Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 650–658 | Cite as

Global Mental Health: Five Areas for Value-Driven Training Innovation

  • Brandon A. Kohrt
  • Carla B. Marienfeld
  • Catherine Panter-Brick
  • Alexander C. Tsai
  • Milton L. Wainberg
Empirical Report

Abstract

Objective

In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training.

Methods

Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation.

Results

Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and “deep accountability” when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds.

Conclusions

Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.

Keywords

Curriculum development Cross-cultural psychiatry Global mental health Medical education Training innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participants of the 2015 Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture annual meeting workshop on training in global mental health (April 23–25, Providence, Rhode Island, USA). The authors thank Anvita Bhardwaj for her assistance with workshop transcription.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study met criteria for institutional review board exemption.

Funding

The authors acknowledge salary support for Dr. Kohrt through K01MH104310 and Dr. Tsai through K23M096620.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

40596_2016_504_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (53 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 52 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373:1993–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel V, Minas H, Cohen A, et al. Global mental health: principles and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai AC, Fricchione GL, Walensky RP, et al. Global health training in US graduate psychiatric education. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:426–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marienfeld C, Rohrbaugh R. Impact of a global mental health program on a residency training program. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:276–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Dyke C, Tong L, Mack K. Global mental health training for United States psychiatric residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:354–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sweetland AC, Oquendo MA, Sidat M, et al. Closing the mental health gap in low-income settings by building research capacity: perspectives from Mozambique. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:126–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collins PY, Musisi S, Frehywot S, et al. The core competencies for mental, neurological, and substance use disorder care in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:26682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abramowitz S, Marten M, Panter-Brick C. Medical humanitarianism: anthropologists speak out on policy and practice. Med Anthropol Q. 2015;29:1–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panter-Brick C, Eggerman M, Tomlinson M. How might global health master deadly sins and strive for greater virtues? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raviola G, Becker AE, Farmer P. A global scope for global health—including mental health. Lancet. 2011;378:1613–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci. 1963;9:458–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education/Open University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butt L. The suffering stranger: medical anthropology and international morality. Med Anthropol. 2002;21:1–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunderson GR, Cochrane JR. Religion and the health of the public: shifting the paradigm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohrt BA, Upadhaya N, Luitel NP, et al. Authorship in global mental health research: recommendations for collaborative approaches to writing and publishing. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:134–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, et al. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med. 2013;88:82–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai AC, Ordóñez AE, Reus VI, et al. Eleven-year outcomes from an integrated residency program to train research psychiatrists. Acad Med. 2013;88:983–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I. Medical anthropology and the world system. Westport: Praeger; 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Padilla A. Teaching cultural competence in psychiatry utilizing an observed structured clnical examination. Providence: Culture and Global Mental Health 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture; 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kohrt BA, Jordans MJD, Rai S, et al. Therapist competence in global mental health: development of the enhancing assessment of common therapeutic factors (ENACT) rating scale. Behav Res Ther. 2015;69:11–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis-Fernandez R, Aggarwal NK, Hinton L, et al. DSM5 handbook on the cultural formulation interview. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ACGME/ABPN The psychiatry milestone project. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, 2013.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, et al. Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:438–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon A. Kohrt
    • 1
  • Carla B. Marienfeld
    • 2
  • Catherine Panter-Brick
    • 3
  • Alexander C. Tsai
    • 4
  • Milton L. Wainberg
    • 5
  1. 1.Duke Global Health Institute, Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Yale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  5. 5.Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations