Skip to main content

Concurrence on Nonconcurrence in Multiple-Baseline Designs: A Commentary on Slocum et al. (2022)

Abstract

Slocum et al. (this issue) provide well-reasoned arguments for the use of nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs in behavior analytic work, despite historical preference for concurrent designs (i.e., simultaneous baseline initiation) and contemporary guidelines in related fields suggesting that nonconcurrent designs are insufficient for evaluating functional relations (What Works Clearinghouse, 2020). I provide a commentary, highlighting major contributions of this article and suggesting areas of further consideration. In sum, I agree with authors that researchers should avoid wholesale dismissal of nonconcurrent designs. I also agree that understanding how multiple-baseline designs control for and allow for detection of threats to internal validity is critical so that authors can apply the variation of the design that allows them to draw confident conclusions about relations between independent and dependent variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Carr, J. E. (2005). Recommendations for reporting multiple-baseline designs across participants. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 20(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, T. J. (2007). Experimental control and threats to internal validity of concurrent and nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon, J. C., & Rapp, J. T. (2018). Application of multiple baseline designs in behavior analytic research: Evidence for the influence of new guidelines. Behavioral Interventions, 33(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Descriptive analysis of single subject research designs. Education and Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 187–202.

  • Harvey, M. T., May, M. E., & Kennedy, C. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000044735.51022.5d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1981). Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 193–211 10.1037/0022-006X.49.2.193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Machalicek, W., Ferron, J., & Johnson, A. (2021). Single case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades. Journal of School Psychology, 89, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (Eds.). (2018). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.

  • Ledford, J. R., & Zimmerman, K. N. (2022). Rethinking rigor in multiple baseline designs across participants. https://osf.io/e98nw/

  • Ledford, J. R., Barton, E. E., Severini, K. E., Zimmerman, K. N., & Pokorski, E. A. (2019). Visual display of graphic data in single case design studies: Systematic review and expert preference analysis. Education & Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 315–327 https://www.jstor.org/stable/26822511

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., Lambert, J. M., Pustejovsky, J. E., Zimmerman, K. N., Hollins, N. A., & Barton, E. E. (2022). Single case design research in special education: Next generation standards and considerations. https://osf.io/bt9hf/

  • Pustejovsky, J. E., Swan, D. M., & English, K. W. (2021). An examination of measurement procedures and characteristics of baseline outcome data in single-case research. Behavior Modification. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519864264

  • Shadish, W. R., & Sullivan, K. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 12(3), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(81)90055-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). Standards handbook (v. 4.1). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer R. Ledford.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Jennifer R. Ledford is the editor of a single-case design textbook which is cited in this commentary, and for which she receives royalties.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ledford, J.R. Concurrence on Nonconcurrence in Multiple-Baseline Designs: A Commentary on Slocum et al. (2022). Perspect Behav Sci 45, 661–666 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00342-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00342-1

Keywords

  • Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs
  • Single case designs
  • Internal validity