Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 217–221 | Cite as

Integrating Clinical Neurosciences in a Psychiatry Residency Training Program: A Brief Report with Pilot Data

  • Jacob Cookey
  • Michael Butterfield
  • Celia Robichaud
  • David Lovas
In Brief Report

Abstract

Objective

A novel neuroscience curriculum was developed attempting to address the growing consensus that increased attention be given to incorporating clinical neuroscience in psychiatric residencies.

Methods

Eight 2-h sessions delivered over 2 academic years were incorporated into the teaching curriculum at one institution in which residents participated in case-based clinical neuroscience learning. Each session utilized multimodal teaching methods facilitated by two senior psychiatry residents with support from a faculty mentor. A survey assessing resident comfort with clinical neurosciences was gathered over four timepoints during the 2-year period.

Results

There were 69 attendees in total across the four time points, with a 100% response rate to the surveys. There was a significant overall effect found, F(3,16) = 12.64, p < .01, on resident comfort level between the four timepoints. There was a significant increase in comfort level at the third timepoint compared to the first two timepoints; however, there was a notable drop in comfort level between the third and fourth timepoint such that there was no statistically significant difference between the first and last timepoint. Nevertheless, despite mixed positive and negative responses on qualitative analysis, all residents supported the continuation of the course.

Conclusion

Resident comfort level did not change appreciably with this curriculum; however, there was unanimous support for the continuation of the course in future years. Incorporating this type of curriculum is feasible in a medium-sized psychiatry residency program. Given that subjective comfort ratings are not indicative of actual competency, future work should include objective, competency-based outcomes.

Keywords

Neuroscience Curriculum development Psychiatry residents 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Psychiatry of Dalhousie University for supporting this educational opportunity, with special thanks to Drs. Margaret Rajda (Director of Education) and Mark Bosma (Program Director – Psychiatry Residency Program) for their involvement in this initiative and ongoing support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

In accordance with the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement Article 2.5, the Nova Scotia Health Authority Research Ethics Board provided an exemption letter with no need for Board review of this quality improvement/educational initiative.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding Sources

There were no funding sources supporting this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Roffman JL, Simon AB, Prasad KM, Truman CJ, Morrison J, Ernst CL. Neuroscience in psychiatry training: how much do residents need to know? Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:919–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benjamin S. Educating psychiatry residents in neuropsychiatry and neuroscience. International Review of Psychiatry. 2013;25:265–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benjamin S, Travis MJ, Cooper JJ, Dickey CC, Reardon CL. Neuropsychiatry and neuroscience education of psychiatry trainees: attitudes and barriers. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:135–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fung LK, Akil M, Widge A, Roberts LW, Etkin A. Attitudes toward neuroscience education among psychiatry residents and fellows. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:127–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennett JI, Handa K, Mahajan A, Deotale P. Psychiatry chief resident opinions toward basic and clinical neuroscience training and practice. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:141–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bullmore E, Fletcher P, JONES PB. Why psychiatry can’t afford to be neurophobic. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194:293–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coverdale J, Balon R, Beresin EV, Louie AK, Tait GR, Goldsmith M, et al. Teaching clinical neuroscience to psychiatry residents: model curricula. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:111–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benjamin S, Widge A, Shaw K. Neuropsychiatry and neuroscience milestones for general psychiatry trainees. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:275–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chung JY, Insel TR. Mind the gap: neuroscience literacy and the next generation of psychiatrists. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:121–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:748–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Etkin A, Cuthbert B. Beyond the DSM: development of a transdiagnostic psychiatric neuroscience course. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:145–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ross DA, Rohrbaugh R. Integrating neuroscience in the training of psychiatrists: a patient-centered didactic curriculum based on adult learning principles. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:154–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Posner J, Stewart J, Rieder R. Neurobiological formulations: integrating clinical and biological psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2007;31:479–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunstone DC. A neurosciences-in-psychiatry curriculum project for residents in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2010;34:31–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger J. Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;105:98–121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bouwmeester RAM, de Kleijn RAM, van Rijen HVM. Peer-instructed seminar attendance is associated with improved preparation, deeper learning and higher exam scores: a survey study. BMC Medical Education. 2016;16:200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Cookey
    • 1
  • Michael Butterfield
    • 2
  • Celia Robichaud
    • 1
  • David Lovas
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaSurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations