The Potential Benefits of Flexibility for Dissemination and Implementation: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as an Example

  • Michael E. LevinEmail author
  • Brooke M. Smith
  • Gregory S. Smith

The article by Fixsen and Blase (this issue) provides a clear roadmap for how to scale up behavior analytic procedures for successful dissemination and implementation. The authors outline the steps taken and lessons learned in achieving large-scale implementation through strategies such as focusing on fidelity, replication, and larger units of analysis with a well-defined set of procedures and programs. Identifying factors that affect successful dissemination and implementation is critically important to ensure decades of careful research have maximum impact on providers, policies, and, ultimately, public health. Yet, there may be multiple pathways to success and exploring other strategies can broaden the range of methods from which to choose.

In this commentary, we will highlight some of the converging and diverging strategies between the Teaching-Family Model (TFM) and the dissemination and implementation of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). ACT is a behavior analytic approach...



  1. American Psychological Association (APA) (2016). Psychological treatments. Division 12. Retrieved from
  2. Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS) (2018). ACT randomized controlled trials since 1986. Retrieved from
  3. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darrow, S. M., & Follette, W. C. (2014). Where’s the beef? Reply to Kanter, Holman, and Wilson. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3, 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dindo, L., Marchman, J., Gindes, H., & Fiedorowicz, J. G. (2015). A brief behavioral intervention targeting mental health risk factors for vascular disease: A pilot study. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 84, 183–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon, M. R., & Paliliunas, D. (2018). AIM: A behavior analytic curriculum for social-emotional development in children. Shawnee Scientific Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Bissett, R., Piasecki, M., Batten, S. V., et al. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of twelve-step facilitation and acceptance and commitment therapy with polysubstance abusing methadone maintained opiate addicts. Behavior Therapy, 35, 667–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooper, N., & Larsson, A. (2015). The research journey of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanter, J. W., Holman, G., & Wilson, K. G. (2014). Where is the love? Contextual behavioral science and behavior analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levin, M. E., Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Seeley, J. (2016). Web-based self-help for preventing mental health problems in universities: Comparing acceptance and commitment training to mental health education. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55(2), 95–107.Google Scholar
  14. Plumb, J. C., & Vilardaga, R. (2010). Assessing treatment integrity in acceptance and commitment therapy: Strategies and suggestions. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation & Therapy, 6, 263–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Polk, K. L., & Schoendorff, B. (2014). The act matrix: A new approach to building psychological flexibility across settings and populations. Context Press.Google Scholar
  16. Robinson, P. J., Gould, D. A., & Strosahl, K. D. (2011). Real behavior change in primary care: Improving patient outcomes and increasing job satisfaction. New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  17. Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2008). Mindfulness- and acceptance-based behavioral therapies in practice. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Shull, R. L. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Discussant’s remarks. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in Psychology. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2010). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Retrieved from
  21. Stewart, C., Ebert, B., & Bockarie, H. (2017). Commit and act in Sierra Leone. In R. G. White, S. Jain, D. M. R. Orr, & U. M. Read (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sociocultural perspectives on global mental health (pp. 657–678). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Törneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its clinical application. Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
  23. Vilardaga, R., Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., & Muto, T. (2009). Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach. The Behavior Analyst, 32(1), 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Villatte, M., Villatte, J. L., & Hayes, S.C. (2015). Mastering the clinical conversation: Language as intervention. Guilford Press. New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Walser, R. D., Karlin, B. E., Trockel, M., Mazina, B., & Taylor, C. B. (2013). Training in and implementation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for depression in the Veterans Health Administration: Therapist and patient outcomes. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 51, 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zettle, R. D. (2005). The evolution of a contextual approach to therapy: From comprehensive distancing to ACT. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation & Therapy, 1(2), 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.ChrysalisProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations