Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physician Wellness: the Ethics of Studying Ourselves

  • Feature: Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html.

  2. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections. Quality Improvement Activities FAQs [Internet]. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections; [cited 2018 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/quality-improvement-activities/index.html.

  3. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections. Exempt Research Determination FAQs [Internet]. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections; [cited 2018 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/exempt-research-determination/index.html#4109.

  4. United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research [Internet]. 1979 [cited 2018 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html.

  5. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Natalie C. Ramirez

  2. University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Martha L. Carvour

Authors
  1. Natalie C. Ramirez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martha L. Carvour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie C. Ramirez.

Ethics declarations

This article is not research, nor does it involve any human subjects.

Disclosures

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez, N.C., Carvour, M.L. Physician Wellness: the Ethics of Studying Ourselves. Acad Psychiatry 43, 405–406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01034-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01034-w

Search

Navigation