethn Health. 2010;15:223–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meng J, McLaughlin ML, Pariera KL, Murphy ST. A comparison between Caucasians and African Americans in willingness to participate in cancer clinical trials: the roles of knowledge, distrust, information sources, and religiosity. J Health Commun. 2016;21:669–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Byrne MM, Kornfeld J, Vanderpool R, Belanger M. Discussions of cancer clinical trials with the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun. 2012;17:319–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janet Yang Z, McComas K, Gay G, Leonard JP, Dannenberg AJ, Dillon H. From information processing to behavioral intentions: exploring cancer patients’ motivations for clinical trial enrollment. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79:231–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobs EA, Rolle I, Ferrans CE, Whitaker EE, Warnecke RB. Understanding African Americans’ views of the trustworthiness of physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:642–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobs EA, Mendenhall E, Mcalearney AS, Rolle I, Whitaker EE, Warnecke R, et al. An exploratory study of how trust in health care institutions varies across African American, Hispanic and white populations. Commun Med. 2011;8:89–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richardson MA, Sanders T, Palmer JL, Greisinger A, Singletary SE. complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2505–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davis EL, Oh B, Butow PN, Mullan BA, Clarke S. Cancer patient disclosure and patient-doctor communication of complementary and alternative medicine use: a systematic review. Oncologist. 2012;17:1475–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine a systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 2012;11:187–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richardson A, Allen JA, Xiao H, Vallone D. Effects of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on health information-seeking, confidence, and trust. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23:1477–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Malley AS, Kerner JF, Johnson L. Are we getting the message out to all?: health information sources and ethnicity. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:198–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murphy ST, Cody M, Frank LB, Glik D, Ang A. Predictors of emergency preparedness and compliance. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newport F. Democrats Racially Diverse; Republicans Mostly White [Internet]. Gallup. 2013 [cited 2016 Jan 7]. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/160373/democrats-racially-diverse-republicans-mostly-white.aspx
  24. 24.
    Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DMM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2458–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perry JE, Cox D, Cox AD. Trust and transparency: patient perceptions of physicians’ financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies. J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42:475–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Samuel-Hodge CD, Keyserling TC, Park S, Johnston LF, Gizlice Z, Bangdiwala SI. A randomized trial of a church-based diabetes self-management program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:439–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langford AT, Resnicow K, Beasley DD. Outcomes from the Body & Soul Clinical Trials Project: a university-church partnership to improve African American enrollment in a clinical trial registry. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:245–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gorelick PB, Harris Y, Burnett B, Bonecutter FJ. The recruitment triangle: reasons why African Americans enroll, refuse to enroll, or voluntarily withdraw from a clinical trial. An interim report from the African-American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS). J Natl Med Assoc. 1998;90:141–5Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keller PA, Lehmann DR. Designing effective health communications: a meta-analysis. J Public Policy Mark. 2008;27:117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramsey TM, Snyder JK, Lovato LC, Roumie CL, Glasser SP, Cosgrove NM, et al. Recruitment strategies and challenges in a large intervention trial: systolic blood pressure intervention trial. Clin Trials. 2016;13:319–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bachour CC, Bachmann GA, Foster DC, Wan JY, Rawlinson LA, Brown CS. Recruitment methods in a clinical trial of provoked vulvodynia: Predictors of enrollment. Clin Trials. 2016;1740774516663461.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown SD, Partee PN, Feng J, Quesenberry CP, Hedderson MM, Ehrlich SF, et al. Outreach to diversify clinical trial participation: a randomized recruitment study. Clin. Trials. 2015;12:205–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrina L. Pariera
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sheila T. Murphy
    • 2
  • Jingbo Meng
    • 3
  • Margaret L. McLaughlin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Organizational Sciences and CommunicationThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Communication, Annenberg School for Communication and JournalismUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of CommunicationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations