Skip to main content
Log in

Training Needs Assessment Survey in Pediatric Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Despite growing recognition of how curriculum modules can benefit child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) training, there are few standardized teaching resources for pediatric consultation-liaison psychiatry (PCLP). A Special Interest Group (SIG) of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Physically Ill Child Committee (PICC) conducted a needs assessment to establish interest in, and availability of, a library of online, self-paced learning modules specific to PCLP.

Method

An email needs assessment survey was distributed to the PICC listserv in the fall of 2019 with four core areas of inquiry: (1) clinical service description, (2) teaching barriers, (3) interest in curriculum resources, and (4) interest in evaluation resources.

Results

Respondents were representative of typical academic PCLP programs. The response rate was 28% (n = 39). Programs endorsed barriers to teaching including high service obligations and limited protected teaching time. All respondents indicated that they would utilize high-quality, online learning modules. Psychiatric complications of medical illness, catatonia, and delirium were identified as priority topics in the care of pediatric patients with comorbid medical conditions.

Conclusions

There are currently no published educational studies regarding the training needs for PCLP programs, even among tertiary care academic facilities. This training needs assessment is the first step in establishing a national PCLP training curriculum. New paradigms to develop standardized curriculum resources for PCLP are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Welsh JW, Schwartz AC, DeJong SM. Addictions training in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowships. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(1):13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Derenne J, Martel A. A model CSMH curriculum for child and adolescent psychiatry training programs. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;39(5):512–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan S, Myers K, Busch B, Brooks D, Alicata D, Ramtekkar U, Vo LC, DeJong SM. A national pediatric telepsychiatry curriculum for graduate medical education and continuing medical education. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021;31:457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in child and adolescent psychiatry. 2020.

  5. DeMaso DR, Martini DR, Cahen LA. Practice parameter for the psychiatric assessment and management of physically ill children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(2):213–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibeziako P, Brahmbhatt K, Chapman A, De Souza C, Giles L, Gooden S, et al. Developing a clinical pathway for somatic symptom and related disorders in pediatric hospital settings. Hosp Pediatr. 2019;9(3):147–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brahmbhatt K, Kurtz BP, Afzal KI, Giles LL, Kowal ED, Johnson KP, Lanzillo E, Pao M, Plioplys S, Horowitz LM, PaCC Workgroup. Suicide risk screening in pediatric hospitals: clinical pathways to address a global health crisis. Psychosomatics. 2019;60(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silver GH, Kearney JA, Bora S, De Souza C, Giles L, Hrycko S, et al. A clinical pathway to standardize care of children with delirium in pediatric inpatient settings. Hosp Pediatr. 2019;9(11):909–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Worley LL, Levenson JL, Stern TA, Epstein SA, Rundell JR, Crone CC, Wise TN, Rummans TA, Muskin PR, Bourgeois JA, Saravay SM, Pao M, Alter C, Steinberg M, Wulsin L, Breitbart W, Fricchione GL, Boland R, Epstein LA, et al. Core competencies for fellowship training in psychosomatic medicine: a collaborative effort by the APA Council on Psychosomatic Medicine, the APBN Psychosomatic Committee, and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:557–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw RJ, Rackley S, Walker A, Fuchs DC, Meadows A, Dalope K, Pao M, Albdah A, al-Mateen C, Altaha B, Andreu Pascual M, Crawford J, Dell ML, Derish N, Geertsma J, Guber K, Jacobson J, Kelly P, Namerow L, et al. Core competencies for pediatric consultation-liaison psychiatry in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship training. Psychosomatics. 2019;60(5):444–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes MT. Step 2: targeted needs assessment. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Third edition: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015. p. 29–30.

  12. American College of Emergency Physicians. Definition of boarded patient. [Website] 2011/2018 [cited 2021 June 6 2021]; Available from: https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/definition-of-boarded-patient/.

  13. Boland RJ, Becker M, Levenson JL, Servis M, Crone CC, Edgar L, Thomas CR. The milestones for psychosomatic medicine subspecialty training. Psychosomatics. 2015;56(2):153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heinrich TW, Schwartz AC, Zimbrean PC, Lolak S, Wright MT, Brooks KB, Ernst CL, Gitlin DF. Recommendations for training psychiatry residents in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics. 2014;55(5):438–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith MG, Witte M, Rocha S, Basner M. Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this work was presented as a poster at the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) Annual Meeting, October 2020 (Virtual Meeting). We appreciate the support of all members of the Pediatric Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Curriculum Working Group and Quentin Bernhard from AACAP.

Funding

Funding was provided for the module development described in this work by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Abramson Grant to the AACAP Physically Ill Child Committee. This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the NIMH, Annual Report Number ZIAMH002922. The project described was also supported by the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through grant number UL1TR001998. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Lynn Meadows.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The following authors list no potential financial conflicts of interest or disclosures: Jena Lee, D. Catherine Fuchs, Brian P. Kurtz, Genalynne Mooneyham, Sigita Plioplys, and Maryland Pao. The following authors disclose affiliations or involvement in an organization or entity with a financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript: Amy Lynn Meadows reports research grant funding from the Children’s Miracle Network/Kentucky Children’s Hospital Research Fund and the University of Kentucky Scholar Clinician-Scientist Pipeline Program, travel support from the American Psychiatric Association, and leadership positions at the Kentucky Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Khyati Brahmbhatt reports honoraria for presentations at annual meetings of AACAP and American Academy of Pediatrics. Richard John Shaw reports book royalties from American Psychiatric Publishing Association. Nasuh Malas reports travel support from the University of Michigan Professional Development Fund and that he holds leadership positions at the Child Committee of the American Association of Emergency Psychiatry and as an editorial board member for the PRITE and Child PRITE. Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay reports leadership positions on the New York Council for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (secretary and president-elect) and on the Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee (board member).

Ethical Consideration

The Faculty Needs Assessment was reviewed and approved by the University of Kentucky Medical Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meadows, A.L., Brahmbhatt, K., Shaw, R.J. et al. Training Needs Assessment Survey in Pediatric Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 46, 60–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-022-01587-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-022-01587-3

Keywords

Navigation