Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The McMaster Advanced Communication Competencies Model for Psychiatry (MACC Model)

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Communication is a core competency for all physicians in training. In Canada, the importance of communication during residency is recognized through the CanMEDS framework. Although literature exists around teaching communication skills to residents, research in psychiatry residents is lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore how faculty members conceptualize the development of communication skills in psychiatry residents and develop a model reflecting this.

Methods

The authors used a constructivist grounded theory approach. Purposive sampling was used to select 14 faculty educators who regularly supervise psychiatry residents in a single university-based residency training program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore educators’ perceptions of how communication skills develop during residency. Constant comparative analysis occurred concurrently with data collection until thematic theoretical sufficiency was reached and relationships between themes determined.

Results

Five themes underlie the McMaster Advanced Communication Competencies model, describing the progressive development of communication abilities in residents. Three themes identify foundational sets of abilities including: refining common foundational relational abilities, developing foundational specific psychiatric communication abilities, and learning to reflect upon and manage internal reactions. These foundational pillars then allow residents to develop a personalized art of flexible psychiatric interviewing, and skillfully partner with patients in co-creating care plans.

Conclusions

This research describes a preliminary communication competency model for teaching and assessing psychiatry residents. It defines the core communication abilities required for residents to progress to independent practice. Future research could explore and test the model’s validity and transferability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S, Silverman J, Draper J. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2005.

  2. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zolnierek KB, DiMatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.

  5. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. 2003; http://www.acgme.org. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  6. Simpson JG, Furnace J, Crosby J, Cummings AD, Evans P, Friedman M, et al. The Scottish doctor – learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):136–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurtz S, Silverman J. The Calgary-Cambridge referenced observation guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ. 1996;30:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ward NG, Stein L. Reducing emotional distance: a new method to teach interviewing skills. J Med Educ. 1975;50:605–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin L, Saperson K, Maddigan B. Residency training: challenges and opportunities in preparing trainees for the 21st century. Can J Psychiatr. 2008;48(4):225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ditton-Phare P, Loughland C, Duvivier R, Kelly B. Communication skills in the training of psychiatrists: a systematic review of current approaches. Aus N Z J Psych. 2017;51(7):675–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Summers RF, Barber JP. Therapeutic alliance as a measurable psychotherapy skill. Acad Psychiatry. 2003;27(3):160–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatcher RL. Interpersonal competencies: responsiveness, technique, and training in psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2015;70:747–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheiber SC, Kramer TA, Adamowski SE. The implications of core competencies for psychiatric education and practice in the US. Can J Psychiatr. 2003;48(4):215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.

  15. Tavakol M, Sandars J. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE guide no 90: Part I. Med Teach. 2014;36:746–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watling C, Lingard L. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE guide no. 70. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):850–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miles M, Huberman A, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.

  18. Ramani S, Mann K. Introducing medical educators to qualitative study design: twelve tips from inception to completion. Med Teach. 2016;38:456–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neville A, Weston W, Martin D, Samson L, Feldman P, Wallace G, et al. Communicator. In: Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.

Download references

Funding

McMaster Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences Research Innovation Grant (total amount: $4500 CAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasha Snelgrove.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snelgrove, N., Zaccagnini, M., Sherbino, J. et al. The McMaster Advanced Communication Competencies Model for Psychiatry (MACC Model). Acad Psychiatry 46, 210–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-021-01516-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-021-01516-w

Keywords

Navigation