Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires
- 885 Downloads
Delay discounting describes the process wherein rewards lose value as a function of their delayed receipt; how quickly rewards lose value is termed the rate of delay discounting. Rates of delay discounting are robust predictors of much behavior of societal importance. One efficient approach to obtaining a human subject’s rate of delay discounting is via the 21- and 27-item Monetary Choice Questionnaires, brief dichotomous choice tasks that assess preference between small immediate and larger delayed monetary outcomes. Unfortunately, the scoring procedures for the Monetary Choice Questionnaires are rather complex, which may serve as a barrier to their use. This report details a freely available Excel-based spreadsheet tool that automatically scores Monetary Choice Questionnaire response sets, using both traditional and contemporary/advanced approaches. An overview of the Monetary Choice Questionnaire and its scoring algorithm is provided. We conclude with general considerations for using the spreadsheet tool.
KeywordsDelay discounting Impulsivity Microsoft Excel Monetary Choice Questionnaire Software Technology
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This work was not funded.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012). Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence. Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 134(3), 287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Franck, C. T., Koffarnus, M. N., House, L. L., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). Accurate characterization of delay discounting: a multiple model approach using approximate Bayesian model selection and a unified discounting measure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 218–233. doi: 10.1002/jeab.128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jarmolowicz, D. P., Landes, R. D., Christensen, D. R., Jones, B. A., Jackson, L., Yi, R., et al. (2014). Discounting of money and sex: effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant-dependent men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 39(11), 1652–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, M. W., Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Sweeney, M. M. (2015). Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS One, 10(5), e0128641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan, B. A., Lemley, S. M., Reed, D. D., & Jarmolowicz, D. P. (2014a). 21- and 27-item monetary choice questionnaire automated scorers [software]. Lawrence, KS: Center for Applied Neuroeconomics, University of Kansas. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1808/15424. Accessed 20 July 2016.
- Kirby, K. (2000). Instructions for inferring discount rates from choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Unpublished manuscript, Williams College.Google Scholar
- Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(6), 704–713. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.019.
- Kirby, K. N., & Petry, N. M. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non‐drug‐using controls. Addiction, 99(4), 461–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00669.x.
- Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioural Processes, 69(2), 173–187. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.003.
- MacKillop, J., Amlung, M., Pryor, L., Ray, L. A., & Munafo, M. (2010). Understanding impulsivity and alcohol misuse via delayed reward discounting. Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(8), 18a.Google Scholar
- MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Wier, L. M., David, S. P., Ray, L. A., Bickel, W. K., et al. (2012). The neuroeconomics of nicotine dependence: a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delay discounting of monetary and cigarette rewards in smokers. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 202(1), 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.10.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., & Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2), 139–145. doi: 10.1037/1064-1222.214.171.124.
- Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A. M., Mueller, A. M., Hehli, D. J., & Wegener, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12(4), 251–261. doi: 10.1037/1064-12126.96.36.199.
- Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar