Advertisement

Global Social Welfare

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 199–207 | Cite as

Parenting Programs for Underserved Populations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Issues of Scientific Integrity and Social Justice

  • Ana A. BaumannEmail author
  • Anilena Mejia
  • Jamie M. Lachman
  • Ruben Parra-Cardona
  • Gabriela López-Zerón
  • Nancy G. Amador Buenabad
  • Eunice Vargas Contreras
  • Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez
Article

Abstract

Research suggests that parenting programs are effective for preventing behavioral and emotional difficulties in children, but a lot more attention needs to be paid to issues of context and culture during the development, testing, and implementation of these interventions. The views and needs of underserved and disenfranchised communities in the USA and the Global South are often not taken into account for the development and testing of interventions. The successful implementation of evidence-based interventions for vulnerable children and families in underserved and marginalized communities requires careful consideration of how existing paradigms of prevention, evaluation, and implementation science impact issues of social justice and equity. This paper will describe how a team of parenting program researchers has been collaborating with their partners globally in generating local knowledge by balancing the need for rigorous scientific methods with issues of power. Authors from the USA, Latin America, Africa, and Southeast Asia draw on their experiences regarding challenges and successes with issues regarding study design and measurement, the transferability and adaptation of interventions, and the dissemination and implementation of different parenting interventions while placing communities at the center of their efforts through participatory methods. We describe innovative approaches that span the continuum of intervention development, adaptation, optimization, evaluation, implementation, and scale-up of different parenting programs for vulnerable children and families across the world. We conclude by offering specific and pragmatic recommendations to increase access of culturally relevant and effective parenting programs in these communities.

Keywords

Global mental health Parenting Scale up Scale out Implementation 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by 3U01HL133994-02S1, 1U24HL136790-01, 1R01HG009351-01A1, 3 UL1 RR024992-09, K01-MH066297, K01 DA036747;South African National Lottery [43137], UNICEF Philippines, UNICEF Tanzania, and UBS Optimus Fund [7905] .

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Sklar, M., Mustanski, B., Benbow, N., & Brown, C. H. (2017). “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems. Implementation Science, 12(1), 111.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0640-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdulmalik, J., & Thornicroft, G. (2016). Community mental health: a brief, global perspective. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 22(2), 101–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npbr.2015.12.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade, L. H., Alonso, J., Mneimneh, Z., Wells, J. E., Al-Hamzawi, A., Borges, G., et al. (2014). Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychological Medicine, 44(6), 1303–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems, 1(01), 65–70.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1637943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann, A., Domenech Rodríguez, M., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2011). Community-based applied research with Latino immigrant families: informing practice and research according to ethical and social justice principles. Family Process, 50, 132–148.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann, A. A., Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Amador, N. G., Forgatch, M. S., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2014). Parent Management Training-Oregon Model (PMTOTM) in Mexico City: integrating cultural adaptation activities in an implementation model. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 32–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumann, A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. E., & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: a systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumann, A., Cabassa, L. J., & Wiltsey Stirman, S. (2017). Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 285–300). London, UK: Oxford Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.
  10. Bayetti, C., & Jain, S. (2017). Problematising global mental health. In B. M. Z. Cohen (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of critical mental health. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Walsh, L., Lucas, S., Downey, M. M., Jackson, K., Fernandez, T., & Mandell, D. S. (2015). Free, brief, and validated: standardized instruments for low-resource mental health settings. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(1), 5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belfer, M. L. (2008). Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(3), 226–236.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01855.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernal, G., Bonilla, J., & Bellido, C. (1995). Ecological validity and cultural sensitivity for outcome research: issues for the cultural adaptation and development of psychosocial treatments with Hispanics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(1), 67–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01447045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Betancourt, T. S., & Chambers, D. A. (2016). Optimizing an era of global mental health implementation science. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(2), 99–100.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya, O., Wu, D., Mossman, K., Hayden, L., Gill, P., Cheng, Y.-L., et al. (2017). Criteria to assess potential reverse innovations: opportunities for shared learning between high- and low-income countries. Globalization and Health, 13(4), 4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0225-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blachman-Demner, D. R., Wiley, T. R., & Chambers, D. A. (2017). Fostering integrated approaches to dissemination and implementation and community engaged research. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(3), 543–546.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0527-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, J. S., & Hagel, J. (2005). Innovation blowback: disruptive management practices from Asia. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 35–45 Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, C. H., Chamberlain, P., Saldaña, L., Padgett, C., Wang, W., & Cruden, G. (2014). Evaluation of two implementation strategies in 51 child county public service systems in two states: results of a cluster randomized head-to-head implementation trial. Implementation Science, 9(134), 134.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0134-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown, C. H., Curran, G., Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Wells, K. B., Jones, L., et al. (2017). An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2017). Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed.). London: Oxford Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cabassa, L. J., & Baumann, A. A. (2013). A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science, 8(90).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-90.
  22. Chambon, J. L., David, A., & Devevey, J. M. (1982). Les Innovations Sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, L. M. (2014). Optimizing family intervention programs: the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). In S. M. McHale, P. R. Amato, & A. Booth (Eds.), Emerging methods in family research (pp. 231–244). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins, L. M. (2018). Optimization of behavioral, biobehavioral, and biomedical interventions: the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dixon, L., Salinas, M., & Marques, L. (2016). Advances and challenges in conducting research with diverse and vulnerable populations in a healthcare setting: reducing stigma and increasing cultural sensitivity. In R. Parekh & E. W. Childs (Eds.), Stigma and prejudice: touchstones in understanding diversity and healthcare (pp. 303–324). Switzerland: Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Baumann, A., & Schwartz, A. (2011). Cultural adaptation of an empirically supported intervention: From theory to practice in a Latino/a community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 170–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9371-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duncan, K. M., MacGillivray, S., & Renfrew, M. J. (2017). Costs and savings of parenting interventions: results of a systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(6), 797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fernald, L. C. H., Prado, E., Kariger, P., & Raikes, A. (2017). A toolkit for measuring early childhood development in low- and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Retrieved from: www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  30. Fernando, S. (2011). A ‘global’ mental health program or markets for Big Pharma? OpenMind. Retrieved from: http://www.sumanfernando.com/Global%20Program%20&%20Big%20Pharma.pdf.
  31. Furlong, M., & McGilloway, S. (2012). The Incredible Years Parenting Program in Ireland: a qualitative analysis of the experience of disadvantaged parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(4), 616–630.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104511426406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gardner, F., Leijten, P., Mann, J., Landau, S., Harris, V., Beecham, J., Bonin, E. M., Hutchings, J., & Scott, S. (2017). Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective. Public Health Research, 5(10), 1–144.  https://doi.org/10.3310/phr05100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodman, M. S., & Sanders Thompson, V. L. (2017). The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(3), 486–491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodman, M. S., Thompson, V. L. S., Arroyo Johnson, C., Gennarelli, R., Drake, B. F., Bajwa, P., et al. (2017). Evaluating community engagement in research: quantitative measure development. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(1), 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, M., Weisberger, E., Silver, D., Dadwal, V., & Macinko, J. (2016). That’s not how the learning works—the paradox of reverse innovation: a qualitative study. Globalization and Health, 12(36), 36.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, M., Marti, J., Watt, H., Bhatti, Y., Macinko, J., & Darzi, A. W. (2017). Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: a randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians. Health Affairs, 36(11), 1997–2004.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henry, D., Tolan, P., Gorman-Smith, D., & Schoeny, M. (2017). Alternatives to randomized control trial designs for community-based prevention evaluation. Prevention Science, 18(6), 671–680.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0706-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holt, C. L., & Chambers, D. A. (2017). Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(3), 389–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunsley, J. (2015). Translating evidence-based assessment principles and components into clinical practice settings. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(1), 101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. (2005). Introduction to the special section on developing guidelines for the evidence-based assessment of adult disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 251–255.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 29–51.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87, 56–65 Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/.Google Scholar
  43. Jain, S., & Orr, D. M. R. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on global mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 53(6), 685–695.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461516679322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirmayer, L. J., & Pedersen, D. (2014). Toward a new architecture for global mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(6), 759–776.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461514557202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I., & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82(11), 858–866.Google Scholar
  46. Lancet Global Mental Health Group, Chisholm, D., Flisher, A. J., Lund, C., Patel, V., Saxena, S., et al. (2007). Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action. Lancet, 370(9594), 1241–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61242-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Landsverk, J., Brown, C. H., Smith, J. D., Chamberlain, P., Curran, G. M., Palinkas, L., et al. (2017). Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (pp. 201–228). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leijten, P., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Gardner, F., van Aar, J., Schulz, S., & Overbeek, G. (2018a, online first). Are relationship enhancement and behavior management “the golden couple” for disruptive child behavior? Two meta-analyses. Child Development.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13051.
  49. Leijten, P., Raaijmakers, M., Wijngaards, L., Matthys, W., Menting, A., Hemink-van Putten, M., & Orobio de Castro, B. (2018b). Understanding who benefits from parenting interventions for children’s conduct problems: an integrative data analysis. Prevention Science, 19(4), 579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0864-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (2016). User-centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 180–200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lyon, A. R., Lau, A. S., McCauley, E., Vander Stoep, A., & Chorpita, B. F. (2014). A case for modular design: implications for implementing evidence-based interventions with culturally diverse youth. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mash, E., & Hunsley, J. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders: issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34(3), 1537–4416.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mason, P. H., Kerridge, I., & Lipworth, W. (2017). The global in global health is not a given. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96, 767–769.  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mazzucca, S., Tabak, R. G., Pilar, M., Ramsey, A. T., Baumann, A. A., Kryzer, E., Lewis, E. M., Padek, M., Powell, B. J., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Variation in research designs used to test the effectiveness of dissemination and implementation strategies: a review. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(32).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00032.
  55. Mejia, A., Calam, R., & Sanders, M. R. (2015a). A pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief parenting intervention in low-resource settings in Panama. Prevention Science, 16, 707–717.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0551-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mejia, A., Calam, R., & Sanders, M. R. (2015b). Examining delivery preferences and cultural relevance of an evidence-based parenting program in a low-resource setting of Central America: approaching parents as consumers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1004–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9911-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mejia, A., Leijten, P., Lachman, J. M., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2017). Different strokes for different folks? Contrasting approaches to cultural adaptation of parenting interventions. Prevention Science, 18, 630–639.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mills, C., & White, R. G. (2017). Global mental health spreads like bush fire in the global south’: Efforts to scale up mental health services in low- and middle-income countries. In R. G. White, S. Jain, D. M. R. Orr, & U. M. Read (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of sociocultural perspectives on global mental health (pp. 187–209). London: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker, G., Ali, S., Ringell, K., & McKay, M. (2014). Bi-directional exchange: the cornerstone of globally focused social work. Global Social Welfare, 1(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-014-0011-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parra-Cardona, R., Leijten, P., Lachman, J. M., Mejía, A., Baumann, A. A., Buenabad, N. G. A., & Ward, C. L. (2018). Strengthening a culture of prevention in low-and middle-income countries: balancing scientific expectations and contextual realities. Prevention Science, 1–11.Google Scholar
  61. Patel, V. (2014). Why mental health matters to global health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(6), 777–789.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461514524473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Patel, V., Boyce, N., Collins, P. Y., Saxena, S., & Horton, R. (2011). A renewed agenda for global mental health. Lancet, 378(9801), 1441–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61385-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2010). Cascading effects following intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 22(04), 949–970.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(2), 65–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2017). Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In R. Brownson, G. Colditz, & E. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 19–45). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roberts, M. C., Blossom, J. B., Evans, S. C., Amaro, C. M., & Kanine, R. M. (2017). Advancing the scientific foundation for evidence-based practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 46(6), 915–928.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1152554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shelton, K. K., Frick, P. J., & Wootton, J. (1996). Assessment of parenting practices in families of elementary school-age children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 317–329.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2503_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2016). Defining “evidence based”. Retrieved from: https://www.samhsa.gov/capt/applying-strategic-prevention-framework/step3-plan/defining-evidence-based
  69. Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trimble, C., & Govindarajan, V. (2012). Reverse innovation: create far from home, win everywhere. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  71. van Aar, J., Leijten, P., de Castro, B. O., & Overbeek, G. (2017). Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weiss, B., Ngo, V. K., Dang, H. M., Pollack, A., Trung, L. T., Tran, C. V., et al. (2012). A model for sustainable development of child mental health infrastructure in the lmic world: Vietnam as a case example. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1, 63–77.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weisz, J. R., & Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  74. White, R. G., Gregg, J., Batten, S., Hayes, L. L., & Kasujja, R. (2017). Contextual behavioral science and global mental health: synergies and opportunities. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(3), 245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Whitley, R. (2015). Global mental health: Concepts, conflicts and controversies. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 24(4), 285–291.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015000451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. World Health Organization, & ExpandNet. (2011). Beginning with the end in mind: Planning pilot projects and other programmatic research for successful scaling up. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/strategic_approach/9789241502320/en/
  77. Yancey, A., Ortega, A., & Kumanyika, S. (2006). Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yancey, A. T., Glenn, B. A., Ford, C. L., & Bell-Lewis, L. (2017). Dissemination and implementation research among racial/ethnic minority and other vulnerable populations. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 449–470). London: Oxford Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683214.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana A. Baumann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anilena Mejia
    • 2
  • Jamie M. Lachman
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ruben Parra-Cardona
    • 5
  • Gabriela López-Zerón
    • 6
  • Nancy G. Amador Buenabad
    • 7
  • Eunice Vargas Contreras
    • 8
  • Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez
    • 9
  1. 1.Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT)Panama CityPanama
  3. 3.Centre for Evidence-Based Interventions, Department of Social Policy and InterventionUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences UnitUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  5. 5.Steve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  6. 6.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  7. 7.Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente MuñizMexico CityMexico
  8. 8.Universidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaEnsenadaMexico
  9. 9.Utah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations