Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction of a Novel Ethics Curriculum to the Third-Year Psychiatry Clerkship Experience

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine if a brief ethics curriculum embedded in a third-year required clerkship differentially impacted students’ self-rated confidence versus competence (determined by a written examination) regarding ethical principles related to psychiatry.

Methods

Using a naturalistic design, 270 medical students at the University of Washington were assigned to one of three groups during their third-year psychiatry clerkship: a control group with no additional ethics content, a group with access to a pre-recorded video ethics curriculum, or a group with live didactic sessions in addition to the video curriculum. All students took a pre- and post-test that assessed their confidence and competence in ethical theory and behavioral health ethics.

Results

Confidence and competence were not statistically different across the three groups prior to completing the curriculum (p > 0.1). Post-test scores on confidence in behavioral health ethics were not significantly different between the three groups (p > 0.05). Post-test scores on confidence in ethical theory were significantly higher in the video-only and video + discussion group as compared to the control group (3.74 ± 0.55 and 4.00 ± 0.44 vs. 3.19 ± 0.59 respectively; p < 0.0001). Both the video-only and video + discussion group showed greater improvement in competence in ethical theory and application than the control group (0.68 ± 0.30 and 0.76 ± 0.23 vs. 0.31 ± 0.33, respectively; p < 0.0001) and behavioral health ethics (0.79 ± 0.14 and 0.85 ± 0.14 vs. 0.59 ± 0.15, respectively; p < 0.002).

Conclusions

With the addition of this ethics curriculum, students showed both increased confidence and competence in their ability to analyze ethical situations as well as increased competence regarding behavioral health ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data and course materials are available upon request from the corresponding author, TK.

References

  1. Smith TM. Medical students: know the fundamentals of medical ethics. American Medical Association, 2020. Ama-assn.org/medical-students/medical-school-life/medical-students-know-fundamentals-medical-ethics. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  2. Liaison Committee on Medical Education accreditation standards. International Association of Medical Colleges. http://www.iaomc.org/lcme.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.

  3. Saltzburg L. Is the current state of Medical Ethics Education having an impact on medical students? Online J Health Ethics. 2014;10. https://doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1002.02.

  4. Culver CM, Clouser KD, Gert B, Brody H, Fletcher J, Jonsen A, et al. Basic curricular goals in medical ethics. NEJM. 1985;312(4):253–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckles RE, Meslin EM, Gaffney M, Helft PR. Medical Ethics Education: where are we? where should we be going? A Review. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1143–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de la Garza S, Phuoc V, Throneberry S, Blumenthal-Barby J, McCullough L, Coverdale J. Teaching medical ethics in graduate and undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of effectiveness. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41:520–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrese JA, Malek J, Watson K, Soleymani Lehmann L, Green MJ, McCullough LB, et al. The essential role of medical ethics education in achieving professionalism: the Romanell Report. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):744–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehmann LS, Kasoff WS, Koch P, Federman DD. A survey of medical ethics education at U.S. and Canadian Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2004;79(7):682–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ecology of Health and Medicine. https://blogs.uw.edu/somehm/. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCormick TR, Min D. Principles of bioethics. Principles of Bioethics | UW Department of Bioethics & Humanities. https://depts.washington.edu/bhdept/ethics-medicine/bioethics-topics/articles/principles-bioethics. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  12. Venkat A, Drori J. When to say when: responding to a suicide attempt in the acute care setting. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 2014. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/562734. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  13. A Clinical Drug Study at the University of Minnesota Department of Psychiatry: The Dan Markingson Case. 2015. https://www.leg.mn.gov/docs/2015/other/150485.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  14. Decisions for adult patients who lack capacity. American Medical Association. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/decisions-adult-patients-who-lack-capacity. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  15. Van Staden CW, Kruger C. Incapacity to give informed consent owing to mental disorder. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(1):41–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chow GV, Czarny MJ, Hughes MT, Carrese JA. Curves: a mnemonic for determining medical decision-making capacity and providing emergency treatment in the acute setting. Chest. 2010;137(2):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baruth JM, Lapid MI. Influence of psychiatric symptoms on decisional capacity in treatment refusal. AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(5):416–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frances Farmer. YouTube, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAWAel-NkYM. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  19. Tate C. Farmer, Frances (1913–1970), 2003. https://historylink.org/File/5058. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  20. Testa M, West SG. Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2010;7(10):30–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell M, Quinones-Betancourt C. The impact of social science evidence in predicting dangerousness and establishing a duty to warn. Duty to warn. https://courses2.cit.cornell.edu/sociallaw/student_projects/DutytoWarn.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  22. Piel JL, Opara R. Does Volk V DeMeerleer conflict with the AMA code of medical ethics on breaching patient confidentiality to protect third parties? AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wandler M. The history of the informed consent requirement in United States Federal Policy, 2001. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/8852197/Wandler.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  24. History.com Editors. Nuremberg Trials. History.com, 2010. https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/nuremberg-trials. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  25. Shriram S. The thalidomide tragedy and its lasting effects. SQ Online, 2019. https://sqonline.ucsd.edu/2019/07/the-thalidomide-tragedy-and-its-lasting-effects/. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  26. The Tuskegee Timeline. The U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  27. Reimann M. Willowbrook, the institution that shocked a nation into changing its laws. Medium, 2017. https://timeline.com/willowbrook-the-institution-that-shocked-a-nation-into-changing-its-laws-c847acb44e0d. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  28. WMA - The World Medical Association-WMA Declaration of helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The World Medical Association, 2018. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  29. Tuskegee Study – Research Implications. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/after.htm. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  30. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Read the Belmont Report. HHS.gov, 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  31. Belmont Report Educational Video. YouTube, 2007. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7sfIA1dIGQ. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  32. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Federal policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ('Common Rule'). HHS.gov, 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  33. Lo B, Field MJ. Conflicts of interest and medical practice. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22944/. Accessed 4 Jan 2023.

  34. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Tim Kelly & Paul Borghesani

  2. Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA, USA

    Kevin Kelly

Authors
  1. Tim Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Borghesani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Kelly.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelly, T., Kelly, K. & Borghesani, P. Introduction of a Novel Ethics Curriculum to the Third-Year Psychiatry Clerkship Experience. Acad Psychiatry 47, 646–652 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01810-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-023-01810-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation