Trends and Progress in Reducing Teen Birth Rates and the Persisting Challenge of Eliminating Racial/Ethnic Disparities
- 429 Downloads
We examined progress made by the Milwaukee community toward achieving the Milwaukee Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative’s aggressive 2008 goal of reducing the teen birth rate to 30 live births/1000 females aged 15–17 years by 2015. We further examined differential teen birth rates in disparate racial and ethnic groups.
We analyzed teen birth count data from the Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health system and demographic data from the US Census Bureau. We computed annual 2003–2014 teen birth rates for the city and four racial/ethnic groups within the city (white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Hispanic/Latina, Asian non-Hispanic). To compare birth rates from before (2003–2008) and after (2009–2014) goal setting, we used a single-system design to employ two time series analysis approaches, celeration line, and three standard deviation (3SD) bands.
Milwaukee’s teen birth rate dropped 54 % from 54.3 in 2003 to 23.7 births/1000 females in 2014, surpassing the goal of 30 births/1000 females 3 years ahead of schedule. Rate reduction following goal setting was statistically significant, as five of the six post-goal data points were located below the celeration line and points for six consecutive years (2010–2014) fell below the 3SD band. All racial/ethnic groups demonstrated significant reductions through at least one of the two time series approaches. The gap between white and both black and Hispanic/Latina teens widened.
Significant reduction has occurred in the overall teen birth rate of Milwaukee. Achieving an aggressive reduction in teen births highlights the importance of collaborative community partnerships in setting and tracking public health goals.
KeywordsTeen birth Teen pregnancy Trend analysis Adolescent Health disparities Racial disparities Race/ethnicity Goals
Funding for this project was provided primarily by the Center for Urban Population Health, which is a partnership of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Aurora Health Care, Inc.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 5.Logan C, Holcombe E, Manlove J, Ryan S. The consequences of unintended childbearing: a white paper, 2007: ChildTrends, 2007. Available at: http://www.childtrends.org/?publications=the-consequences-of-unintended-childbearing-a-white-paper.
- 6.Terry-Humen E, Manlove J, Moore KA. Playing catch-up: how children born to teen mothers fare. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; 2005.Google Scholar
- 9.Perper K, Peterson K, Manlove J. Diploma attainment among teen mothers, 2010, Child trends fact sheet. 2010. Available at: http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/child_trends-2010_01_22_FS_diplomaattainment.pdf.Google Scholar
- 13.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2014. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics. 2015;64(12).Google Scholar
- 14.CDC. Reduced disparities in birth rates among teens aged 15-19 years in the United States. CDC; 2016. Accessed from: www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/prevent-teen-pregnancy/reduced-disparities-birth-rates.htm.
- 16.French K. Exploring socioeconomic characteristics of ethnically divided neighbourhoods. In: SI Lloyd CD, Wong DW, editors. Social-spatial segregation: concepts, processes and outcomes. Bristol: Policy Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 17.Shuger L. Teen pregnancy and high school dropout: what communities can do to address these issues. Washington, DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy and America’s Promise; 2012.Google Scholar
- 18.Greer DM et al. Milwaukee Health Report 2013: health disparities in Milwaukee by socioeconomic status. Milwaukee: Center for Urban Population Health; 2013.Google Scholar
- 19.CDC. About teen pregnancy: Teen Pregnancy in the United States. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). 2016. CDC; 2016. Retrieved June 13, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/about/.
- 21.United Way of Greater Milwaukee. Teen pregnancy prevention. Milwaukee; 2013, Available at http://unitedwaymilwaukee.org/TeenPregnacyPrevention.
- 22.Martinez G, Copen CE, JC Abma. Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006-2010. National survey of family growth. National center for health statistics. Vital and Health Stat. 2011;23(31):1–35.Google Scholar
- 23.Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ. Birth rates for U.S. teenagers reach historic lows for all age and ethnic groups. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief. 2012;89:1–8.Google Scholar
- 24.Bloom M, Fischer J, Orme JG. Evaluating practice: guidelines for the accountable professional. 6th ed. 2009.Google Scholar
- 29.Boonstra HD. Leveling the playing field: the promise of long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2013;16(4):13–8.Google Scholar
- 30.Boonstra HD. Emergency contraception: steps being taken to improve access. Guttmacher Rep Public Policy. 2002;5(5):10–3.Google Scholar
- 34.Oringanje C et al. Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4.Google Scholar
- 36.Krby, D., Emerging Answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Washington, DC; 2007. p. 26. Report available at: https://thenationalcampaign.org/resource/emerging-answers-2007%E2%80%94full-report. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
- 40.United Way of Greater Milwaukee. Healthy Girls. Milwaukee: United Way of Greater Milwaukee; 2013. Avaiable at https://www.unitedwaymilwaukee.org/HealthyGirls.htm?docid=178.Google Scholar
- 41.Percheski C, Kimbro R. How did the great recession affect fertility? Focus. 2014;30(2):26–30.Google Scholar