Abstract
Objective
The purpose of financial conflict of interest disclosures by speakers at continuing medical education (CME) programs is to assist attendees in their assessment of the objectivity of the information presented. This empirical study was undertaken to determine what level of disclosure is optimal to achieve this goal.
Methods
Attendees at five CME programs were randomly assigned to receive either a standard financial disclosure, an intermediate level that included whether speakers received more or less than 5 % of their income from each company they disclosed, or a high level of disclosure that included the percent of their income derived from each company. A total of 169 attendees (85.4 % response rate) completed a questionnaire regarding the objectivity of the CME presentation they attended.
Results
Attendees receiving the highest level of disclosure came significantly closer to the ratings of speaker bias made by peer reviewers than did attendees receiving medium or low levels of disclosure (p = 0.03; effect size 0.31). Among the minority of attendees who received the highest level of disclosure but whose assessment of bias differed from that of peer reviewers, however, there was a tendency to underestimate bias (5.9 vs 31.4 %; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
The major limitation of this study was an overall low level of bias in the presentations, making it difficult to generalize these findings to less objective programs. The study did not address whether the process of disclosure had an impact on speakers’ behavior. This study provides mixed support for higher levels of financial disclosure than are currently required for CME programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Medical Association. State medical licensure requirements and statistics 2014, AMA Press.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The maintenance of certification program. Available at http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/members/moc/regulations.
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Maintenance of certification in psychiatry. Available at http://www.abpn.com/maintain-certification/.
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Accountability to the public. Available at http://www.accme.org/about-us/accountability-to-the-public.
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Standards for commercial support. Available at http://www.accme.org/about-us/accountability-to-the-public/standards-commercial-support.
Dana J, Loewenstein G. A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. JAMA. 2003;290:252–5.
Moore DA, Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Bazerman MH eds: Conflict of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Moore DA. The dirt on coming clean: perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J Leg Stud. 2005;34:1–25.
Loewenstein G, Sunita S, Cain DM. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2012;307:669–70.
Silverman GK, Loewenstein GF, Anderson BL, Ubel PA, Zinberg S, Schulkin J. Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians. J Med Ethics. 2010;36:265–70.
Disclosures
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jibson, M.D., Cobourn, L.A. & Seibert, J.K. The Impact of Financial Disclosure on Attendee Assessment of Objectivity in Continuing Medical Education Programs in Psychiatry: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Acad Psychiatry 40, 282–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0366-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0366-1