Abstract
Narratives that describe models of how the world works involve some form of idealization, but all models are subjective and influenced by many human factors including the location, period of time, and profession of the narrator. Charles Darwin is a particularly fascinating case. Many scientists have tended—and continue—to idealize him as a person and a scientist, as well as his evolutionary ideas, in particular those related to “adaptationism” and the “struggle for existence.” In fact, many still defend that there is no need for any kind of new or even “extended” evolutionary theories: what we have from Darwin, or from the subsequent “Modern Synthesis,” is enough, as if the thousands of studies made in the last decades, including the discovery of the DNA, the genomes of humans and other species, or the crucial evolutionary role played by epigenetics, did not add anything relevant to how we understand biological evolution. Interestingly, such reactions are somehow comparable with those of some religious leaders that, when certain scientific discoveries contradict narratives of a religious text, argue that these are just “minor” details that do not put those narratives into question. An example concerns certain adaptationist narratives, which as Gould noted cannot be falsified: by assuming a priori that a structure has to have an “adaptive function,” even when hypotheses that the function is A, B, C, or D are contradicted, one tries to show that perhaps the function is E, or F, and so on, instead of being at least open to the hypothesis that perhaps those “negative results” mean that the structure has no current “adaptive function.” Such circular reasoning is deeply related to another common feature of humans-the-storytelling-animals: our continuous search for “purpose.” As the founder of biology, Aristotle, famously stated, nature “does nothing in vain”—a teleological notion that deeply influenced Darwin, and continues to influence us. The aim of this paper is not to criticize Darwin—I profoundly admire his life, travels, persistence, naturalism, and brilliant ideas such as that of natural selection. Instead, here, I discuss subjects such as adaptationism and the notions of progress, purpose, and “struggle for life” and their links to racism and misogyny to call attention to the remarkable parallel between religious thinking and the inflexible way in which many defend Darwin’s, Darwinist, or Neo-Darwinist ideas, even when such ideas might have contributed to enduring biases and prejudices within both the scientific community and broader society.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sapolsky RM. Behave - the biology of humans at our best and worst. New York: Penguin Press; 2017.
Tallis F. The incurable romantic: and other tales of madness and desire. New York: Basic Books; 2018.
Van Schaik C, Michel K. The good book of human nature - an evolutionary reading of the bible. New York City: Basic Books; 2016.
Delisle RG. The Darwinian tradition in context - research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017a.
Delisle RG. From Charles Darwin to the evolutionary synthesis: weak and diffused connections only. In: Delisle RG, editor. In The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017b. p. 133–67.
Delisle RG. Charles Darwin’s incomplete revolution - the origin of species and the static worldview. New York: Springer; 2019.
Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976.
Coyne J. Why do some scientists always claim that evolutionary biology needs urgent and serious reform? Blogpost: https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2016/12/26/why-are-scientists-always-saying-that-evolutionary-biology-needs-urgent-and-serious-reform/. 2016.
Futuyma DJ. Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis. Interface Focus. 2017;7:20160145.
Gupta M, Prasad NG, Dey S, Joshi A, Vidya TNC. Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche? J Genet. 2017;96:491–504.
Stoltzfus A. Why we don’t want another “synthesis”. Biol Direct. 2017;12:23.
Wray GA, Hoekstra HE, Futuyma DJ, Lenski RE, Mackay TFC, Schluter D, et al. Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? No, all is well. Nature. 2014;514:161–4.
Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Turner S. The role of internal and external constructive processes in evolution. J Physiol. 2014;592:2413–22.
Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW, Sterelny K, Müller B, Moczek A, et al. The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2015;282:10.1098.
Laland KN, Matthews B, Feldman MW. An introduction to niche construction theory. Evol Ecol. 2016;30:191–202.
Pigliucci M. Darwinism after the modern synthesis. In: Delisle RG, editor. In The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 94–104.
Pigliucci M, Muller GB, eds. Evolution - the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge. 2010.
Gould SJ. The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap: Harvard; 2002.
Smith RJ. Freud and evolutionary anthropology's first just-so story. Evol Anthropol. 2016;25:50–3.
Landau M. Narratives on human evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1991.
Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: J. Murray; 1859.
Grimes DA, Forrest JD, Kirkman AL, Radford B. An epidemic of antiabortion violence in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1263–8.
Leroi AM. The lagoon: how Aristotle invented science. London: Bloomsbury; 2014.
Ruse M. Monad to man: the concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.
Ruse M. Darwin and design - does evolution have a purpose? Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2003.
Ruse M. From organisms to mechanisms - and halfway back? In: Henning BG, Scarfe AC, editors. Beyond Mechanism: Putting Life Back into Biology. Lexington: Lexington Books; 2013. p. 409–30.
Ruse M. On purpose. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2018.
