Advertisement

Translating Behavior Analysis: a Spectrum Rather than a Road Map

  • Elizabeth G. E. Kyonka
  • Shrinidhi Subramaniam
Article

Abstract

Much has been written about the potential benefits of translational research in behavior analysis, but a lack of consensus about what constitutes “translational” creates a barrier to effective knowledge–practice innovation within the discipline and across other sciences. We propose a tiered system, adapted from a biomedical translational pathway, for classifying behavior analysis research on a basic–applied spectrum. Tier 0 is blue sky basic science in which the subjects, behaviors, stimuli, and settings are selected for convenience. Tier 1 is use-inspired basic science with a socially important end game and research subject. Tier 2 is solution-oriented research that attempts to solve a specific problem in a socially important subject, but 1 or more aspects of the research are selected for purposes of experimental control rather than social importance. Tier 3 is applied behavior analysis research that studies a problem of social significance for the subject and involves behaviors, stimuli, and settings that are socially important. Tier 4 is impact assessment in which behavioral technology is applied with a direct benefit to society. We provide examples of behavior–analytic research in each tier and evaluate the potential benefits of organizing behavior analysis in this way.

Keywords

Translational research pathway Basic–applied continuum Biomedical model Internal validity Social significance Experimental analysis of behavior Applied behavior analysis Scientific consequences Taxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Michael Perone, Regina Carroll, and Editor Tom Critchfield for their invaluable input. Portions of this article were presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis Australia Inaugural Conference in 2016.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this work and are listed alphabetically.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The authors have no relevant funding to declare.

References

  1. Adams, J. U. (2008). Building the bridge from bench to bedside. Nature Reviews, 7, 463–464.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldi, C., Crigler, A., Kates-McElrath, K., Long, B., Smith, H., Rehak, K., & Wilkinson, L. (2016). Examining the effects of video modeling and prompts to teach activities of daily living skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 384–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0127-y.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade, L. F., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2017). Substitution effects in a generalized token economy with pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 123–135  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azrin, N. H. (1977). A strategy for applied research: Learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 32, 140–149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.2.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1987.20-313.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991). The experimental analysis of human behavior: Indispensable, ancillary, or irrelevant? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 145–155.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becirevic, A., Reed, D. D., & Amlung, M. (2017). An initial investigation of the effects of tanning-related cues on demand and craving for indoor tanning. The Psychological Record, 67, 149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0246-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergmann, S. C., Kodak, T. M., & LeBlanc, B. A. (2017). Effects of programmed errors of omission and commission during auditory-visual conditional discrimination training with typically developing children. The Psychological Record, 67, 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0211-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumberg, R. S., Dittel, B., Hafler, D., Von Herrath, M., & Nestle, F. O. (2012). Unraveling the autoimmune translational research process layer by layer. Nature Medicine, 18, 35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boomhower, S. R., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2014). Haloperidol and rimonabant increase delay discounting in rats fed high-fat and standard-chow diets. Behavioural Pharmacology, 25, 705–716.  https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000058.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borrero, C. S., England, J. D., Sarcia, B., & Woods, J. N. (2016). A comparison of descriptive and functional analyses of inappropriate mealtime behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 364–379.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0149-5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boynton, B. R., & Elster, E. (2012). Translational research: A historical overview and contemporary reflections on the transformative nature of research. Journal of Research Administration, 43, 15–28.Google Scholar
  15. Bush, V. (1945). Science: the endless frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, D. (2008). Translational research: Crossing the valley of death. Nature, 453, 840–842.  https://doi.org/10.1038/453840a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cambrioso, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S., Lewison, G., & Mogoutov, A. (2006). Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. European Journal of Cancer, 42, 3140–3148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cariveau, T., & Kodak, T. (2017). Programming a randomized dependent group contingency and common stimuli to promote durable behavior change. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carroll, R. A., & St. Peter, C. C. (2017). Proportion of available points predicts student attendance in college courses. The Psychological Record, 67, 61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0207-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Casal-Plana, N., Manteca, X., Dalmau, A., & Fàbrega, E. (2017). Influence of enrichment material and herbal compounds in the behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheeran, B., Cohen, L., Dobkin, B., Ford, G., Greenwood, R., Howard, D., . . .Wolf, S. (2009). The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: Driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308326636.
  22. Cohrs, C. M., Shriver, M. D., Burke, R. V., & Allen, K. D. (2016). Evaluation of increasing antecedent specificity in goal statements on adherence to positive behavior-management strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 768–779.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Collins, F. S., Wilder, E. L., & Zerhouni, E. (2014). NIH roadmap/common fund at 10 years. Science, 345(6194), 274–276.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255860.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Cox, A. D., Virues-Ortega, J., Julio, F., & Martin, T. L. (2017). Establishing motion control in children with autism and intellectual disability: Applications for anatomical and functional MRI. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 8–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Critchfield, T. S. (2011). To a young basic scientist, about to embark on a program of translational research. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 137–148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392245.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Critchfield, T. S., & Howard, N. L. (2016). Modeling the detection of early-evolving melanoma symptoms: Role of cancer information and delay discounting. The Psychological Record, 66, 503–514.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0190-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2004). Conduits of translation in behavior-science bridge research. In J. E. Burgos & E. Ribes (Eds.), Theory, basic and applied research, and technological applications in behavior science: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 45–84). Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara Press.Google Scholar
  29. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2009). What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models? The Behavior Analyst, 32, 339–362.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2016). Does hearing about cancer influence stimulus control? An exploratory study of verbal modulation of stimulus generalization. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 46–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0055-5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2017). The fuzzy concept of applied behavior analysis research. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 123–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0093-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Denton, T. F., & Meindl, J. N. (2016). The effect of colored overlays on reading fluency in individuals with dyslexia. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0079-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diller, J. W., Barry, R. J., & Gelino, B. W. (2016). Visual analysis of data in a multielement design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 980–985.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., Kime, D., & Daar, J. H. (2017). Establishing derived categorical responding in children with disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 134–145.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dixon, M. R., Buono, F. D., & Belisle, J. (2016). Contrived motivating operations alter delay-discounting values of disordered gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 986–990.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Embry, D. D. (2002). The good behavior game: a best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020977107086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ewry, D. M., & Fryling, M. J. (2016). Evaluating the high-probability instructional sequence to increase the acceptance of foods with an adolescent with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 380–383.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0098-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fernandez-Moure, J. S. (2016). Lost in translation: The gap in scientific advancements and clinical application. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 4.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00043.
  39. Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. (2016). Application of functional analysis methods to assess human–dog interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 970–974.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Finkbeiner, S. (2010). Bridging the valley of death of therapeutics for neurodegeneration. Nature Medicine, 16, 1227–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fleishman, E. A. (1975). Toward a taxonomy of human performance. American Psychologist, 30, 1127–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fox, A. E., & Kyonka, E. G. (2016). Effects of signaling on temporal control of behavior in response-initiated fixed intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106, 210–224.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Freedman, D. H. (2016). Improving public perception of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 39, 89–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-015-0045-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Glodowski, K., & Thompson, R. (2017). Do distracting activities increase tolerance for an infant cry? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 159–164.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goldblatt, E. M., & Lee, W. (2010). From bench to bedside: The growing use of translational research in cancer medicine. American Journal of Translational Research, 2, 1–18.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Hake, D. F. (1982). The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 21–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henley, A. J., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Reed, D. D., & Kaplan, B. A. (2016). A crowdsourced nickel-and-dime approach to analog OBM research: A behavioral economic framework for understanding workforce attrition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106, 134–144.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Higgins, S. T., Reed, D. D., Redner, R., Skelly, J. M., Zvorsky, I. A., & Kurti, A. N. (2017). Simulating demand for cigarettes among pregnant women: A low-risk method for studying vulnerable populations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 176–190.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holtyn, A. F., Jarvis, B. P., & Silverman, K. (2017). Behavior analysts in the war on poverty: A review of the use of financial incentives to promote education and employment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 9–20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.233.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hörig, H., Marincola, E., & Marincola, F. M. (2005). Obstacles and opportunities in translational research. Nature Medicine, 11, 705–708.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0705-705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smyth, S. (2017). Implicit cross-community biases revisited: Evidence for ingroup favoritism in the absence of outgroup derogation in Northern Ireland. The Psychological Record, 67, 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0210-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jimenez, S., & Pietras, C. (2017). A risk-reduction model of sharing: Role of social stimuli and inequity. The Psychological Record, 67, 11–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0202-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kellam, S. G., Wang, W., Mackenzie, A. C., Brown, C. H., Ompad, D. C., Or, F., … Windham, A. (2014). The impact of the good behavior game, a universal classroom-based preventive intervention in first and second grades, on high-risk sexual behaviors and drug abuse and dependence disorders into young adulthood. Prevention Science, 15, 6–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0296-z.
  56. Krentz, H., Miltenberger, R., & Valbuena, D. (2016). Using token reinforcement to increase walking for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 745–750.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lattal, K. A., & Laipple, J. S. (2003). Pragmatism and behavior analysis. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 41–61). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ledbetter-Cho, K., Lang, R., Davenport, K., Moore, M., Lee, A., O’Reilly, M., Watkins, L., & Falcomata, T. (2016). Behavioral skills training to improve the abduction-prevention skills of children with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 266–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0128-x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lerman, D. C. (2003). From the laboratory to community application: Translational research in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 415–419.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-415.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-293.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Macpherson, K., & Roberts, W. A. (2013). Can dogs count? Learning and Motivation, 44, 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2013.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madden, G. J. (2012). Lessons from JEAB to JEAB. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-1.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Magoon, M. A., Critchfield, T. S., Merrill, D., Newland, M. C., & Schneider, W. J. (2017). Are positive and negative reinforcement “different”? Insights from a free-operant differential outcomes effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 39–64.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mahoney, A., Lalonde, K., Edwards, T., Cox, C., Weetjens, B., & Poling, A. (2014). Landmine-detection rats: An evaluation of reinforcement procedures under simulated operational conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 450–456.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marr, M. J. (2017). The future of behavior analysis: Foxes and hedgehogs revisited. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 197–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0107-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mazur, J. E. (2010). Translational research in JEAB. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 291–292.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-291.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Egger, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). A pilot study of the relations within which hearing voices participates: Towards a functional distinction between voice hearers and controls. The Psychological Record, 66, 611–626.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0196-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McIlvane, W. J. (2009). Translational behavior analysis: From laboratory science in stimulus control to intervention with persons with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 273–280.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Metz, E. R., Kohn, C. S., Schultz, N. R., & Bettencourt, K. (2017). Evaluation of pour training procedures for college students. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 17, 18–32.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mold, J. W., & Peterson, K. A. (2005). Primary care practice-based research networks: Working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 512–520.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mullane, M. P., Martens, B. K., Baxter, E. L., & Steeg, D. V. (2017). Children’s preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement: A translational study of risky choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O’Neill, J., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2016). Selection-based instruction with touch-screen video and the emergence of exact, recombinative, and novel topography-based responses to interview questions. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 194–204.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0068-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Odum, A. L. (2015). Editorial. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104, 205–208  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ogilvie, D., Craig, P., Griffin, S., Macintyre, S., & Wareham, N. J. (2009). A translational framework for public health research. Biomedical Public Health, 9, 116–125.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pennington, B., & McComas, J. J. (2017). Effects of the good behavior game across classroom contexts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 176–180.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pereira-Figueiredo, I., Costa, H., Carro, J., Stilwell, G., & Rosa, I. (2017). Behavioural changes induced by handling at different timeframes in Lusitano yearling horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 196, 36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Peters-Scheffer, N., Didden, R., Korzilius, H., & Matson, J. (2012). Cost comparison of early intensive behavioral intervention and treatment as usual for children with autism spectrum disorder in the Netherlands. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1763–1772.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Poling, A. (2010). Looking to the future: Will behavior analysis survive and prosper? The Behavior Analyst, 33, 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Poling, A., Valverde, E., Beyene, N., Mulder, C., Cox, C., Mgode, G., & Edwards, T. L. (2017). Active tuberculosis detection by pouched rats in 2014: More than 2,000 new patients found in two countries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 165–169.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Poling, A., Weetjens, B., Cox, C., Beyene, N., Durgin, A., & Mahoney, A. (2011). Tuberculosis detection by giant African pouched rats. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392234.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Raiff, B. R., Arena, A., Meredith, S. E., & Grabinksi, M. J. (2017). Feasibility of a mobile group financial-incentives intervention among pairs of smokers with a prior social relationship. The Psychological Record, 67, 231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0238-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Raiff, B. R., Jarvis, B. P., & Dallery, J. (2016). Text-message reminders plus incentives increase adherence to antidiabetic medication in adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 947–953.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Reichow, B., Barton, E. E., Boyd, B. A., & Hume, K. (2012). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012(10), 1–61.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009260.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2017). Comparison of arousal and preference assessment outcomes for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rider, D. P. (1991). The speciation of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392567.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robertson, S. H., Boomhower, S. R., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2017). High-fat diet alters weight, caloric intake, and haloperidol sensitivity in the context of effort-based responding. Behavioural Pharmacology, 28, 323–333.  https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Russell, F., & Burke, D. (2016). Conditional same/different concept learning in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 133–154.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sargisson, R. J., Lockhart, R. A., McEwan, J. S., & Bizo, L. A. (2016). Demonstration of the scalar property of timing with possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 81–86.  https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shillingsburg, M. A., Gayman, C. M., & Walton, W. (2016). Using textual prompts to teach mands for information using “who?”. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0053-7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  92. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  93. Spieler, C., & Miltenberger, R. (2017). Using awareness training to decrease nervous habits during public speaking. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stitzer, M., Matheson, T., Cunningham, C., Sorensen, J. L., Feaster, D. J., Gooden, L., … Metsch, L. R. (2017). Enhancing patient navigation to improve intervention session attendance and viral load suppression of persons with HIV and substance use: A secondary post hoc analysis of the Project HOPE study. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 12, 16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-017-0081-1.
  95. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  96. Subramaniam, S., Everly, J. J., & Silverman, K. (2017). Reinforcing productivity in a job-skills training program for unemployed substance-abusing adults. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 17, 114–128.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr, Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., … Larson, E. L. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 1278–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.
  98. Taubes, G. (2013). The science of obesity: What do we really know about what makes us fat? An essay by Gary Taubes. British Medical Journal, 346(7904), 16–19.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L., & Green, L. (2016). Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human—does it matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 141–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Varelas, A., & Fields, L. (2017). Equivalence based instruction by group based clicker training and sorting tests. The Psychological Record, 67, 71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0208-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Westfall, J. M., Mold, J., & Fagan, L. (2007). Practice-based research: “Blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297, 403–406.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wheeler, T. A. (2015, March 19). Taxonomy matters. Here’s why [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://lymanmuseum.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/taxonomy-matters-heres-why/.
  103. Witts, B. N., Arief, I., & Hutter, E. (2016). Using a verbal analysis of Lady Gaga’s Applause as a classroom exercise for teaching verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 78–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0050-x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Woodcock, J., & Woosley, R. (2008). The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Annual Review of Medicine, 59, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.59.090506.155819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 211–213.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2007.26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wright, A. A., Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Leonard, K., & Kelly, D. M. (2016). Concept learning set-size functions for Clark’s nutcrackers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 76–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zerhouni, E. (2003). The NIH roadmap. Science, 302(5642), 63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zimmermann, Z. J., Watkins, E. E., & Poling, A. (2015). JEAB research over time: Species used, experimental designs, statistical analyses, and sex of subjects. The Behavior Analyst, 38, 203–218.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zucker, D. R. (2009). What is needed to promote translational research and how do we get it? Journal of Investigative Medicine, 57, 468–470.  https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e31819824d8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth G. E. Kyonka
    • 1
  • Shrinidhi Subramaniam
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Psychology and Behavioural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations