Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires

Abstract

Delay discounting describes the process wherein rewards lose value as a function of their delayed receipt; how quickly rewards lose value is termed the rate of delay discounting. Rates of delay discounting are robust predictors of much behavior of societal importance. One efficient approach to obtaining a human subject’s rate of delay discounting is via the 21- and 27-item Monetary Choice Questionnaires, brief dichotomous choice tasks that assess preference between small immediate and larger delayed monetary outcomes. Unfortunately, the scoring procedures for the Monetary Choice Questionnaires are rather complex, which may serve as a barrier to their use. This report details a freely available Excel-based spreadsheet tool that automatically scores Monetary Choice Questionnaire response sets, using both traditional and contemporary/advanced approaches. An overview of the Monetary Choice Questionnaire and its scoring algorithm is provided. We conclude with general considerations for using the spreadsheet tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    Accordingly, this report is written for researchers familiar with delay discounting assessments. An introduction to delay discounting and its various assessments is beyond the scope of this report. Readers from other domains interested in learning more about delay discounting are encouraged to consult Madden & Bickel, 2010.

  2. 2.

    Accordingly, KU ScholarWorks provides static URLs; thus, the URL provided in this report will indefinitely serve as the source page for the tool.

  3. 3.

    By “true,” we mean an indifference point we would expect to obtain using a fine-grained titration procedure.

  4. 4.

    We know of no empirical work comparing inferences made from the geomean and overall k values; because different discounting researchers prefer one over the other, we offer both approaches to aggregate summaries of k to accommodate researchers’ personal preferences.

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amlung, M., & MacKillop, J. (2014). Clarifying the relationship between impulsive delay discounting and nicotine dependence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 761–768. doi:10.1037/a0036726.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Amlung, M., Petker, T., Jackson, J., Balodis, I., & MacKillop, J. (2016). Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta analysis. Psychological Medicine. doi:10.1017/S0033291716000866.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012). Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 134(3), 287–297. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bickel, W. K., Koffarnus, M. N., Moody, L., & Wilson, A. G. (2014). The behavioral- and neuro-economic process of temporal discounting: a candidate behavioral marker of addiction. Neuropharmacology, 76(Pt B), 518–527. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Critchfield, T. S., & Kollins, S. H. (2001). Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(1), 101–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2009). What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models? The Behavior Analyst, 32(2), 339–362.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiology and Behavior, 100(5), 438–445. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.04.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferraro, F. R., & Weatherly, J. N. (2016). Texting dependence, ipod dependence, and delay discounting. The American Journal of Psychology, 129(2), 161–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Franck, C. T., Koffarnus, M. N., House, L. L., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). Accurate characterization of delay discounting: a multiple model approach using approximate Bayesian model selection and a unified discounting measure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 218–233. doi:10.1002/jeab.128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Landes, R. D., Christensen, D. R., Jones, B. A., Jackson, L., Yi, R., et al. (2014). Discounting of money and sex: effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant-dependent men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 39(11), 1652–1657. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Lemley, S. M., Asmussen, L., & Reed, D. D. (2015). Mr. right versus Mr. right now: a discounting-based approach to promiscuity. Behavioural Processes, 115, 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 129–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, M. W., Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Sweeney, M. M. (2015). Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS One, 10(5), e0128641. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan, B. A., Lemley, S. M., Reed, D. D., & Jarmolowicz, D. P. (2014a). 21- and 27-item monetary choice questionnaire automated scorers [software]. Lawrence, KS: Center for Applied Neuroeconomics, University of Kansas. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1808/15424. Accessed 20 July 2016.

  18. Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., & McKerchar, T. L. (2014b). Using a visual analogue scale to assess delay, social, and probability discounting of an environmental loss. Psychological Record, 64(2), 261–269. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0041-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Killeen, P. R. (2009). An additive-utility model of delay discounting. Psychological Review, 116(3), 602–619. doi:10.1037/a0016414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Killeen, P. R. (2015). The arithmetic of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 249–259. doi:10.1002/jeab.130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirby, K. (2000). Instructions for inferring discount rates from choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Unpublished manuscript, Williams College.

  22. Kirby, K. N. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 457–462. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 704–713. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.019.

  24. Kirby, K. N., & Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 100–104. doi:10.3758/BF03210748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirby, K. N., & Petry, N. M. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non‐drug‐using controls. Addiction, 99(4), 461–471. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00669.x.

  26. Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78–87. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioural Processes, 69(2), 173–187. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.003.

  28. Landes, R. D., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Analytical methods to detect within-individual changes in discounting. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18(2), 175–183. doi:10.1037/A0018901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafo, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 216(3), 305–321. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2229-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. MacKillop, J., Amlung, M., Pryor, L., Ray, L. A., & Munafo, M. (2010). Understanding impulsivity and alcohol misuse via delayed reward discounting. Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(8), 18a.

    Google Scholar 

  31. MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Wier, L. M., David, S. P., Ray, L. A., Bickel, W. K., et al. (2012). The neuroeconomics of nicotine dependence: a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delay discounting of monetary and cigarette rewards in smokers. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 202(1), 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: the behavioral and neurological science of discounting (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2), 139–145. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.2.139.

  34. Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A. M., Mueller, A. M., Hehli, D. J., & Wegener, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12(4), 251–261. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.251.

  35. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell, S. H., Wilson, V. B., & Karalunas, S. L. (2015). Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting. Behavioural Processes, 114, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Myerson, J., Baumann, A. A., & Green, L. (2014). Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire. Behavioural Processes, 107, 99–105. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Odum, A. L. (2011). Delay discounting: i’m a k, you’re a k. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 427–439. doi:10.1901/jeab.2011.96-423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rachlin, H. (2006). Notes on discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(3), 425–435. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.85-05.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rasmussen, E. B., Lawyer, S. R., & Reilly, W. (2010). Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes, 83(1), 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.09.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reed, D. D., Becirevic, A., Atchley, P., Kaplan, B. A., & Liese, B. S. (2016). Validation of a novel delay discounting of text messaging questionnaire. The Psychological Record. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0167-2.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yoon, J. H., & Higgins, S. T. (2008). Turning k on its head: comments on use of an ED50 in delay discounting research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(1), 169–172. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek D. Reed.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was not funded.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Readers are encouraged to download the MCQ scoring tool via https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/15424.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaplan, B.A., Amlung, M., Reed, D.D. et al. Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires. BEHAV ANALYST 39, 293–304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delay discounting
  • Impulsivity
  • Microsoft Excel
  • Monetary Choice Questionnaire
  • Software
  • Technology