Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Social Media in Psychiatry Recruitment: a Survey of Program Directors

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study assesses the utilization of social media profiles by psychiatry residency program directors when recruiting potential psychiatry residents and evaluates the attitudes of residency program directors toward social media profiles.

Methods

In 2019, a 26-item survey was created via RedCap and sent to 239 program directors who participated in the 2019–2020 general psychiatry residency match. Program directors were asked about whether they reviewed the social media profile of applicants, when in the process, and whether decisions about ranking were made on the basis of the information found. Program directors were also asked about their general thoughts on social media.

Results

Eighty-one responses were received (34% of program directors). The majority of respondents noted that they did not formally review the social media profile of applicants (n = 79; 97.5%). Ten of those 79 (12.7%) noted that they informally reviewed applicants’ social media profiles. Nearly all respondents of the survey either agreed or strongly agreed that a psychiatrist’s duty of professionalism extends to behavior on social media.

Conclusion

This study shows that the majority of program directors surveyed are not formally using applicants’ social media profiles in psychiatry residency recruitment. Program directors are performing this practice informally, however, and are interested in formal guidance in this area. Given the increasing dialogue regarding social media use in medicine, future studies should assess for what constitutes unprofessional behavior as well as creation of more formal guidelines to help program directors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Pew Research Center. Demographics of social media users and adoption in the United States. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/. Accessed 4/10/2021

  2. Black EW, Thompson LA, Duff WP, Dawson K, Saliba H, Black NM. Revisiting social network utilization by physicians-in-training. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(2):289–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sterling M, Leung P, Wright D, Bishop TF. The use of social media in graduate medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2017;92(7):1043–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Go PH, Klaassen Z, Chamberlain RS. Attitudes and practices of surgery residency program directors toward the use of social networking profiles to select residency candidates: a nationwide survey analysis. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(3):292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Medical Association. Professionalism in the use of social media. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/professionalism-use-social-media. Accessed 3/20/2021.

  6. Eliesbik A. #MedBikini paper will be retracted. Science Integrity Digest. 2020; Available at: https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2020/07/26/medbikini-paper-will-be-retracted/. Accessed 9/5/2020.

  7. Schulman CI, Kuchkarian FM, Withum KF, Boecker FS, Graygo JM. Influence of social networking websites on medical school and residency selection process. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89(1049):126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutherland S, Jalali A. Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells DM. When faced with Facebook: what role should social media play in selecting residents? J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):14–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee Opinion No. 715. Social etiquette for program directors and faculty. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):e141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pillow MT, Hopson L, Bond M, Cabrera D, Patterson L, Pearson D, et al. Social media guidelines and best practices: recommendations from the Council of Residency Directors Social Media Task Force. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(1):26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Adam Brenner for his guidance while preparing this manuscript. This work was previously presented as a poster titled “The Role of Social Media in Psychiatry Recruitment: A Survey of Program Directors” at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training in Dallas, Texas, on March 7, 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lia Thomas.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Manuscripts that are authored by a member of the Editorial Board undergo the same editorial review process applied to all manuscripts, including double-blinded peer review.

Additional information

This work was previously presented as a poster titled “The Role of Social Media in Psychiatry Recruitment: A Survey of Program Directors” at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training in Dallas, TX, on March 7, 2020.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ashiofu, E., Thomas, L. The Role of Social Media in Psychiatry Recruitment: a Survey of Program Directors. Acad Psychiatry 45, 742–745 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-021-01500-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-021-01500-4

Keywords

Navigation