Advertisement

Global Social Welfare

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 91–103 | Cite as

Participants’ Perceptions of the Nature of Events Aimed at Engaging Men to Eliminate Gender-Based Violence

  • Juliana Carlson
  • Christopher T. Allen
  • Cliff Leek
  • Heather Storer
  • Erin Casey
  • Richard M. Tolman
Article

Abstract

Objective

This paper aims to describe men’s perceptions of the nature and content of events implemented globally to involve men in ending gender-based violence and to explore the degree to which the features of men’s prevention events differ across geographic regions.

Method

Data from 319 adult, male-identified individuals from 53 countries who had recently attended a prevention event were collected via a trilingual (English, Spanish, and French) online survey. Survey items assessed the recruitment strategies, substantive content, and content delivery methods of the most recent prevention event attended by participants.

Results

Overall, more participants attended events with an ongoing versus one-time format. Participants most commonly learned of an event through a direct invitation by an organization. Events included an average of four content delivery methods, most commonly group discussions and educational presentations. Multi-session events featured both more interactive delivery methods and coverage of more substantive topics. Some significant differences by geographical region appeared; for example, men in North America spent less time at their events than men in other regions, and events in Africa were more likely to feature interactive programming and survivors’ stories than did events in other regions.

Conclusion

The preponderance of multi-session and interactive programming in this sample is encouraging and consistent with principles of effective prevention. There may be a regional nature of the events to engage men in primary prevention of gender-based violence. Regional similarities and differences suggest the need for ongoing cross-regional discussion and learning regarding emerging effective approaches to involve men in ending violence.

Keywords

Engaging men Gender-based violence Prevention Events Regional analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants who volunteered their time to participate in this study. We are also grateful to Juan Carlos Areán, Rus Funk, Jonathan Grove, and Oswaldo Montoya, who generously donated consultation regarding the content and translation of the survey used in this research, and to the Mobilizing Men for Violence Prevention Global Advisory Board.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of a university human subjects committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abramsky, T., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Nakuti, J., Kyegombe, N., Starmann, E., Cundill, B., Kaye, D., Musuya, T., Michau, L., & Watts, C. (2014). Findings from the SASA! study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Medicine, 12(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: a meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 374–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banyard, V. L. (2014). Improving college campus-based prevention of violence against women a strategic plan for research built on multipronged practices and policies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(4), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banyard, V. L., Eckstein, R. P., & Moynihan, M. M. (2010). Sexual violence prevention: the role of stages of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, G., Contreras, J. M., Heilman, B., Singh, A., Verma, R., & Nascimento, M. (2011). Evolving men: initial results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) and Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Promundo.Google Scholar
  7. Basile, K. C., & Black, M. C. (2011). Intimate partner violence against women. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 111–131). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, J., Casey, E., Edleson, J., Tolman, R., Neugut, T., & Kimball, E. (2015). Strategies to engage men and boys in violence prevention: a global organizational perspective. Violence Against Women, 21(11), 1406–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casey, E., & Smith, T. (2010). “How can I not?”: men’s pathways to involvement in anti-violence against women work. Violence Against Women, 16(8), 953–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey, E. A., Carlson, J., Fraguela-Rios, C., Kimball, E., Neugut, T. B., Tolman, R. M., & Edleson, J. L. (2013). Context, challenges, and tensions in global efforts to engage men in the prevention of violence against women an ecological analysis. Men and Masculinities, 16(2), 228–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, L., & Chehimi, S. (2010). The imperative for primary prevention. In prevention is primary: Strategies for community well-being (pp. 3–31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. DeGue, S. (2014). Preventing sexual violence on college campuses: lessons from research and practice. Centers for disease control. Retrieved from: http://responsesystemspanel.whs.mil/Public/docs/meetings/20140505/EvidenceBasedStrategies_Prevention_SV_Perpetration.pdf.
  13. Dworkin, S. L., Treves-Kagan, S., & Lippman, S. A. (2013). Gender-transformative interventions to reduce HIV risks and violence with heterosexually-active men: a review of the global evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 17(9), 2845–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flood, M. (2011). Involving men in efforts to end violence against women. Men and Masculinities, 14(3), 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta, G. R. (2000). Gender, sexuality, and HIV/AIDS: the what, the why, and the how. Canadian HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review, 5(4), 86–93.Google Scholar
  16. Heppner, M. J., Neville, H. A., Smith, K., Kivlighan, D. M., & Gershuny, B. S. (1999). Examining immediate and long-term effi cacy of rape prevention programming with racially diverse college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katz, J. (2014). Engaging men in prevention of violence against women. In H. Johnson, B. S. Fisher, & V. Jaquier (Eds.), Critical issues on violence against women: International perspectives and promising strategies (pp. 233–243). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kimball, E., Edleson, J. L., Tolman, R. M., Neugut, T. B., & Carlson, J. (2013). Global efforts to engage men in preventing violence against women: an international survey. Violence Against Women, 19(7), 924–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matjasko, J. L., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Massetti, G. M., Holland, K. M., Holt, M. K., & Cruz, J. D. (2012). A systematic meta-review of evaluations of youth violence prevention programs: common and divergent findings from 25 years of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(6), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MenCare. (2015). MenCare: a global fatherhood campaign. Retrieved from http://men-care.org.
  22. Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K. (2003). What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peacock, D., & Barker, G. (2014). Working with men and boys to prevent gender-based violence principles, lessons learned, and ways forward. Men and Masculinities, 17(5), 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peacock, D., Khumalo, B., & McNab, E. (2006). Men and gender activism in South Africa: observations, critique and recommendations for the future. Agenda, 20(69), 71–81.Google Scholar
  25. Pico-Alfonso, M. A., Garcia-Linares, M. I., Celda-Navarro, N., Herbert, J., & Martinez, M. (2004). Changes in cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone in women victims of physical and psychological violence intimate partner violence. Biological Psychiatry, 56, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Storer, H., Casey, E., & Herrenkohl, T. I. (2015). Efficacy of bystander programs to prevent dating abuse among youth & young adults: a systematic literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. doi: 10.1177/1524838015584361.
  27. Temmerman, M. (2014). Research priorities to address violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9978), e38–e40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tharp, A. T., Burton, T., Freire, K., Hall, D. M., Harrier, S., Latzman, N. E., et al. (2011). Dating matters: strategies to promote healthy teen relationships. Journal of Women’s Health, 20(12), 1761–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tolman, R. M., & Edleson, J. L. (2011). Intervening with men for violence prevention. In C. M. Renzetti, J. E. Edleson, & R. Kennedy Bergin (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (2nd ed., pp. 351–370). Oakland: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UN (United Nations) 2017. Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49) geographic regions. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/.
  31. UN Women. (2015). HeForShe. Retrieved from http://www.heforshe.org/.
  32. Wilkins, N., Tsao, B., Hertz, M., Davis, R., & Klevens, J. (2014). Connecting the dots: an overview of the links among multiple forms of violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Oakland: Prevention Institute Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/connecting_the_dots-a.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. World Health Organization. (2007). Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: evidence from programme interventions. Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gender/documents/Engaging_men_boys.pdf.
  34. World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241564625/en/.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WelfareUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.PsychologyUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA
  3. 3.SociologyUniversity of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA
  4. 4.School of Social WelfareTulane UniversityOrleansUSA
  5. 5.Social Work ProgramUniversity of Washington, TacomaTacomaUSA
  6. 6.School of Social WorkUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations