Abstract
In India and globally, domestic work continues to be one of the professions that is rooted in the history of colonialism, slavery, and servitude due to lack of workplace regulation and one-on-one power negotiation between the employer and the worker. Thousands of households in urban India are dependent upon domestic workers for tasks such as cooking, cleaning, washing, ironing, and caregiving. This profession predominantly consists of women from low socioeconomic families, and scheduled caste and tribe. Additionally, due to urbanization and a decline in the agricultural industry, majority of the domestic workers have migrated from various parts of the country due to poverty. The migrant women domestic workers (MWDWs) are often faced with exploitative conditions at the workplace and their social environment. Previous studies and policy initiatives have focused on workplace exploitation. However, there are challenges that go beyond the confines of the employer’s house that adversely impact the well-being of the MWDW. Using a social work lens that emphasizes the impact of the sociocultural, and economic environment on an individual’s wellbeing, the current study aims to go beyond the direct employer–employee relationship. This study analyses data from 91 MWDWs from 6 states in India—(i) Bihar, (ii) Jharkhand, (iii) Karnataka, (iv) Madhya Pradesh, (v) Odisha, and (vi) Uttar Pradesh. The results of the study contribute towards (i) providing an insight on the everyday hardships of the MWDW (ii) emphasizing the need to diversify the discourse of domestic workers’ rights and well-being to include the role of the family, community, state, and national level infrastructure, and (iii) recommending alternative approaches for securing decent work and overall well-being that can supplement government legislation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
SC are the untouchable castes of India. They live outside the villages and they were required to do the “dirty” jobs such as clearing feces, clearing dead animals, and leather work. They were not allowed to own land or property, enter places of worship, homes, etc. They were not allowed to touch (upper-caste) food, money, or clothing because they were doing the dirty jobs.
ST are the tribal people of India who live in forests and are nomadic tribes as well. They are not a part of any organized religions—they would be considered outcastes. They have their own dressing styles, traditions, food, and culture.
Dalits, also known as the “untouchables,” are members of the lowest social group in the Hindu caste system. The word “Dalit,” meaning “oppressed” or “broken,” is the name members of this group gave themselves in the 1930s. A Dalit actually is born below the caste system, which includes four primary castes: Brahmins (priests), Kshatriya (warriors and princes), Vaishya (farmers and artisans), and Shudra (tenant farmers and servants).
References
Barua, P., Waldrop, A., & Haukanes, H. (2017). From benevolent maternalism to the market logic: exploring discursive boundary making in domestic work relations in India. Clinical Asian Studies, 49(4), 481–500.
Bedri, N., Ibrahim Abdelmoneim, S., Tambal, N., & Adam, S. (2015). Factors influencing access of women migrant domestic workers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services at Khartoum State: the case of Ethiopian migrant domestic workers. Ahfad Journal, 32(2), 25–35.
Bose, P. & Srivastava, P. (2017). Water supply for urban poor in India. Water AID. Retrieved: http://wateraidindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Water-Supply-for-Urban-Poor-in-India-WEB.pdf.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.
Bronstein, J. (2017). Information grounds as a vehicle for social inclusion of domestic migrant workers in Israel. Journal of Documentation, 73(5), 934–952. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2017-0023.
Burger, R., Von Fintel, M., & Van Der Watt, C. (2018). Household social mobility for paid domestic workers and other low-skilled women employed in South Africa. Feminist Economics, 24(3), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2017.1414951.
Chakravarti, U. (2018). Gendering caste: through a feminist lens. Sage Publishing.
Chari, A. (2009). Gendered citizenship & women’s movement. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(17), 47–57.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscriminatory doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8).
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Crépeau, F. (2014). Report of special repportuer on the human rights of migrants. United Nations General Assembly.
Duffy, M. (2007). Doing the dirty work: gender, race, and reproductive labor in the historical perspective. Gender & Society, 21(3), 313–336.
Elmagboul, N., Dauod, S., & Tawaldi, S. (2017). Exploitation and violence against Ethiopian female irregular migrant domestic workers in Khartoum State. Ahfad Journal, 34(2), 19–29.
England, K. (2017). Home, domestic work, and the state: the spatial politics of domestic workers’ activism. Critical Social Policy, 37(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317695688.
Fortunati, L. (1995). The arcane of reproduction: housework, prostitution, labor and capital. New York: Autonomedia.
Gao, X., Chan, C. W., Mak, S. L., Ng, Z., et al. (2014). Oral health of foreign domestic workers: Exploring the social determinants. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 16(5), 926–933 http://dx.doi.org.proxy.seattleu.edu/10.1007/s10903-013-9789-5.
Geertz, A., Iyer, L., Kasen, P., Mazzola, F., & Peterson, K. (2016). An opportunity to address menstrual health and gender equity. Boston: FSG Boston.
Government of India (2019). Census data 2010. Housing. Retrieved: http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_And_You/housing.aspx.
Gurung, S. H. (2009). Nepali female migrants and informalization of domestic care work: Service or servitude? Journal of Workplace Rights, 14(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.14.3.g.
Gutierrez-Rodriguez, E. (2010). Migration, domestic work, and affect: a decolonial approach on value and the feminization of labor. New York: Routledge.
Hartmann, H. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(3), 137–169. https://doi.org/10.1086/493283.
Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: from margin to center. South End Press.
International Labor Organization. (2011). C189: convention concerning decent work for domestic workers. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C189.
International Labor Organization. (2013). Domestic workers across the world: global and regional statistics and the extent of legal protection. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/%2D%2D-publ/documents/publication/wcms_173363.pdf.
International Labor Organization. (2015). Migrant domestic workers across the world: global and regional estimates. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-ed_protect/%2D%2D-protrav/%2D%2D-migrant/documents/briefingnote/wcms_490162.pdf.
Kennedy, E. (2010). The invisible corner: expanding workplace rights for female day laborers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 31(1), 126–159 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.seattleu.edu/stable/26377728.
Liao, M., & Hong, J. S. (2010). Child labor in the People's Republic of China: an ecological systems analysis. International Social Work, 54(4), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810382804.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: towards a feminist synthesis. Feminist Review, 57(1), 28–48.
Mahajan, N. (2013). The invisible caregivers: domestic workers in Mumbai and their struggle for unionizations. Women’s Policy Journal of Harvard.
Marshall, T. H. (1950). Ctizenship and social class and other essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of Labour and Employment (2011). Final report of the task force on domestic workers: realising decent work. Retrieved from https://labour.gov.in/annual-reports.
Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary, 12(3), 333–358.
National Commission for Women (2010). Domestic Workers Welfare and Social Security Act. Retrieved from http://ncw.nic.in/pdffiles/domestic_worker_welfare_and_social_security_act_2010.pdf.
National Sample Survey Office (2018). Annual report 2016–2017. Retrieved: http://mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/mospi_Annual_Report_2016-17.pdf.
Neetha, N. (2008). Regulating domestic work. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(37), 26–28 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40277945.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Aae2f751ab50620d6a16e939afcc53443.
Nimunshakavi, N. (2012). Organizing domestic workers and workplace rights: a case study from Hyderabad. Journal of Workplace Rights, 16(1), 31–46.
Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Psychological Review, 58(3), 303–328.
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: democracy, feminism, and political theory. Stanford University Press.
Paul, A. M., & Neo, P. (2018). Am I allowed to pregnant? Awareness of pregnancy protection laws among migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(7), 1195–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1367651.
Prajapati, B. J., Banker, K., Chauhan, J., & Nayak, S. (2017). Sociodemographic and housing condition urban slum and rural households, Gujarat India. National Journal of Community Medicine, 8(2), 90–93.
Qayum, S., & Ray, R. (2003). Grappling with modernity: India’s respectable classes and the culture of domestic servitude. Ethnography, 4(4), 520–555.
Sadl, Z. (2014). Perceptions of stigma: the case of paid domestic workers in Slovenia. Teorija In Praksa, 51(5), 904–927 Retrieved from https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-PABW5DLQ/0f9668e4-322d-43f1-ba64-792a8557a5b3/PDF.
Singh, V. (2017). Understanding psychological and social problems of domestic women worker and its impact on their well-being. Indian Journal of Health and Well-Being, 8(8), 786–788 Retrieved from http://iahrw.com/index.php/home/journal_detail/19#list.
Sommer, M., Chandraratna, S., Cavill, S., Mahon, T., & Phillips-Howard, P. (2016). Managing menstruationin the workplace: an overlooked issue in low-income and middle-income countries. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(86), 86.
The Domestic Workers (Regulation of Work and Social Security) Bill, No. 92 (2017). Retireved from http://164.100.47.4/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/Asintroduced/695LS%20AS.pdf.
Thurston, W. E., & Vissandjée, B. (2005). An ecological model for understanding culture as a determinant of women’s health. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 229–242.
UN Women (n.d.). Domestic workers count too: implementing protections for domestic workers. Retrieved from http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2013/3/unwomen_iutc_factsheets%20pdf.pdf?la=en&vs=5930.
United Nations (2015). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
Van der Ham, A., Ujano-Batangan, M., Ignacio, R., & Wolffers, I. (2014). Toward healthy migration: an exploratory study on the resilience of migrant from the Philippines. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(4), 545–568.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Additionally, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, A., Quint, M., Sinha, P. et al. Undervalued and Overrepresented: Voices of Migrant Domestic Workers in India. Glob Soc Welf 7, 285–296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-019-00149-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-019-00149-0