Skip to main content
Log in

Empowering Clinician-Educators with Chalk Talk Teaching Scripts

  • Feature: Educational Case Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Lang VJ, O'Connor AB, Blatt A, Gracey C. Collaborative development of teaching scripts: an efficient faculty development approach for a busy clinical teaching unit. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(8):644–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang FY, Kogan JR. “We’re not too busy”: teaching with time constraints on rounds. Acad Med. 2018;93(10):1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramani S, Orlander JD, Strunin L, Barber TW. Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 2003;78(4):384–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DaRosa DA, Skeff K, Friedland JA, Coburn M, Cox S, Pollart S, et al. Barriers to effective teaching. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramani S. Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Med Teach. 2003;25(2):112–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Skeff KM, et al. Faculty development. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(s2):56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlander JD. Twelve tips for use of a white board in clinical teaching: reviving the chalk talk. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Irby DM. How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching rounds. Acad Med. 1992;67(10):630–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcdante KW, Simpson D. How pediatric educators know what to teach: the use of teaching scripts. Pediatrics. 1999;104(1 Pt 2):148–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgs J, McAllister L. Educating clinical educators: using a model of the experience of being a clinical educator. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):e51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brazeau GA. Handouts in the classroom: is note taking a lost skill? Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kavanagh EP, Cahill J, Arbuckle MR, Lenet AE, Subramanyam K, Winchel RM, et al. Psychopharmacology prescribing workshops: a novel method for teaching psychiatry residents how to talk to patients about medications. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41(4):491–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnfred SM, Gefke M, Høegh EB, Hansen JR, Fog-Petersen C, Hemmingsen R. Mental status examination training for medical students: the development of an educational video library with authentic patients. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(3):432–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Das K, Malick S, Khan KS. Tips for teaching evidence-based medicine in a clinical setting: lessons from adult learning theory. Part one. J R Soc Med. 2008;101(10):493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Merriam SB. Adult learning theory for the twenty-first century. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2008;2008(119):93–8.

  16. Green ML, Aagaard EM, Caverzagie KJ, Chick DA, Holmboe E, Kane G, et al. Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(1):5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le TT, Prober CG. A proposal for a shared medical school curricular ecosystem. Acad Med. 2018;93(8):1125–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan M, Li STT, Meyers FJ, Pratt DD, Collins JB, Braddock C, et al. Teaching as a competency: competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 2011;86(10):1211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The material in this report was previously presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Academic Psychiatry in Milwaukee, WI, September 5, 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip B. Cawkwell.

Ethics declarations

The methodology and survey instruments were reviewed by the IRB Chair of the Partners Healthcare Human Research Committee, who concurred with authors’ determination that the project fell into the educational rather than research realm and thus did not require IRB review.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cawkwell, P.B., Jaffee, E.G., Frederick, D. et al. Empowering Clinician-Educators with Chalk Talk Teaching Scripts. Acad Psychiatry 43, 447–450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01042-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01042-w

Navigation