Advertisement

Lexicography

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 119–133 | Cite as

From traditional to electronic lexicography: the dictionaries of Old English

  • Darío Metola Rodríguez
Original Paper
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review the standard dictionaries of Old English from the perspective of the evolution from traditional lexicography to electronic lexicography and to find the similarities and differences, together with their pros and cons. The ultimate purpose is to find which of these four dictionaries is more suitable for linguistic research in Old English for scholars in the field. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Bosworth and Toller in Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1973), The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon (Sweet in Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976), A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Hall in University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1996) and The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A–G (Healey et al. in Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2008) are examined with respect to headwords, alternative spellings and cross-references, vowel quantity and textual evidence.

Keywords

Lexicography Electronic lexicography Old English Dictionary 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded through the project FFI2014-59110 (MINECO), which is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Bosworth, Joseph. 1848. A compendious Anglo-Saxon and English Dictionary. London: J. R. Smith.Google Scholar
  2. Bosworth, Joseph. and Thomas N. Toller. 1973 (1898). Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, Alistair. 1987 (1959). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, Michael. 1993. Old English lexicography and the problem of headword spelling. American Notes and Queries 6: 3–11.Google Scholar
  5. Fulk, Robert D. 2009. Morphology and Diachrony in A Grammar of Old English and the Dictionary of Old English. Florilegium 26: 15–35.Google Scholar
  6. García García, L. 2012. Morphological causatives in Old English: The quest for a vanishing formation. Transactions of the Philological Society 110 (1): 112–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. García García, L. 2013. Lexicalization and morphological simplification in Old English jan-causatives: Some open questions. Sprachwissenschaft 38 (2): 245–264.Google Scholar
  8. Granger, S., and Magali Paquot (eds.). 2012. Electronic Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, John R.C. 1996 (1896). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Revised Edition by Herbert T. Merritt. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hanks, P. 2012. Word Meaning and Word use: Corpus evidence and electronic lexicography. In Granger, S. and Magali Paquot eds. 57–82.Google Scholar
  11. Healey, Antonette diPaolo, Ashley C. Amos and Angus Cameron eds. 2008. The Dictionary of Old English in Electronic Form A-G. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  12. Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A Grammar of Old English, vol. I Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Hogg, Richard M., and R.D. Faulk. 2011. A Grammar of Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holthausen, Ferdinand. 1963. Altenglisches etymologysches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  15. Kilgarriff, A. and Iztok Kosem. 2012. Corpus Tools for Lexicographers. In Granger, S. and Magali Paquot eds. 31–55.Google Scholar
  16. Koopman, Willem F. 1992. The Study of Old English Syntax and the Toronto Dictionary of Old English. Neophilologus 76 (4): 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martín Arista, J. 2012a. Lexical database, derivational map and 3D representation. RESLA-Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (Extra 1): 119–144.Google Scholar
  18. Martín Arista, J. 2012b. The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32 (4): 411–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martín Arista, J. 2013. Recursivity, derivational depth and the search for Old English lexical primes. Studia Neophilologica 85 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martín Arista, J. 2014. Noun layers in Old English. Asymmetry and mismatches in lexical derivation. Nordic Journal English Studies 13 (3): 160–187.Google Scholar
  21. Martín Arista, J. and F. Cortés Rodríguez. 2014. From directionals to telics: meaning construction, word-formation and grammaticalization in Role and Reference Grammar. In M. A. Gómez González, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and F. Gonzálvez García (eds.), Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229–250.Google Scholar
  22. Martín Arista, J. 2017a. “The Semantic Poles of Old English. Towards the 3D Representation of Complex Polysemy”. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities.Google Scholar
  23. Martín Arista, J. 2017b. “El paradigma derivativo del inglés antiguo: alternancias, recursividad y desajustes en la formación basada en los verbos fuertes”. Onomázein 37: 144–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mateo Mendaza, R. 2013. The Old English exponent for the semantic prime TOUCH. Descriptive and methodological questions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33 (4): 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mateo Mendaza, R. 2014. The Old English adjectival affixes ful- and –ful: A text-based account on productivity. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 67 (1): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mateo Mendaza, R. 2015a. Matching productivity indexes and diachronic evolution. The Old English affixes ful-, -isc, -cund and -ful. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 60 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mateo Mendaza, R. 2015b. The search for Old English semantic primes: The case of HAPPEN. Nordic Journal of English Studies 15: 71–99.Google Scholar
  28. Mateo Mendaza, R. 2016. The Old English exponent for the semantic prime MOVE. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34 (4): 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Novo Urraca, C. 2015. Old English Deadjectival Paradigms. Productivity and Recursivity. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 68 (1): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Novo Urraca, C. 2016a. Old English suffixation. Content and transposition. English Studies 97 (6): 638–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novo Urraca, C. 2016b. Morphological relatedness and the typology of adjectival formation in Old English. Studia Neophilologica 88 (1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quirk, Randolph. and Charles L. Wrenn. 1994 (1955). An Old English Grammar. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sweet, H. 1976 (1896). The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sweet, H. (Ed. & Trans.). 1871. King Alfred’s West-Saxon Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care, Parts 1 and 2. EETS 45 and 50, o.s. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tarp, S. 2012. Theoretical Challenges in the transition. From Lexicographical p-works to e-tools. In Granger, S. and Magali Paquot eds. 107–118.Google Scholar
  36. Vea Escarza, R. 2012. Structural and functional aspects of morphological recursivity. NOWELE-North-Western European Language Evolution 64 (65): 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vea Escarza, R. 2013. Old English adjectival affixation. Structure and function. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 48 (2–3): 1–21.Google Scholar
  38. Vea Escarza, R. 2014. Split and unified functions in the formation of Old English nouns and adjectives. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 9: 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vea Escarza, R. 2016a. Recursivity and inheritance in the formation of Old English nouns and adjectives. Studia Neophilologica 88: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vea Escarza, R. 2016b. Old English affixation. A structural-functional analysis. Nordic Journal of English Studies 15 (1): 101–119.Google Scholar
  41. Wrenn, Charles L. 1933. Standard Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 32: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de La RiojaLa RiojaSpain

Personalised recommendations