Advertisement

The Behavior Analyst

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 193–196 | Cite as

Beyond Basic or Applied

  • Claire C. St. Peter
Commentary
  • 540 Downloads

Applying a categorical label to something forces discriminations about that thing. This object is a chair (and that object is not). This writing utensil is a pencil (and that writing utensil is not). This research is applied behavior analysis (and that research is not). If we have labels, we must have some boundary condition of what constitutes exemplars and non-exemplars of that label. The boundary conditions for applied behavior analysis established by Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968) occurred at a time that traditional operant procedures were receiving considerable negative public press (see Critchfield & Reed, 2017, and Rutherford, 2009for detailed discussions). Applying a new label to research that emphasized social validity may have been historically important to establish applied behavior analysis as something “other” than the experimental analysis of behavior (either human or nonhuman). This distinction may have allowed a generation (or more) of behavior modifiers and applied...

Keywords

Behavior Analysis Applied Behavior Analysis Behavior Analyst Applied Behavior Informative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Karen Anderson, Katherine Kestner, Henry Pennypacker, and the doctoral students working with me at West Virginia University for their insights about issues mentioned in this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Critchfield, T. S. (2015). PBIS may not qualify as classical applied behavior analysis. So what? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 99–100. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0048-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2017). The fuzzy concept of applied behavior analysis research. The Behavior Analyst.Google Scholar
  4. Elliott, A. J., Morgan, K., Fuqua, R. W., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling, A. (2005). Self- and cross-citations in the journal of applied behavior analysis and the journal of the experimental analysis of behavior: 1993-2003. J Appl Behav Anal, 38, 559–563. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.133-04.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray, J. M., & Diller, J. W. (2017). Evaluating the work of applied animal behaviorists as applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 17, 33–41. doi: 10.1037/bar0000041.Google Scholar
  6. Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: an example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 131–144. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Taubman, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Ross, R. K., & Weiss, M. J. (2016). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 720–731. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2591-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Martens, B. K., Daly, E. I., & Ardoin, S. P. (2015). Applications of applied behavior analysis to school-based instructional intervention. In H. S. Roane, J. E. Ringdahl, T. S. Falcomata, H. S. Roane, J. E. Ringdahl, & T. S. Falcomata (Eds.), Clinical and organizational applications of applied behavior analysis (pp. 125–150). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420249-8.00006-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rutherford, A. (2009). Beyond the box: B. F. Skinner’s technology of behavior from laboratory to life, 1950s–1970s. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Skinner, B. F. (2004). Psychology in the year 2000. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 207–213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Vyse, S. (2013). Changing course. The Behavior Analyst, 36, 123–135.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations