Abstract
Objectives
This pilot study evaluated the effects of a smartphone-triggered method of feedback delivery on students’ perceptions of the feedback process.
Methods
An interactive electronic feedback form was made available to students through a smartphone app. Students were asked to evaluate various aspects of the feedback process. Responses from a previous year served as control.
Results
In the first three quarters of academic year 2014–2015 (pre-implementation), only 65% of responders reported receiving oral feedback and 40% reported receiving written feedback. During the pilot phase (transition), these increased to 80% for both forms. Following full implementation in academic year 2015–2016 (post-implementation), 97% reported receiving oral feedback, and 92% reported receiving written feedback. A statistically significant difference was noted pre- to post-implementation for both oral and written feedback (p < 0.01). A significant increase from pre-implementation to transition was noted for written feedback (p < 0.01) and from transition to post-implementation for oral feedback (p < 0.01). Ninety-one and 94% of responders reported ease of access and timeliness of the feedback, 75% perceived the quality of the feedback to be good to excellent; 64% felt receiving feedback via the app improved their performance; 69% indicated the feedback method as better compared to other methods. Students acknowledged the facilitation of conversation with supervisors and the convenience of receiving feedback, as well as the promptness with which feedback was provided. The use of a drop-down menu was thought to limit the scope of conversation.
Conclusion
These data point to the effectiveness of this method to cue supervisors to provide feedback to students.
References
Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78(1):153–89.
Bienstock JL, et al. To the point: medical education reviews—providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):508–13.
Veloski J, et al. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance: BEME guide no. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):117–28.
Wolverton SE, Bosworth MF. A survey of resident perceptions of effective teaching behaviors. Fam Med. 1985;17(3):106–8.
Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(6):777–81.
Burgess A, Mellis C. Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:373–81.
Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:a1961.
Wood BP. Feedback: a key feature of medical training. Radiology. 2000;215(1):17–9.
Branch Jr WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77(12 Pt 1):1185–8.
Reddy ST, et al. Barriers and facilitators to effective feedback: a qualitative analysis of data from multispecialty resident focus groups. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):214–9.
Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999;74(11):1203–7.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Penn State Office for Scholarship in Learning and Education Research for their support in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Considerations
Analysis of anonymously collected course evaluation data presented in this manuscript is permitted under our institution’s medical education data registry (Institutional Review Board ID: 00000123).
Disclosure
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding Source
Funding for the mobile application was made available through Aditya Joshi’s early career professorship award. No external funding was received.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, A., Generalla, J., Thompson, B. et al. Facilitating the Feedback Process on a Clinical Clerkship Using a Smartphone Application. Acad Psychiatry 41, 651–655 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0711-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0711-7