Eckard and Lattal (2020) summarized the behavioristic view of hypothetical constructs and theories, and then, in a novel and timely manner, applied this view to a critique of internal clock models of temporal control. In our three-part commentary, we aim to contribute to the authors’ discussion by first expanding upon their view of the positive contributions afforded by constructs and theories. We then refine and question their view of the perils of reifying constructs and assigning them causal properties. Finally, we suggest to behavior analysts four rules of conduct for dealing with mediational theories: tolerate constructs proposed with sufficient reason; consider them seriously, both empirically and conceptually; develop alternative, behavior-analytic models with overlapping empirical domains; and contrast the various models. Through variation and selection, behavioral science will evolve.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Timing, time perception, temporal regulation, and temporal discrimination are alternative labels to designate approximately the same research domain.
“These drawbacks center on very practical concerns for psychology as an experimental and theoretical enterprise” (p. 11; emphasis added).
Their rationale is similar to behavioral-analytic research by Dews (1970) who turned on and off the keylight to study whether pigeons’ temporal performance in a FI schedule was chain-like, in which case it should be disrupted by the stimulus interruptions.
The argument seems to imply that theoretical entities and therefore theories are dispensable; hence the theoretician’s dilemma.
Cognitive researcher Johnson-Laird (1988) gave two answers to the theoretician's dilemma, both intended as a criticism of the behavioral approach: (1) Much of human behavior is spontaneous in the sense that it does not depend on external causes, and (2) granted that mental states exist, we should study them even if they are not necessary to formulate the laws of behavior. Point (1) is questionable because spontaneity does not imply lack of sensitivity to context; point (2), however, is well taken, but by the same token we can conclude that, if mental states have a historical origins then we should study them, even though that origin may not be necessary to formulate the laws of cognition.
To avoid mediational models, behaviorists could take the scalar property as a theoretical primitive and relegate to neuroscience the explication of its physiological basis. They could also elaborate the notion of generic stimulus and response class to encompass statistical classes, and then assume that stimulus duration would form statistical classes obeying Weber’s law. As Zuriff (1985) noted, mediation would be avoided by functionally (re)defined stimulus and response classes, the invariants of the learning episode (Machado, 1992, 1993).
In his 1615 essay "Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina," Galileo tries to reconcile the Copernican system with the doctrines of the Church. One of his famous remarks concerned scriptural interpretation: “Hence I should think it would be the part of prudence not to permit anyone to usurp scriptural texts and force them in some way to maintain any physical conclusion to be true [or false], when at some future time the senses and demonstrative or necessary reasons may show the contrary” (Galileo Galilei, 1957/1615, p. 187). Likewise, behavioral analysts should not reject or deny hypothetical constructs that might, upon further research, prove useful and true.
Allan, L. G. (1998). The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research. Behavioural Processes, 44, 101–117.
Allman, M. J., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: First- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 743–771.
Bachelard, G. (1968). The philosophy of No: A philosophy of the new scientific mind. [Trans. G. C. Waterston. New York: The Orion Press. (Originally published in 1940.)
Bachelard, G. (1984). The new scientific spirit. (A. Goldhammer, trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1934)
Bunge, M. (1967). Analogy in quantum theory: From insight to nonsense. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, 265–286.
Carvalho, M., Machado, A., & Vasconcelos, M. (2016). Animal timing: A synthetic approach. Animal Cognition, 19, 707–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0977-2.
Carvalho, M., Machado, A., & Tonneau, F. (2015). Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning. Cognition, 42, 67–81.
Catania, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and the psychophysical judgments: a study of some temporal properties of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 1–42) Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Church, R. M. (2003). A concise introduction to scalar timing theory. In W. Meck (Ed.), Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing (pp. 3–22). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Church, R. M. (2004). Temporal learning. In H. Pashler & C. R. Gallistel (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, Vol. 3: Learning, motivation, and emotion (3rd ed.; pp. 365–393). New York: Wiley.
Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.9.2.160.
Dews, P. B. (1970). The theory of fixed-interval responding. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 43–61) Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Duhem, P. (1996). To save the phenomena: Essay on the concept of physical therapy from Plato to Galileo. In R. Ariew & P. Barker (Eds. and Trans.). Essays in the history and philosophy of science (pp. 131–156). Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis. (Original work published 1908)
Eckard, M. L., & Lattal, K. A. (2020). The internal clock: A manifestation of a misguided mechanistic view of causation? Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5.
Farber, E. (1950). Chemical discoveries by means of analogies. Isis, 41(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/226383.
Fetterman, J. G., & Killeen, P. R. (1995). Categorical scaling of time: implications for clock-counter models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 43–63.
Galileo Galilei. (1957). Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo (pp. 173–216). New York: Anchor Books. Originally published in 1615.
Gibbon, J., & Church, R. (1992). Comparison of variance and covariance patterns in parallel and serial theories of timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 393–406.
Gibbon, J., Malapani, C., Dale, C. L., & Gallistel, C. R. (1997). Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: Advances and challenges. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 170–184.
Harris, D. F. (1912). The metaphor in science. Science, 36(922), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.36.922.263.
Hass, J., & Durstewitz, D. (2016). Time at the center, or time at the side? Assessing current models of time perception. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.030.
Hempel, C. G. (1958). The theoretician’s dilemma. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp. 37–98). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Hineline, P. (1984). Editorial. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 1–2.
Hineline, P. (1990). The origins of environment-based psychological theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 305–320.
Holton, G. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jammer, M. (1957). Concepts of force. New York, NY: Dover.
Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). The computer and the mind. Harvard University Press.
Killeen, P., & Fetterman, G. (1993). The behavioral theory of timing: transition analyses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 411–422.
Killeen, P. R., Hall, S., & Bizo, L. A. (1999). A clock not wound runs down. Behavioural Processes, 45, 129–139.
Leak, T. M., & Gibbon, J. (1995). Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: Implications of the scalar property. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 3–19.
Leary, D. E. (Ed.). (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leatherdale, W. H. (1974). The role of analogy, model and metaphor in science. New York: Elsevier.
Machado, A. (1992). The future of behaviorism: An insider's perspective. In Paper presented at the 25th International Congress of Psychology. Brussels: Belgium.
Machado, A. (1993). Internal states: Necessary but not sufficient. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 469–472.
Machado, A., & Guilhardi, P. (2000). Shifts in the psychometric function and their implications for models of timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 25–54.
Machado, A., & Keen, R. (1999). Learning to Time (LET) or Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET)? A Critical Test of Two Models of Timing. Psychological Science, 10, 285–290.
Machado, A., Lourenço, O., & Silva, F. (2000). Facts, concepts, and theories: The shape of psychology’s epistemic triangle. Behavior & Philosophy, 28, 1–40.
Machado, A., Malheiro, M. T., & Erlhagen, W. (2009). Learning to time: A perspective. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 423–458.
Machado, A., & Silva, F. (2007a). Toward a richer view of the scientific method: The role of conceptual analysis. American Psychologist, 62, 671–681.
Machado, A., & Silva, F. (2007b). On the clarification of concepts: A reply to Gallistel and Lau. American Psychologist, 62, 689–691.
Meck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 227–242.
Myung, I. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1283.
Roberts, S., & Church, R. M. (1978). Control of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.4.4.318.
Schneider, B. A. (1969). A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677.
Stubbs, D. A. (1968). The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Armando Machado is a member of the William James Center for Research supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology. Armando Machado and Marcelo S. Caetano are members of the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino, supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq, Grant # 465686/2014-1), the Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES, Grant # 88887.136407/2017-00), and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Grant # 2014/50909-8). PG would like to thank Dr. Robert F. Littleton for his ongoing support.
Conflict of Interest
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest relevant to the research.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The research reported here used no human or animal participants.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The acknowledgement section was updated in the original article to include the sentence “PG would like to thank Dr. Robert F. Littleton for his ongoing support”.The acknowledgement section was updated in the original article to include the sentence “PG would like to thank Dr. Robert F. Littleton for his ongoing support”.
About this article
Cite this article
Machado, A., Guilhardi, P., Caetano, M.S. et al. Rules of Conduct for Behavior Analysts in the Presence of Hypothetical Constructs: A Commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020). Perspect Behav Sci 43, 791–802 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w
- Behavior analysis
- Hypothetical constructs
- Internal clock models
- Mediational theories
- Temporal control