Gould SJ. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 1981.
Diogo R. Comparative anatomy, anthropology and archaeology as case studies on the influence of human biases in natural sciences: the origin of 'humans', of 'behaviorally modern humans' and of 'fully civilized humans'. Open Anatomical J. 2010;2:86–97.
Diogo R. Evolution Driven By Organismal Behavior - a unifying view of life, function, form, trends and mismatches. New York: Springer; 2017a.
Diogo R. Etho-eco-morphological mismatches, an overlooked phenomenon in ecology, evolution and Evo-Devo that supports ONCE (Organic Nonoptimal Constrained Evolution) and the key evolutionary role of organismal behavior. Front Ecol Evol EvoDevo 2017b; 10.3389.
Diogo R. Links between the discovery of primates and anatomical comparisons with humans, the chain of being, our place in nature, and racism. J Morphol. 2018a;279:472–93.
Diogo R. Where is, in 2017, the Evo in Evo-Devo (Evolutionary Developmental Biology)? J Experimen Zool B. 2018b;330:15–22.
Diogo R. Sex at Dusk, Sex at Dawn, Selfish Genes: How old-dated evolutionary ideas are used to defend fallacious misogynistic views on sex evolution. J Soc Sci Human. 2019;5:350–67.
Hoffmeyer J. Why do we need a semiotic understanting of life. In: Henning BG, Scarfe AC, editors. Beyond Mechanism: Putting Life Back into Biology. Lexington: Lexington Books; 2013. p. 147–68.
Baldwin JM. Mental development in the child and race: methods and processes. New York: MacMillan; 1895.
Baldwin JM. A new factor in evolution. Am Nat. 1896a;30:441–51.
Baldwin JM. A new factor in evolution (continued). Am Nat. 1896b;30:536–53.
Baldwin JM. On criticisms of organic selection. Science. 1896c;4:724–7.
Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003.
Prum RO. The evolution of beauty: how Darwin's forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world - and us. New York: Anchor Books; 2017.
Wetherington RK. Readings in the History of Evolutionary Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Lindholm M. DNA dispose, but subjects decide -learning and the extended synthesis. Biosemiotics. 2015;8:4431–61.
Dugatkin L, Trut L. How to Tame a Fox {and Build a Dog}. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2017.
Henning BG, Scarfe AC, editors. Beyond Mechanism: Putting Life Back into Biology. Lexington: Lexington Books; 2013.
Depew DJ. Darwinism in the Twentieth Century: Productive Encounters with Saltation, Acquired Characteristics, and Development. In: Delisle RG, editor. The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 61–8.
Bowler PJ. Darwin Deleted. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013.
Todes DP. Darwin without Malthus. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
Jackson MH. Galapagos - a natural history. Calgary: University of Calgary Press; 2016.
Aubin HJ, Berlin I, Kornreich C. The evolutionary puzzle of suicide. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:6873–86.
Mancuso S, Viola A. Brilliant green: the surprising history and science of plant intelligence. Washington DC: Island Press; 2015.
Fox CW, Westneat DF. Adaptation. In: Westneat DF, Fox CW, editors. Evolutionary behavioral ecology. New York: Oxford University; 2010. p. 16–32.
Kull K. Adaptive evolution without natural selection. Biol J Linn Soc. 2014;112:287–94.
Huneman P, Walsh DM, editors. Challenging the modern synthesis - adaptation, development, and inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Evolution in four dimensions - genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW. Niche construction – the neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2003.
Sultan SE. Organisms & environment - ecological development, niche construction, and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Turner JS. Homeostasis and the physiological dimension of niche construction theory in ecology and evolution. Evol Ecol. 2016;30:203–19.
West-Eberhard MJ. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
West-Eberhard MJ. Ryuichi Matsuda: a tribute and a perspective on pan-environmentalism and genetic assimilation. In: Hall BK, Pearson RD, Müller GB, editors. Environment, development and evolution: toward a synthesis. Massachusetts: A Bradford Book; 2004. p. 109–16.
West-Eberhard MJ. Dancing with DNA and flirting with the ghost of Lamarck. Biol Philos. 2007;22:439–51.
Wang Y, Liu H, Sun Z. Lamarck rises from his grave: parental environment-induced epigenetic inheritance in model organisms and humans. Biol Rev. 2017;92:2084–111.
Speijer D. We Should Not Use the Term "Lamarckian" as It Is Often Used in Opposition to "Darwinian". Bioessays. 2019;41:e1900092.
Diogo R, Ziermann JM, Linde-Medina M. Is evolutionary biology becoming too politically correct? A reflection on the scala naturae, phylogenetically basal clades, anatomically plesiomorphic taxa, and "lower" animals. Biol Rev. 2015;90:502–21.
Diogo R, Bello-Hellegouarch G, Kohlsdorf T, Esteve-Altava B, Molnar J. Comparative myology and evolution of marsupials and other vertebrates, with notes on complexity, Bauplan, and "Scala Naturae". Anat Rec. 2016;299:1224–55.
Diogo R, Guinard G, Diaz R. Dinosaurs, chameleons, humans and Evo-Devo-Path: linking Étienne Geoffroy's teratology, Waddington's homeorhesis, Alberch's logic of 'monsters', and Goldschmidt hopeful 'monsters'. J Experimen Zool B. 2017;328:207–29.
Dittrich-Reed DR, Fitzpatrick BM. Transgressive hybrids as hopeful monsters. Evol Biol. 2013;40:310–5.
Weisbecker V, Nilsson M. Integration, heterochrony, and adaptation in pedal digits of syndactylous marsupials. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:1–14.
Eldredge N. Extinction and evolution: what fossils reveal about the history of life. Toronto: Firefly Books; 2014.
Eldredge N, Gould SJ. Punctuated equilibrium: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: (e.g. T. J. M. Schopf). Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper and Co.: San Francisco. pp. 82-115.
Turner DD. Paleobiology’s Uneasy Relationship with the Darwinian Tradition: Stasis as Data. In: Delisle RG, editor. The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 333–52.
Lovejoy AO. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1936.
Shanahan T. Selfish Genes and Lucky Breaks: Richard Dawkins’ and Stephen Jay Gould’s Divergent Darwinian Agendas. In: Delisle RG, editor. The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 31–6.
Gould SJ. Full House: the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. Cambridge: Belknap Press; 1996.
Duke D. My Awakening: A Path to Racial Understanding. Covington: Free Speech Press; 1998.
Ryan C, Jetha C. Sex at dawn: how we mate, why we stray, and what it means for modern relationships. New York: Harber Collins Publishers; 2010.
Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: J. Murray; 1871.
Corbey R. The metaphysics of apes: Negotiating the animal-human boundary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Andreassen R. Danish perceptions of race and anthropological science at the turn of the twentieth century. In: Bancel N, David T, Thomas D, editors. The invention of race—Scientific and popular representations. London: Taylor & Francis; 2014. p. 117–29.
Hrdy SB. Mother and others - the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Belknap Press; 2009.
Coontz S. Marriage, a history: how love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin Books; 2005.
Holland J. A Brief History of Mysogyny - The World's Oldest Prejudice. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd.; 2012.
Nelson LH, editor. Biology and Feminism - a Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
Ackerman D. Natural History of Love. New York: Random House; 1994.
Beckerman S, Valentine P, editors. Cultures of multiple fathers. Gainesville: University Press of Florida; 2002.
Browning F. The fate of gender: nature, nurture, and the human future. New York: Bloomsbury; 2017.
Feiler B. The First Love Story - Adam, Even and us. New York: Penguin Press; 2017.
Fine C. Testosterone Rex - Myths of Sex, Science and Society. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2017.
Finkel EJ. The All-or-Nothing Marriage - How the Best Marriages Work. New York: Penguin Press; 2017.
Greenblastt S. The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2017.
Pavlicev M, Wagner G. The evolutionary origin of female orgasm. J Experimen Zool B. 2016;326:326–37.
Puts DA, Dawood K, Welling LLM. Why women have orgasms: an evolutionary analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:1127–43.
Diamond J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 1999.
Diamond J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking Press; 2005.
Cerello K, Kholoussy H, editors. Domestic Tensions, National Identities - Global Perspectives on Marriage, Crisis, and Nation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Levine N. The Dynamics of polyandry: kinship, domesticity, and population on the Tibetan border. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1998.
Chisholm H. Guanches. In: Chisholm H, editor. Encyclopædia Britannica. 11th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1911. p. 650–1.
Adler LL, editor. International handbook on gender roles. Westport: Greenwood Press; 2013.
Wibowo E, Wassersug RJ. Multiple orgasms in men - what we know so far. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:136–48.
Mah K, Binik YM. The nature of human orgasm: a critical review of major trends. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:823–56.
Mah K, Binik YM. Do all orgasms feel alike? Evaluating a two-dimensional model of the orgasm experience across gender and sexual context. J Sex Res. 2002;39:104–13.
Acknowledgments
I want to thank all the numerous colleagues with whom I have discussed these fascinating broader subjects. Special thanks to Viven Shaw and Ueso Montero, who did a very detailed review of an earlier version of this paper, and provided very useful comments, some of them literally included in the present paper, with their previous authorization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Rui Diogo declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Evolutionary Developmental Biology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diogo, R. Quasi-religious Belief in Darwin and Darwinism: “Straw-Men” Scientist Believers Everywhere. Curr Mol Bio Rep 6, 16–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40610-020-00127-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40610-020-00127-y